arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.30580

DagFlow AI: Agentic Synthetic Data Generation for Personalized Statistics Learning

David Arthur·Ranjini Grove·Zaher Kmail·Curtis Atkisson
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To provide personalized learning experiences in courses that teach data analysis skills, instructors often search for datasets that appeal to a student's interests, align with specific learning objectives, and are appropriate for the student's skill level. Datasets that match all three criteria can be difficult to find. DagFlow-AI is an agentic AI data generation tool that creates realistic, synthetic datasets tailored to these criteria. Rather than mimicking existing datasets or generating observations directly, DagFlow-AI uses the broad knowledge and reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to specify the components of transparent, reproducible data-generating mechanisms from which observations are generated programmatically. We illustrate how the tool can be used to construct a realistic, synthetic dataset and describe how it aligns with both the Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction of Statistics Education (GAISE) and the Problem, Plan, Data, Analysis, and Conclusion (PPDAC) framework for teaching data analysis

Explore related subjects

stat.OT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David Arthur, Ranjini Grove, Zaher Kmail, Curtis Atkisson. 2026-10-22. DagFlow AI: Agentic Synthetic Data Generation for Personalized Statistics Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30580

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Reorganizing Graduate Statistical Inference for Modern Biostatistical Practice

First-year graduate courses in statistical inference within PhD programs in biostatistics often follow a classical mathematical statistics progression through probability models, data reduction, point estimation, testing and interval estimation, and asymptotic evaluation. This organization has clear pedagogical strengths, but may provide less guidance when the probability model is not the natural starting point. We propose a complementary target-first organization for a graduate statistical inference course in biostatistics. The course begins with the scientific question and target parameter, then introduces statistical model classes, estimation, first-order sampling behavior, inference, and efficiency within a common framework. Classical methods such as maximum likelihood, method of moments, estimating equations, confidence intervals, hypothesis tests, bootstrap and jackknife methods, and the Cramér--Rao bound are organized within a common inferential workflow. A central advantage of this organization is that the same workflow provides a natural bridge from classical inference to modern statistical problems, including flexible estimation using machine learning and artificial intelligence, policy learning, anytime-valid inference, and modern Bayesian methods.

stat.OT↗
arXiv2026

More Treatments More Problems: Designing the 2026 American Causal Inference Conference Data Challenge

This paper documents the design of the 2026 American Causal Inference Conference (ACIC) Data Challenge, which uses a large set of simulations to evaluate the performance of a wide variety of causal inference estimators chosen and implemented by challenge participants. Unlike previous ACIC Data Challenges, which tended to mimic observational studies with a single binary treatment, the 2026 Data Challenge focused on randomized control trials with five arms (one control and four active treatments) to isolate key estimation challenges that arise when simultaneously estimating multiple treatment effects. We created 9,000 distinct synthetic populations corresponding to 18 distinct settings to explore variation in performance corresponding to patterns of treatment effect heterogeneity and response surface specifications. From each population, a sample of n = 1,000 was drawn for participants to estimate individual, subgroup, sample, and population-level treatment effects and identify the optimal treatment arm at each level. We describe several strategies used to generate the data to prevent Challenge participants from exploiting structural sim across datasets and ``gaming the system.'' By detailing these simulation design considerations and data generation choices, this paper provides a framework for conducting large-scale, unconfounded synthetic benchmark studies to rigorously evaluate multi-treatment causal inference procedures.

stat.OT↗
arXiv2026

Oh doughnuts, it's the variance! A visual metaphor for the variance, standard deviation, and related quantities

Despite the rise of artificial intelligence, human intuition endures as both a foundation for education and also (for now) a primarily human experience. We re-examine a formula for the sum of squares that is sometimes set aside because of possible numerical issues. The formula can be used to create square doughnuts, a delicious regional favorite. The variance becomes the dough, and we can examine the variance by either comparing doughnuts or by making different sizes of doughnuts with the same amount of dough. In doing so, we provide a new visualization of a cornerstone formula, understandable by students at almost any level. We further provide insight into related topics such as the coefficient of variation as well as a visualization of when numerical issues are likely to be problematic. We also provide a new vocabulary for understanding the variance formula, with `dough' and `hole' taking the place of less edible concepts from the typical recipe.

stat.OT↗