arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.29344

Climate-Driven Supply-Demand Matching Reshapes Global SolarEV Decarbonization Potential

Yuchen Liu·Stefan Pfenninger-Lee·Tosiyuki Nakaegawa·Takuro Kobashi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Rooftop photovoltaics (PV) can support rapid urban decarbonization, but their contribution is constrained by the imbalance between PV generation and demand, both shaped by local climate. Growing urban electric-vehicle (EV) deployment creates distributed storage near rooftop PV, shifting PV electricity across time. Here we simulate rooftop PV integrated with EVs as batteries across 5,000 grid cells globally, using hourly meteorology and climate-induced demand. We find that PV-EV systems can supply up to 84% of annual building and mobility electricity demand. Self-sufficiency is highest where daytime demand aligns with generation and seasonal variability remains limited. Using PV capacity factor alone to screen PV-EV potential undervalues 21.9% of the world's 1,000 most populous cities because generation-side metrics overlook the temporal coupling of PV generation, electricity demand and EV storage. Substantial PV-EV potential is concentrated in many low-latitude cities, offering a pathway to cleaner urban energy systems while accelerating progress towards carbon neutrality.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuchen Liu, Stefan Pfenninger-Lee, Tosiyuki Nakaegawa, Takuro Kobashi. 2026-10-21. Climate-Driven Supply-Demand Matching Reshapes Global SolarEV Decarbonization Potential. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29344

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Matching-LLM: Historically Anchored Synthetic Prediction of Public Opinion and Elections

Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for predicting public opinion and electoral behavior, but their synthetic responses may not fully reflect human attitudes and heterogeneity. This study introduces Matching-LLM, a weighted framework that combines LLM-generated responses with historical human behavioral data. Using the World Values Survey, American National Election Studies, and German election survey data, we evaluate its performance in reconstructing survey responses and predicting election outcomes. Results show that Matching-LLM generally improves accuracy relative to LLM-only, including 11 of 12 comparisons on survey questions excluded from calibration, although it does not consistently outperform History-only. In the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Matching-LLM predicts 310 Republican electoral votes, compared with the actual 312, outperforming both single-source benchmarks in electoral-vote accuracy. A supplementary German application extends the framework to a multiparty setting. Overall, the findings highlight the potential of historical data to improve LLM-based predictions while emphasizing the importance of task-specific validation.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Tracks to Modernity: Railroads, Growth, and Civic Institutions in Denmark

We examine how railroads shaped Denmark's nineteenth-century economic transformation and the diffusion of Grundtvigian institutions. Using a panel of 1589 parishes and a difference-in-differences design for staggered adoption, we find that railroad connection increased local population by 7 percent, partly through internal in-migration, and structural change away from agriculture. Railroad access also brought cultural and institutional change by increasing the local densities of folk high schools and community houses, though these results are less robust than the economic findings.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

TRACE: Governing AI-Assisted Research with Principles from Computer Science

Artificial intelligence (AI) has made it easier than ever to produce research outputs. Adding an agentic tool to a research team's work potentially extends the team's capabilities but calls for an active approach to organizing the research process. The pressing question, therefore, is how research teams should organize their work with this technology. We contend that the question is not new: software engineering and security research have long studied how teams of people working with machines keep control of projects with many contributors. We distill principles from the practices these literatures report and transpose them to AI-assisted research. The principles form TRACE: Track records, Review against sources, Accept independently, Control transitions, and Evaluate corrections. Together, the five principles give researchers a common basis for remaining in control while integrating AI into their workflows. By bounding units of work and attending to how each is shaped, they can help researchers pace AI-assisted work to human attention rather than to the speed at which AI produces content. We also introduce TRACE-OS, an operating system for AI-assisted research projects. It puts the principles into practice through shared instructions, tools, and records that fit researchers' existing workflows. With TRACE, we aim to join a conversation about the governing principles through which the research community can benefit from AI. We contend that a simple enough and useful standard can contribute to harnessing AI capabilities, allowing teams to delegate parts of their work to AI, while also building trust within teams and the broader research community.

econ.GN↗