arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.31959

A Model-Agnostic Correction Framework for Short-Term Building Load Forecasting

Abstract

Short-term building load forecasting remains challenging because load patterns can change rapidly with weather and operating conditions. Data-driven forecasting models may become less reliable when the current operating regime is rare or poorly represented during training, even when similar situations exist elsewhere in the historical record. Recent advances in retrieval-augmented time series forecasting offer a promising way to adapt predictions to changing conditions by directly reusing relevant historical cases at inference time. Motivated by this idea, we propose WeL-RAC, a model-agnostic Weather-Load Retrieval-Augmented Correction framework that explicitly retrieves such evidence at prediction time. WeL-RAC retrieves historical cases that are similar to the current condition based on both recent load states and horizon-aligned weather forecasts. Their observed future load trajectories are then aggregated and used to correct the initial prediction, without retraining or modifying the base forecaster. We evaluate WeL-RAC on 31 building cases across three datasets, eight forecasting backbones, and four horizons from 1 to 18 hours. The framework improves the corresponding base forecasters in 90 of 96 dataset-level comparisons. Beyond accuracy, success and failure case studies further illustrate the framework's interpretability by tracing how retrieved historical evidence improves or degrades forecasts. These findings support explicit historical retrieval as an effective and interpretable complement to the building load forecasting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shiqiao Zhou, Huanbo Lyu, Holger Schöner, Zipeng Wu, Jessica Deuschel, Freya Wentzel, IAG Wilson, Shuo Wang. 2026-10-22. A Model-Agnostic Correction Framework for Short-Term Building Load Forecasting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31959

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bridging Search Intent and Tabular Data in Dataset Search

Dataset search remains a bottleneck in data analysis workflows, as existing systems largely rely on keyword matching or shallow retrieval that fail to capture user intent. To facilitate intent-driven search, we present two retrieval components to equip multi-faceted dataset search interfaces through natural language. First, we propose Hypothetical Schema Embeddings (HySE) that uses a language model to generate task-aligned hypothetical table schemas which are used for embedding-based retrieval, bridging the gap between intent and table content. We introduce KaggleDS, a corpus comprising 6,503 tables and diverse task-queries derived from Kaggle, and show that HySE consistently improves recall over strong keyword and embedding-based baselines, as well as over a dense table retriever fine-tuned on KaggleDS. We also show that HySE generalizes to end-to-end question answering on, for example, the NQ-Tables dataset, a corpus of 169,898 Wikipedia tables with human-written queries, where HySE improves Recall@10 by +6.0 pp over dense retrieval baselines. Second, we introduce FlexPrune, which translates dataset constraints expressed in natural-language into SQL predicates over a customizable metadata index, enabling filtering across arbitrary metadata attributes. Combined with HySE, FlexPrune increases Recall@10 by +6.0 pp over dense retrieval followed by tag-based filtering. Our results show that natural-language-based retrieval supporting task and metadata queries offers a viable alternative to schema-level keyword search in dataset search.

cs.IR↗

Predicting What Answer Engines Cite: Open Decision Models, Rerankers and a Distilled 4B Student on Ten Engines under Controlled Retrieval

Generative engine optimization needs a scorer that ranks candidate pages by the share of an answer they will receive as citations. We measure pretrained rerankers, a hosted typed decision model (Jev), eight open decision models and distilled students on GEO-Bench queries answered by ten engines that receive the same candidate sources in their prompt. Where several engines answer the same query, they agree with one another at a within-group Spearman correlation of 0.704. Jev and two open 27B decision models, used without training, are the strongest scorers at 0.575 to 0.578. A Qwen3-Reranker-4B fine-tuned with low-rank adapters on teacher labels for other GEO-Bench queries, released as GEO Citation Ranker 4B, reaches 0.542 to 0.549 across three seeds, and its differences with the 27B models and with Jev are not distinguishable from zero on 229 queries. Most of the remaining distance between the student and Jev disappears when Jev scores one passage at a time, as the student does. Students trained on teacher labels and on observed engine citations reach the same level, and labels from Jev alone match the two-teacher target at 0.6B. We release the model, the benchmark, the predictions of every reported scorer and the code.

cs.IR↗

Role-Augmented Intent-Driven Generative Search Engine Optimization

Generative search engines (GSEs), which combine large language models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), are reshaping how users access Web information and making source visibility and influence in generated responses new optimization objectives. Existing generative search engine optimization (G-SEO) methods seek to improve content visibility, but many rely on direct access to target queries or GSE feedback elicited by those queries. However, Web content is typically optimized and published before future user queries are known, making G-SEO without access to target queries or their associated feedback an important yet underexplored problem. To address this, we propose RAID, a Role-Augmented Intent-Driven G-SEO method that operates without access to target queries or query-dependent GSE feedback. RAID infers a primary retrieval intent from source content, refines it through 4W multi-role deep reflection on prospective searchers' information needs, and uses both the primary and refined intents to jointly plan and rewrite source content. We further extend GEO-BENCH with diverse topic-related query variants, using both the original queries and their variants exclusively for evaluation to assess generalization to queries unseen during optimization. Across 100 samples and 500 evaluation queries, RAID achieves Relative Improvement Scores (RIS) of 3.00\% for Objective Overall and 1.32\% for Subjective Average, exceeding the best corresponding results among the nine predefined GEO rewriting strategies by 1.31 and 0.74 percentage points, respectively. With an optimization considered effective when $\mathrm{RIS}>0$, its effective optimization rates for Objective Overall and Subjective Average average 58.0\%, exceeding the highest corresponding average among the predefined strategies by 4.5 percentage points.

cs.IR↗