arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.28184

Perceives but Doesn't Brake: A Perception-Action Binding Gap in Reasoning Driving VLAs

Matteo Cercola·Katie Z Luo·Simone Formentin·Marco Pavone
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Reasoning-augmented vision-language-action (VLA) driving models can perceive and reason about safety-critical hazards yet fail to translate that evidence into safe actions. We characterize this failure as a perception-action binding gap: hazard information is available inside the model but exerts insufficient control over trajectory generation. Using matched simulated counterfactuals and logged driving replay, we show that in-path hazards are actually encoded in the visual representation, but longitudinal plans are dominated by ego-speed history and respond only weakly to hazard proximity or the model's own reasoning trace. Further analysis shows that the trajectory generator is capable of braking but sometimes fails to do so due to the perception-action binding gap. Without retraining or modifying any weights, we inject a hazard-conditioned energy into the frozen flow-matching sampler of Alpamayo-1.5, restoring the missing coupling at generation time. With exact obstacle geometry, guidance cuts footprint intrusion from 58.1% to 14.5% and recovers safe braking whenever sufficient stopping distance remains, eliminating collisions entirely in our braking-relevant closed-loop battery. It also reverses the diagnosed dependence of the plan, from tracking ego speed to responding to obstacle range. These results separate hazard perception from hazard control in driving VLAs, show that unsafe behavior can arise even when the model has both the evidence and the ability to act on it, and propose a simple fix for bridging this binding gap.

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matteo Cercola, Katie Z Luo, Simone Formentin, Marco Pavone. 2026-10-20. Perceives but Doesn't Brake: A Perception-Action Binding Gap in Reasoning Driving VLAs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28184

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Synergistic Action and Style Priors for Learning Legged Locomotion

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) enables robots to learn complex behaviors through interaction with the environment. However, due to the unrestricted nature of the learning algorithms, the resulting solutions are often brittle and appear unnatural. This is especially true for learning direct joint-level torque control, as inductive biases are difficult to integrate into the learning process. We propose an inductive bias for learning locomotion that is especially useful for torque control: latent actions learned from a small dataset of expert demonstrations. This prior allows the policy to directly leverage knowledge contained in the expert's actions and facilitates more efficient exploration. We observe that the agent is not restricted to the reward levels of the demonstration, and performance in transfer tasks is improved significantly. Latent action priors combined with style rewards for imitation lead to a closer replication of the expert's behavior. Videos are available at https://sites.google.com/view/latent-action-priors.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Kamino: GPU-based Simulation of Rigid Multi-Body Physics with Kinematic Loops

We present Kamino, a GPU-based physics solver for massively parallel simulations of heterogeneous highly-coupled mechanical systems. Implemented in Python using NVIDIA Warp and integrated into the Newton framework, it enables the application of data-driven methods, such as large-scale reinforcement learning, to complex robotic systems that exhibit strongly coupled kinematic and dynamic constraints such as kinematic loops. The latter are often circumvented by approximating the system's topology as a kinematic tree, and incorporating explicit loop-closure constraints or so-called mimic joints. Kamino aims at alleviating this burden by natively supporting these types of couplings. Moreover, Kamino supports heterogeneous worlds, allowing for batched simulation of structurally diverse robots on a single GPU. At its core lies a state-of-the-art constrained optimization algorithm based on ADMM, which computes constraint forces by solving the constrained rigid multi-body forward dynamics transcribed as a nonlinear complementarity problem. This leads to high-fidelity simulations that resolve contact dynamics without resorting to approximate models that simplify or convexify the problem. We demonstrate RL policy training on a biped with six nested kinematic loops, generating a feasible walking policy while simulating $4{,}096$ parallel environments on a single GPU.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Not All Features Are Created Equal: A Mechanistic Study of Vision-Language-Action Models

A fine-tuned Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policy can easily place the alphabet soup in the basket on command, just as it saw during fine-tuning. However, if the basket is shifted five centimeters to the left, it drops the soup off the table. We developed an interpretability pipeline to investigate what such a policy is computing. Injecting task A's activations into the action expert while the policy looks at task B's scene makes pi0.5 execute task A's motor trajectory in 99.6\% of episodes ($n{=}1{,}968$). The injected program is bound to absolute workspace coordinates and ignores the visible scene, which provides a mechanistic account of the perturbation brittleness that concurrent benchmarks report. The binding holds on a physical UR10e: directed replay redirects the commanded task in 26/26 rollouts in one direction and 18/26 in the other, with no-injection and random-direction controls at the floor, and once the source object is moved 10--15\,cm the arm grasps and releases at the recorded coordinates in 50/50 trials, picking up the wrong block when one sits there and closing on empty air when none does. Applying the same interventions to six VLAs on LIBERO, MetaWorld, SimplerEnv, and ALOHA over 420{,}000+ rollouts yields three further findings: every architecture encodes the instruction, and four of the five weight it below vision whenever the scene alone identifies the goal; under the standard replacement write-back the SAE pooling that preserves behavior is architecture-specific (pi0.5 per-token, SmolVLA indifferent), and goal selection and motor generation separate into VLM and expert pathways wherever the two are distinguishable. We release \textbf{Action Atlas} (https://action-atlas.com), an interactive platform covering all 520+ trained SAEs, 79 identified concepts, and the scored UR10e rollouts. Code: https://github.com/CWRU-AISM/action-atlas

cs.RO↗