arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.30470

HeyGen Voice: Scene-Aware Voice Cloning for Talking Videos

Abstract

Most voice-cloning systems are built for audio alone: they copy the reference recording's delivery and acoustics, so a voice cloned on a phone sounds like a phone recording whether the speaker is pictured in a studio, on a street, or in a cathedral. Speech for a talking video should sound like the pictured person speaking in the pictured place. We present HeyGen Voice, a scene-aware voice-cloning model that separates who is speaking from how and where: it keeps the speaker's voice from an everyday recording while the target image sets the delivery and acoustics. Prior image-conditioned TTS does half of this job: it either adds scene acoustics without keeping a specific speaker or infers a voice from a face. HeyGen Voice is a multimodal autoregressive transformer conditioned on the image, speaker and scene captions, and the voice recording, trained in five stages that move from multilingual TTS pretraining through simulated and real cross-scene adaptation to reinforcement and preference optimization. Two clone policies trade scene adaptation against fidelity to the original recording, and an audio anchor holds long scripts in one voice and one acoustic environment. Listeners prefer HeyGen Voice over leading commercial systems across a third-party arena, production votes, and talking-video studies: it ranks first (Elo 1201) on the public Artificial Analysis controlled-voice TTS leaderboard (October 2026); in a blind test, users cloning their own voice chose it over ElevenLabs v4 and Cartesia Sonic 3.6 in 62% and 54% of votes; and volunteers rated talking videos of their own digital twin about 10 to 30 points higher (out of 100) when voiced by HeyGen Voice than by leading commercial alternatives. Try HeyGen Voice and hear samples at https://heygen.com/heygen-voice.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pavel Andreev, Andrei Gusev, Adithya Narayan, Yi Ren, Ivan Somov, Zijian Li, Sergey Demyanov, Viktor Goriachko, Alan Tan, Nik Nolte, Sam Prokopchuk, Andy Pan, David Chou, Kirill Leonov, Penghan Wang, Jiewei Yuan, Zhibin Hong, Rong Yan. 2026-10-21. HeyGen Voice: Scene-Aware Voice Cloning for Talking Videos. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30470

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Combining Masked Language Modeling and Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning for Prosody-Aware TTS

Text encoders in neural text-to-speech (TTS) see only linguistic content, so prosody must be inferred from paired data and synthesised intonation is often flat. Contrastive text-audio pretraining (CLAPSpeech) injects prosodic knowledge by contrasting acoustic realisations of the same phoneme, but it never trains the encoder to tell different phonemes apart, and its interaction with masked language modelling (MLM) is unexplored. We study a curriculum for a speaker-conditioned phoneme-and-subword encoder: MLM, contrastive alignment over batches of different phonemes, and CLAPSpeech-style same-phoneme refinement. On Russian conversational speech, with each variant conditioning an identical Grad-TTS model, MLM followed by mixed-phoneme alignment gives the lowest word error rate (17.6% versus 32.8% for same-phoneme training alone) and the best quality and intonation ratings. Adding same-phoneme refinement improves same-phoneme retrieval yet yields the worst synthesis: embedding-space retrieval does not predict usefulness for generation.

cs.SD↗

Beyond Naturalness: Probing Automated Text-To-Speech Evaluators on Linguistically Grounded Dimensions

Automated Text-to-Speech (TTS) evaluation methods (Mean Opinion Score (MOS) predictors and Audio Large Language Model (Audio-LLM) judges) are expected to reflect human perception, yet it is unclear how well they capture the distinct aspects of speech that listeners actually perceive. We deconstruct "naturalness" into a linguistically grounded annotation schema spanning 10 distinct perceptual dimensions, and use it to construct the first dimension-level meta-evaluation benchmark for TTS, comprising 860 utterances annotated by trained linguist raters. Results from benchmarking four MOS predictors and four Audio-LLM judges reveal that MOS predictors are more sensitive to acoustic signal-level properties at the prosodic and paralinguistic levels, while Audio-LLM judges show selective, prompt-dependent detection that favors word-level errors and does not generalize across all dimensions. Neither class reliably captures a breadth of linguistically structured, human-perceptible speech errors. Our dataset, annotation schema, and evaluation code are publicly released to support more targeted and interpretable TTS evaluation.

cs.SD↗

Qwen-Audio-Jev: A Unified Interface for Audio Decisions

Large audio language models (LALMs) have made substantial progress in audio understanding. However, autoregressive text generation introduces computational overhead and latency in high-throughput applications that require frequent selection, judgment, and scoring. To address this limitation, we introduce Qwen-Audio-Jev, which augments Qwen-Audio-3.1-ASR-Flash-Next with a dedicated Jev decision head. The model unifies selection, binary judgment, and scoring through three decision primitives: CHOICE, NOUL, and SCORE. Given an audio input, a natural-language question, and an explicit answer specification, Qwen-Audio-Jev directly outputs a task-conditioned probability distribution or a numerical score through typed decision readouts. Evaluation across 18 benchmarks demonstrates the model's effectiveness: CHOICE achieves 78.40 percent accuracy on MMAU and 83.14 percent on MMSU; NOUL achieves 93.76 percent accuracy on the VoxCeleb1-O speaker verification benchmark; and SCORE achieves a normalized mean absolute error of 0.1235 on NISQA overall quality assessment. These results highlight the potential of Qwen-Audio-Jev for efficient audio decision-making in applications such as large-scale audio screening, speaker verification, and automated quality assessment.

cs.SD↗