arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.31346

From Signals to Evidence: Interpretable Underwater Acoustic Target Sensing with Large Language Models - Part II: Passive Detection

Abstract

Underwater acoustic passive detection is essential to maritime surveillance and intelligent ocean sensing. Existing detection systems typically collapse multichannel array observations into a binary decision or a scalar confidence score, offering limited insight into the physical evidence that supports or contradicts a target declaration. This limitation is acute at low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), where isolated spectral peaks and transient beamforming responses are inherently ambiguous and physically verifiable targets are characterized by an ensemble of coupled reinforcing cues. Building on the unified from-signals-to-evidence framework introduced in the companion Part I, this paper instantiates the framework for passive target detection. A physics-aware multichannel acoustic encoder encodes the array observations into complementary acoustic evidence tokens through a direction-guided architecture that combines minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) processing with time-frequency and fine-frequency representations. These tokens are combined with environmental priors and fed into a pretrained large language model (LLM) that evaluates target-present and noise-only hypotheses and generates a structured detection report detailing target presence, bearing, spectral-line locations, received SNR, range, and per-field confidence scores. A physics-parameterized data engine extended to realistic oceanic channels provides traceable supervision at both discrete-label and structured-description levels. Experiments under white-noise and mixed ocean-background conditions demonstrate reliable detection, accurate bearing estimation, and physically interpretable structured reports, validating the feasibility of evidence-grounded underwater acoustic detection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhiyuan Li, Yuge Zhang, Jie Chen, Xiruo Su, Zhengqiao Zhao, Xiling Yao, Lingji Xu, Jingdong Chen, Yixin Yang. 2026-10-22. From Signals to Evidence: Interpretable Underwater Acoustic Target Sensing with Large Language Models - Part II: Passive Detection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31346

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Combining Masked Language Modeling and Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning for Prosody-Aware TTS

Text encoders in neural text-to-speech (TTS) see only linguistic content, so prosody must be inferred from paired data and synthesised intonation is often flat. Contrastive text-audio pretraining (CLAPSpeech) injects prosodic knowledge by contrasting acoustic realisations of the same phoneme, but it never trains the encoder to tell different phonemes apart, and its interaction with masked language modelling (MLM) is unexplored. We study a curriculum for a speaker-conditioned phoneme-and-subword encoder: MLM, contrastive alignment over batches of different phonemes, and CLAPSpeech-style same-phoneme refinement. On Russian conversational speech, with each variant conditioning an identical Grad-TTS model, MLM followed by mixed-phoneme alignment gives the lowest word error rate (17.6% versus 32.8% for same-phoneme training alone) and the best quality and intonation ratings. Adding same-phoneme refinement improves same-phoneme retrieval yet yields the worst synthesis: embedding-space retrieval does not predict usefulness for generation.

cs.SD↗

Beyond Naturalness: Probing Automated Text-To-Speech Evaluators on Linguistically Grounded Dimensions

Automated Text-to-Speech (TTS) evaluation methods (Mean Opinion Score (MOS) predictors and Audio Large Language Model (Audio-LLM) judges) are expected to reflect human perception, yet it is unclear how well they capture the distinct aspects of speech that listeners actually perceive. We deconstruct "naturalness" into a linguistically grounded annotation schema spanning 10 distinct perceptual dimensions, and use it to construct the first dimension-level meta-evaluation benchmark for TTS, comprising 860 utterances annotated by trained linguist raters. Results from benchmarking four MOS predictors and four Audio-LLM judges reveal that MOS predictors are more sensitive to acoustic signal-level properties at the prosodic and paralinguistic levels, while Audio-LLM judges show selective, prompt-dependent detection that favors word-level errors and does not generalize across all dimensions. Neither class reliably captures a breadth of linguistically structured, human-perceptible speech errors. Our dataset, annotation schema, and evaluation code are publicly released to support more targeted and interpretable TTS evaluation.

cs.SD↗

Qwen-Audio-Jev: A Unified Interface for Audio Decisions

Large audio language models (LALMs) have made substantial progress in audio understanding. However, autoregressive text generation introduces computational overhead and latency in high-throughput applications that require frequent selection, judgment, and scoring. To address this limitation, we introduce Qwen-Audio-Jev, which augments Qwen-Audio-3.1-ASR-Flash-Next with a dedicated Jev decision head. The model unifies selection, binary judgment, and scoring through three decision primitives: CHOICE, NOUL, and SCORE. Given an audio input, a natural-language question, and an explicit answer specification, Qwen-Audio-Jev directly outputs a task-conditioned probability distribution or a numerical score through typed decision readouts. Evaluation across 18 benchmarks demonstrates the model's effectiveness: CHOICE achieves 78.40 percent accuracy on MMAU and 83.14 percent on MMSU; NOUL achieves 93.76 percent accuracy on the VoxCeleb1-O speaker verification benchmark; and SCORE achieves a normalized mean absolute error of 0.1235 on NISQA overall quality assessment. These results highlight the potential of Qwen-Audio-Jev for efficient audio decision-making in applications such as large-scale audio screening, speaker verification, and automated quality assessment.

cs.SD↗