arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.28241

ARRIVAL in cube-root subexponential time

Ebrahim Ghorbani·Raul Lopes·Matthias Mnich
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the ARRIVAL problem, a token travels through a switch digraph: at every vertex, it leaves along one of two out-arcs, and the two are used alternately. The question is which of two terminals the token reaches first. ARRIVAL lies in $\mathsf{NP} \cap \mathsf{coNP}$, but no polynomial-time algorithm is known.The fastest known algorithms turn some vertices into terminals and search for consistent guesses of the numbers of tokens that these vertices send out. The first, due to Gärtner et al. [ICALP 2021], searches all vertices at once with an algorithm for fixed points of monotone maps, and the second, due to Haslebacher [ICALP 2025], searches one vertex at a time by binary search. Both search for a fixed point of the same map, which returns how many tokens arrive at the guessed vertices. We guess the vertices in blocks of $k$, between these two extremes, which needs a search in $k$ dimensions with few evaluations of this map. To do so, we build on the connection between ARRIVAL and $\ell_1$-contractions established in the second of these works. We search with $\ell_1$-centerpoints of the remaining guesses, which are guaranteed to exist by Haslebacher et al. [FOCS 2025], and which we approximate deterministically. In order to prove our results, we show how to find the least fixed points of maps from $\{0, \ldots, N\}^k$ to itself that have unit increments. For ARRIVAL on $n$-vertex switch digraphs, this gives run time $2^{\mathcal{O}(n^{1/3} \cdot \log^{2/3} n)}$, improving the previous time bound of $n^{\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{n})}$. We work with the more general \garrival problem, with many tokens and several terminals, and solve it in the same time when there are at most $2^n$ tokens.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ebrahim Ghorbani, Raul Lopes, Matthias Mnich. 2026-10-20. ARRIVAL in cube-root subexponential time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28241

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Shaving Logs via Large Sieve Inequality: Faster Algorithms for Sparse Convolution and More

In sparse convolution-type problems, a common technique is to hash the input integers modulo a random prime $p\in [Q/2,Q]$ for some parameter $Q$, which reduces the range of the input integers while preserving their additive structure. However, this hash family suffers from two drawbacks, which led to bottlenecks in many state-of-the-art algorithms: (1) The collision probability of two elements from $[N]$ is $O(\frac{\log N}{Q})$ rather than $O(\frac{1}{Q})$; (2) It is difficult to derandomize the choice of $p$; known derandomization techniques lead to super-logarithmic overhead [Chan, Lewenstein STOC'15]. In this paper, we partially overcome these drawbacks in certain scenarios, via novel applications of the large sieve inequality from analytic number theory. Consequently, we obtain the following improved algorithms for various problems (in the standard word RAM model): Sparse Nonnegative Convolution: We obtain an $O(t\log t)$-time Las Vegas algorithm that computes the convolution $A\star B$ of two nonnegative integer vectors $A,B$, where $t$ is the output sparsity $\|A\star B\|_0$. Moreover, our algorithm terminates in $O(t\log t)$ time with $1-1/\mathrm{poly}(t)$ probability. Text-to-Pattern Hamming Distances: Given a length-$m$ pattern $P$ and a length-$n$ text $T$, we obtain a deterministic $O(n\sqrt{m\log \log m})$-time algorithm that exactly computes the Hamming distance between $P$ and every length-$m$ substring of $T$. Sparse General Convolution: We also give a Monte Carlo $O(t\log t)$ time algorithm for sparse convolution with possibly negative input in the restricted case where the length $N$ of the input vectors satisfies $N\le t^{1.99}$.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

${\varepsilon}$-Cost Sharding: Scaling Hypergraph-Based Data Structures to Trillions of Keys

We describe a simple and yet very scalable implementation of static functions (VFunc) and of static filters (VFilter) based on hypergraphs. We introduce the idea of $\varepsilon$-cost sharding, which allows us to build structures that can manage trillions of keys, at the same time increasing memory locality in hypergraph-based constructions. Contrarily to the commonly used HEM sharding method, $\varepsilon$-cost sharding does not require to store of additional information, and does not introduce dependencies in the computation chain; its only cost is that of few arithmetical instructions, and of a relative increase $\varepsilon$ in space usage. We apply $\varepsilon$-cost sharding to the classical MWHC construction, but we obtain the best result by combining Dietzfelbinger and Walzer's fuse graphs for large shards with lazy Gaussian elimination for small shards. We obtain large structures with an overhead of 10.5% with respect to the information-theoretical lower bound and with a query time that is a few nanoseconds away from the query time of the non-sharded version, which is the fastest currently available within the same space bounds. Besides comparing our structures with a non-sharded version, we contrast its tradeoffs with bumped ribbon constructions, a space-saving alternative to hypergraph-based static functions and filters, which provide optimum space consumption but slow construction and query time (though construction can be parallelized very efficiently). We build offline a trillion-key filter using commodity hardware in just 60 ns/key. Finally, we show that $\varepsilon$-cost sharding and fuse graphs carry over with no effort to data structures that reduce to static functions, such as monotone minimal perfect hash functions and compressed static functions.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Algorithms for Computing Longest Unbordered Factors on Run-Length Encoded Strings

A border of a string is a non-empty proper prefix of the string that is also a suffix. A string is called unbordered if it has no border. The longest unbordered factor is a fundamental notion in stringology, closely related to string periodicity. This paper addresses the longest unbordered factor problem: given a string of length $n$, the goal is to compute its longest factor that is unbordered. While recent work has achieved subquadratic and near-linear time algorithms for this problem, the best known worst-case time complexity remains $O(n \log n)$ [Kociumaka et al., ISAAC 2018]. In this paper, we investigate the problem in the context of compressed string processing, focusing specifically on run-length encoded (RLE) strings. We first present a simple yet crucial structural observation relating unbordered factors and RLE-compressed strings. Building on this, we propose an algorithm that solves the problem in $O(m^{1.5} \log^2 m)$ time and $O(m \log^2 m)$ space, where $m$ is the size of the RLE-compressed input string. Furthermore, we propose another algorithm for the problem that runs in average $O(m \log^2 m)$ time and $O(m\log m)$ space: The average-case bound holds under an exponent-bounded random-input model, in which the input is chosen uniformly from the strings of RLE size $m$ whose run exponents are at most a given bound $E\geq 2$. Our approaches extend key ideas from [Gawrychowski et al., SPIRE 2015] to the RLE setting through new combinatorial insights. When the RLE size $m$ is sufficiently small compared to $n$, our algorithms achieve linear-time behavior in $n$, potentially leading to improved performance over existing methods in such cases.

cs.DS↗