arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.30035

Plausible but Unimplantable: A Trustworthiness Audit of Shape Completion Foundation Models for Cranial Defect Reconstruction

Marek Wodzinski·Kamil Kwarciak·Daria Hemmerling·Mateusz Daniol
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A patient who has lost part of the skull vault needs an implant that fits the defect exactly, and such implants are still drawn by hand in CAD by specialists, which makes each case slow and expensive. The task can be considered as a shape completion problem, so pretrained completion models, and now the first shape completion foundation models, look like a way to remove that manual step. We audited three publicly released pretrained shape completion models, two of them foundation models, applied zero-shot to 239 cranial defects, some carved from public skull datasets and some real post-craniectomy cases. Each output was compared with simply returning the patient's own remaining bone, and tested for whether the predicted material could be placed without intersecting the bone that is still there. On the 210 carved defects none of the three improved on doing nothing, and on the 29 real cases only one did so beyond chance. Yet not one output, from any model in any configuration, was implantable: none managed both to stay clear of the bone the patient still has and to place more material than doing nothing, where a task-specific volumetric model, trained for this task and selected on these cases, was implantable on all but one. The output that most convincingly resembles a skull is no more placeable than the rest, and at these point densities implant thickness cannot be read off the emitted points at all, which is a property of the output representation rather than of any one model. On this evidence the shape completion foundation models we could obtain cannot be trusted and, used as released, are not usable in clinical practice. Substantial research towards trustworthy foundation models for shape completion is still needed.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marek Wodzinski, Kamil Kwarciak, Daria Hemmerling, Mateusz Daniol. 2026-10-21. Plausible but Unimplantable: A Trustworthiness Audit of Shape Completion Foundation Models for Cranial Defect Reconstruction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30035

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bilateral Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Flatter Minima

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) enhances generalization by reducing a Max-Sharpness (MaxS). Despite the practical success, we empirically found that the MAxS behind SAM's generalization enhancements face the "Flatness Indicator Problem" (FIP), where SAM only considers the flatness in the direction of gradient ascent, resulting in a next minimization region that is not sufficiently flat. A better Flatness Indicator (FI) would bring a better generalization of neural networks. Because SAM is a greedy search method in nature. In this paper, we propose to utilize the difference between the training loss and the minimum loss over the neighborhood surrounding the current weight, which we denote as Min-Sharpness (MinS). By merging MaxS and MinS, we created a better FI that indicates a flatter direction during the optimization. Specially, we combine this FI with SAM into the proposed Bilateral SAM (BSAM) which finds a more flatter minimum than that of SAM. The theoretical analysis proves that BSAM converges to local minima. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BSAM offers superior generalization performance and robustness compared to vanilla SAM across various tasks, i.e., classification, transfer learning, human pose estimation, and network quantization.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Understanding Transformer-Based Vision Models via Modular Feature Inversion

Understanding the internal mechanisms of deep neural networks remains a central challenge in machine learning. In computer vision, one promising yet only preliminarily explored approach is feature inversion via inverse networks, which reconstructs images from intermediate representations using trained inverse networks. In this study, we revisit feature inversion via inverse networks, introducing a novel, modular variant that enables a computationally more efficient application of the technique while, in some cases, producing semantically more coherent image reconstructions. We apply our method to large-scale transformer-based vision models, specifically Detection Transformer, Vision Transformer, Swin Transformer, and Data-Efficient Image Transformer, analyzing the resulting reconstructions across network depth. Our main analysis compares Detection Transformer and Vision Transformer, which exhibit the most informative differences among the evaluated architectures. At the same time, results for Swin Transformer and Data-Efficient Image Transformer support the broader applicability of our framework. Our findings reveal gradual representational changes across transformer layers as a shared characteristic of Detection Transformer and Vision Transformer, as well as systematic differences in how they preserve contextual shape and fine-grained image details, and in their robustness to color perturbations. These findings deepen understanding of transformer-based vision models and demonstrate the utility of modular feature inversion as an interpretability tool.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs

Humans develop perception through a bottom-up hierarchy: from basic primitives and Gestalt principles to high-level semantics. Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are trained directly on complex downstream tasks. Does it guarantee their performance on these foundational visual capabilities? To systematically investigate this gap, we introduce VisFacor, a benchmark that digitizes 20 vision-centric subtests from FRCT, a well-established cognitive psychology assessment spanning four domains of human visual cognition. Furthermore, we design algorithms to automatically construct and validate unlimited test cases with controllable difficulty. Using VisFacor, we evaluate 39 frontier MLLMs, including both proprietary (e.g., GPT, Gemini) and open-source (e.g., LLaMA, Qwen) models. The best model achieves a score of only 55.9%. Analysis reveals good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and construct validity (compared to existing vision benchmarks). Models consistently fail on tasks such as mental rotation, spatial relation inference, and figure-ground discrimination, regardless of model size or prompting strategy. These findings suggest that performance improvements on existing general benchmarks might represent castles in the air instead of a genuine mastery of human-like visual cognition.

cs.CV↗