arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.28289

CPVB-RG: Cross-Prior Visual Bridging for Prior-Aware Chest X-Ray Report Generation

Sike Xiang·Shuang Chen·Julie Cox·Amir Atapour-Abarghouei
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Radiologists interpret follow-up chest X-rays by comparing current and prior examinations to identify new, resolved or progressing findings. Most report generation systems either omit this longitudinal context or fuse prior features without distinguishing interval changes from anatomy that remains stable over time. We propose CPVB-RG, a prior-aware framework that combines current and prior radiographs with available clinical text. Its Cross-Prior Visual Bridge (CPVB) contains Progression-Guided Focus Attention (PGFA) and two Cross-Attention units. PGFA is designed to contrast progression-difference attention with shared-spatial attention, aiming to reduce invariant responses whilst retaining coarse spatial correspondence between examinations. The Cross-Attention units then connect the resulting longitudinal visual evidence with clinical semantics. CPVB-RG is trained in two stages, using prior-guided image-text alignment followed by autoregressive report generation with a lightweight language decoder. Experiments on MIMIC-CXR and IU X-Ray show consistent improvements across language and clinical metrics. On MIMIC-CXR, CPVB-RG achieves 0.2847 F1RadGraph and 0.6692 VLScore, with statistically significant gains over the closest decoder-matched prior-aware baseline. These results support the effectiveness of the proposed difference-aware and spatially guided fusion design for prior-aware chest X-ray report generation.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sike Xiang, Shuang Chen, Julie Cox, Amir Atapour-Abarghouei. 2026-10-20. CPVB-RG: Cross-Prior Visual Bridging for Prior-Aware Chest X-Ray Report Generation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28289

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bilateral Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Flatter Minima

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) enhances generalization by reducing a Max-Sharpness (MaxS). Despite the practical success, we empirically found that the MAxS behind SAM's generalization enhancements face the "Flatness Indicator Problem" (FIP), where SAM only considers the flatness in the direction of gradient ascent, resulting in a next minimization region that is not sufficiently flat. A better Flatness Indicator (FI) would bring a better generalization of neural networks. Because SAM is a greedy search method in nature. In this paper, we propose to utilize the difference between the training loss and the minimum loss over the neighborhood surrounding the current weight, which we denote as Min-Sharpness (MinS). By merging MaxS and MinS, we created a better FI that indicates a flatter direction during the optimization. Specially, we combine this FI with SAM into the proposed Bilateral SAM (BSAM) which finds a more flatter minimum than that of SAM. The theoretical analysis proves that BSAM converges to local minima. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BSAM offers superior generalization performance and robustness compared to vanilla SAM across various tasks, i.e., classification, transfer learning, human pose estimation, and network quantization.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Understanding Transformer-Based Vision Models via Modular Feature Inversion

Understanding the internal mechanisms of deep neural networks remains a central challenge in machine learning. In computer vision, one promising yet only preliminarily explored approach is feature inversion via inverse networks, which reconstructs images from intermediate representations using trained inverse networks. In this study, we revisit feature inversion via inverse networks, introducing a novel, modular variant that enables a computationally more efficient application of the technique while, in some cases, producing semantically more coherent image reconstructions. We apply our method to large-scale transformer-based vision models, specifically Detection Transformer, Vision Transformer, Swin Transformer, and Data-Efficient Image Transformer, analyzing the resulting reconstructions across network depth. Our main analysis compares Detection Transformer and Vision Transformer, which exhibit the most informative differences among the evaluated architectures. At the same time, results for Swin Transformer and Data-Efficient Image Transformer support the broader applicability of our framework. Our findings reveal gradual representational changes across transformer layers as a shared characteristic of Detection Transformer and Vision Transformer, as well as systematic differences in how they preserve contextual shape and fine-grained image details, and in their robustness to color perturbations. These findings deepen understanding of transformer-based vision models and demonstrate the utility of modular feature inversion as an interpretability tool.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs

Humans develop perception through a bottom-up hierarchy: from basic primitives and Gestalt principles to high-level semantics. Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are trained directly on complex downstream tasks. Does it guarantee their performance on these foundational visual capabilities? To systematically investigate this gap, we introduce VisFacor, a benchmark that digitizes 20 vision-centric subtests from FRCT, a well-established cognitive psychology assessment spanning four domains of human visual cognition. Furthermore, we design algorithms to automatically construct and validate unlimited test cases with controllable difficulty. Using VisFacor, we evaluate 39 frontier MLLMs, including both proprietary (e.g., GPT, Gemini) and open-source (e.g., LLaMA, Qwen) models. The best model achieves a score of only 55.9%. Analysis reveals good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and construct validity (compared to existing vision benchmarks). Models consistently fail on tasks such as mental rotation, spatial relation inference, and figure-ground discrimination, regardless of model size or prompting strategy. These findings suggest that performance improvements on existing general benchmarks might represent castles in the air instead of a genuine mastery of human-like visual cognition.

cs.CV↗