arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.30413

X-pressing Intimacy: Mental Health Disclosure After Twitter Acquisition

Olivia Pal·Yunhao Yuan·Meghana Mandava·Talayeh Aledavood·Eshwar Chandrasekharan·Koustuv Saha
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Social media platforms provide spaces for individuals to disclose mental health experiences and seek support, yet how these disclosures evolve during major shifts in platform governance remains unclear. We examine mental health self-disclosure surrounding Elon Musk's October 2022 acquisition of Twitter, analyzing approximately 824K tweets across anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder (BD), borderline personality disorder (BPD), and suicidal ideation (SI) or related experiences, alongside 266K comparison tweets. Using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and an LLM-based intimacy classifier, we characterize changes in psycholinguistic expression and disclosure intimacy. Following the acquisition, we observe declines in affective and social language, alongside increases in first-person singular pronouns and future-focused expressions. Intimacy patterns vary by condition: anxiety, depression, and BPD show increases in low-intimacy and decreases in moderate-intimacy disclosures, whereas suicide-related posts show more high-intimacy disclosures. However, compared with broader Twitter discourse, only the relative decline in moderate- versus low-intimacy disclosure for BPD remains statistically significant. Our findings underscore the importance of considering both language and intimacy when studying platform transitions, informing the design of online environments that support sensitive self-disclosure.

Explore related subjects

cs.SIcs.CLcs.CYcs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Olivia Pal, Yunhao Yuan, Meghana Mandava, Talayeh Aledavood, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Koustuv Saha. 2026-10-21. X-pressing Intimacy: Mental Health Disclosure After Twitter Acquisition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30413

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SAHG: Sector-Anisotropic Hyperbolic Graph Model for Social Bot Detection

LLM-driven social bots can generate fluent, human-like text, reducing the discriminative advantage of content-based detection alone. However, coordinated campaigns still leave relational patterns -- interactions, behavioral similarity, shared neighborhoods, community positions, and coordinated activity -- that graph-based methods can exploit. Existing graph detectors face two challenges when exploiting such evidence. First, Euclidean GNNs distort hierarchical and scale-free social graphs; while hyperbolic geometry addresses this volume-growth mismatch, fixed-curvature models still assign uniform geometric resolution to structural directions with different densities and separation needs. Second, relational evidence is not always reliable: sophisticated bots forge heterophilic connections with genuine users, causing neighborhood aggregation to mix bot and human signals and dilute account-level evidence. We propose SAHG (Sector-Anisotropic Hyperbolic Graph), addressing both challenges. SAHG learns a direction-dependent curvature field $γ(u)$ that adapts geometric resolution across structural directions, and uses sector prototypes to convert angular concentration and alignment into classifier-readable features. To prevent contaminated aggregation from overwhelming account-level evidence, SAHG encodes per-account features and graph-neighborhood representations in two independent SAH channels, fusing them only at the classifier. Experiments on Fox8-23, BotSim-24, and MGTAB show that SAHG achieves the highest accuracy and F1 on all three benchmarks, outperforming feature-based, graph-based, LLM-based, and isotropic hyperbolic baselines. Ablation and geometric analyses confirm the effectiveness of the anisotropic geometry and dual-channel design.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Exact computation of the network modularity with branch-and-bound

We consider the computation of the network modularity, a common measure of the structure of networks or graphs that quantifies the division of a network into modules or clusters. The computation of the network modularity is an NP-hard problem, thus making its exact computation often infeasible in practice. This has resulted in the development of several heuristics in the literature. In this work, we consider the exact computation of the network modularity with the help of a branch-and-bound algorithm. Our algorithm is guaranteed to find the optimal clustering that maximizes the network modularity, however it achieves this without a full exploration of the search space. This is accomplished by bounding partial solutions and discarding them if it can be foreseen that a partial solution will not yield an improvement over an existing solution. We assess our algorithm with respect to accuracy and runtime and compare it to a brute-force approach as well as two benchmark algorithms, simulated annealing and the Louvain method.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

In-Browser Human-AI Co-Writing for Counterspeech: An Exploratory User Study of Agency, Perceived Response Quality, and Time

Writing counterspeech that challenges online hate speech can be cognitively and emotionally demanding, whereas fully automated generation may weaken users' sense of voice and responsibility. We present an in-browser AI-assisted co-writing tool that enables users to contribute their own ideas and offers three editable suggestions generated by a large language model using dynamically retrieved hate speech-counterspeech examples from the Multitarget CONAN dataset. We evaluated the tool in an exploratory within-subject study with ten participants, complemented by think-aloud observations and semi-structured interviews with half of the participants. Participants wrote responses to three self-selected hate speech instances without assistance and then repeated the task with the tool. Final responses were subsequently peer-rated for empathy, non-toxicity, relevance, specificity, and persuasiveness. Participants evaluated the interface positively, and qualitative accounts linked user input, selection among alternatives, and small edits to perceived agency and responsibility. Assisted responses received higher descriptive mean ratings across all five proxies, with the largest difference for empathy. Mean composition time increased from 2.52 to 3.88 minutes. Qualitative findings further revealed a tension between empathy-oriented outputs and users' desire to express legitimate anger or direct disagreement. We contribute exploratory design guidance for treating AI-assisted counterspeech as deliberative co-writing rather than automated text production.

cs.SI↗