The Universal Law of Academic Capital: A Parameter-Unified Theory of Academic Integritology

Abstract

Academic capital, comprising research funding ($\mathcal{F}$), accumulated titles and honours ($\mathcal{L}$), and administrative power ($\mathcal{A}$), has undergone a silent global decoupling from verifiable epistemic output since the 1990s. Here we present a parameter-unified theory of Academic Integritology that integrates 64 major parameters into a coherent chassis of twelve fundamental equations (Eqs. 0-11b). The theory introduces two computable metrics: $Ψ$ (net epistemic indispensability) and $P_{\mathrm{safe}}$ (the Markov-blanket safety boundary of systemic integrity). The $D_{zj}$ fraudulence index, defined as $κ[\mathrm{Cap}]/E[P]$, quantifies this decoupling. Calibrated against retraction data from 40 jurisdictions and the careers of 12 Nobel-caliber scientists, the theory derives a universal law: when $E[P]/(w_1[\mathrm{Cap}])$ falls below $θ_c \approx 0.25$, honest research ceases to be an evolutionarily stable strategy. Three jointly necessary levers, raising $E[P]/(w_1[\mathrm{Cap}])$, auditing $R_{\mathrm{pol}}$, and constraining $ω$, restore $P_{\mathrm{safe}}$. Three levers, pulled simultaneously, suffice. The theory transforms academic integrity from a moral aspiration into an engineerable system property.