What I Disbelieve: Quantifying Belief With Negative Ranking Functions

Hanbin Go; Britt Anderson

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.28357

What I Disbelieve: Quantifying Belief With Negative Ranking Functions

Hanbin Go·Britt Anderson

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A challenge in exploring the psychology of human uncertainty is its measurement and quantification. Prior work has focused almost exclusively on probability, while the formal theories developed in philosophy are rarely tested. We tested Wolfgang Spohn's ranking theory, a normative account in which belief is graded by ordinal ranks of disbelief that combine by minimization rather than addition, as a descriptive model of human belief. Across six experiments, participants assigned ranks of disbelief to propositions involving personal experience, chance devices, sequential learning, and an Ellsberg urn. Ranks were reliable and, through the theory's two-sided rank function, distinguished belief, disbelief, and suspension of judgment. Participants respected the Law of Negation, never disbelieving both a proposition and its complement, in every task except a lottery. Disjunctions did not follow the theory's Law of Disjunction. Instead of taking the minimum rank of the disjuncts, participants averaged them. In a learning task, ranks aligned more closely than did subjective probabilities with objective probabilities. In an Ellsberg Urn scenario, the paradoxical behavior seen with betting was markedly reduced by ranks. We conclude that human belief has the bipolar, negation-respecting structure that ranking theory proposes, but combines disjuncts by averaging rather than by minimization. As a clear account of human belief dynamics with metrics that can be reliably measured, Ranking Theory provides a valuable framework for investigating and contrasting probabilistic and non-probabilistic accounts of human belief.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.NC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Hanbin Go, Britt Anderson. 2026-10-20. What I Disbelieve: Quantifying Belief With Negative Ranking Functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28357

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On sources to variabilities of simple cells in the primary visual cortex: A principled theory for the interaction between geometric image transformations and receptive field responses

This paper gives an overview of a theory for modelling the interaction between geometric image transformations and receptive field responses for a visual observer that views objects and spatio-temporal events in the environment. This treatment is developed over combinations of (i) uniform spatial scaling transformations, (ii) spatial affine transformations, (iii) Galilean transformations and (iv) temporal scaling transformations. By postulating that the family of receptive fields should be covariant under these classes of geometric image transformations, it follows that the receptive field shapes should be expanded over the degrees of freedom of the corresponding image transformations, to enable a formal matching between the receptive field responses computed under different viewing conditions for the same scene or for a structurally similar spatio-temporal event. We conclude the treatment by discussing and providing partial support for a working hypothesis that the receptive fields of simple cells in the primary visual cortex ought to be covariant under these classes of geometric image transformations, and thus have the shapes of their receptive fields expanded over the degrees of freedom of the corresponding geometric image transformations.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2026

DRIADA: an open-source Python toolkit for linking single-neuron selectivity and population activity to behavior

Understanding how individual neurons contribute to population activity during behavior is central to understanding brain functions across biological scales. We developed DRIADA, an open-source Python toolkit that connects analyses of individual neurons, population activity, and neuronal networks to the same behavioral parameters. We evaluated it on synthetic populations with known ground truth, calcium-imaging recordings from dorsal hippocampal CA1 in 13 mice across 39 sessions, and a simulated continuous attractor neural network (CANN) with known toroidal organization. Across most hippocampal sessions, embeddings of spatially selective neurons predicted held-out position better than equally sized random subsets and all recorded neurons. The same workflow related population dimensions back to individual neurons, including cells without detected selectivity for the measured behavioral variables. In the simulated network, complementary analyses captured features consistent with its known organization. Thus, DRIADA provides a common framework for relating neuronal selectivity, population structure, and network activity to behavioral dynamics.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2026

Alignment of visual brain encoding models with individual perceptual similarity judgments

Encoding models that predict brain activation responses to images have traditionally been trained to maximize accuracy when predicting observed brain data. However, their internal representations may not reflect individual human perception. In this work, we investigate whether we can fine-tune brain encoding models to better align their representations with individuals' similarity judgments. Using similarity judgments of 100 images from 8 participants in the Natural Scenes Dataset (NSD), we adapt a generic human similarity judgment model (DreamSim) separately for each participant to obtain personalized perceptual similarity models. These models are then used to obtain subject-specific similarity structure across images in their encoding model training sets. We fine-tune each participant's baseline encoder in two conditions, aligning its representations with either generic or personalized similarity judgments, with the same initialization and objective. We find that baseline brain encoders reflect within-subject perceptual similarity more strongly than measured fMRI responses and preserve intersubject correlations present in measured fMRI, but fail to reflect those of human perceptual similarity judgments. Fine-tuning with generic, population-level perceptual similarity information results in better alignment with human judgments than baseline encoders, but these models still fail to capture intersubject correlations of human judgments. However, fine-tuning with personalized perceptual similarity information results in models that are the most aligned with human perceptual similarity judgments and also reflect intersubject correlations of human judgments. Our framework provides an approach for bootstrapping human similarity judgment data into more individualized, human-aligned brain encoding models of vision.

q-bio.NC↗