Where Has the Foreign Signal Gone?

Piyush Akimitsu; Ulrich Hounyo

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.28175

Where Has the Foreign Signal Gone?

Piyush Akimitsu·Ulrich Hounyo

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We compare the relation between sentiment noise in the Twitter feed and losses for stocks of domestic and foreign firms. The mean quarterly domestic-foreign difference in the slope of next-quarter losses on measured noise is -1.40 (Newey-West t = -2.99). This slope is negative for 78 and 48 percent of the quarters for domestic and foreign stocks, respectively (block-bootstrap p = 0.016). Thus, this relationship is temporally more stable for domestic stocks. We use a noisy rational expectations model to explain these patterns through the composition of the contributor pool. The feeds for stocks of foreign firms have higher repeat-author concentration and a larger model-implied nonfundamental component than those for domestic firms. We interpret these differences through the producer-knowledge mismatch hypothesis. For foreign firms, the English-language contributor pool underrepresents the home-market investors who tend to possess informational advantages about them. Thus, the foreign signal is not gone but diluted.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM stat.ML

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Piyush Akimitsu, Ulrich Hounyo. 2026-10-20. Where Has the Foreign Signal Gone?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28175

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Aware Inference in Regularized Regression Models

We consider inference on a scalar regression coefficient under a constraint on the magnitude of the control coefficients. A class of estimators based on a regularized propensity score regression is shown to exactly solve a tradeoff between worst-case bias and variance. We derive confidence intervals (CIs) based on these estimators that are bias-aware: they account for the possible bias of the estimator. Under homoskedastic Gaussian errors, these estimators and CIs are near-optimal in finite samples for mean squared error and CI length. We also provide conditions for asymptotic validity of the CIs with an unknown and possibly heteroskedastic error distribution, and derive novel optimal rates of convergence under high-dimensional asymptotics that allow the number of regressors to increase more quickly than the number of observations. Extensive simulations and two empirical applications illustrate the performance of our methods.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Estimating Nonseparable Selection Models: A Functional Contraction Approach

We propose a novel method for estimating nonseparable selection models. We show that, for a given selection function and under suitable contraction conditions, the potential outcome distributions are nonparametrically identified from the selected outcome distributions and can be recovered using a simple iterative algorithm. This result enables a full-information approach to estimating selection models without imposing parametric or separability assumptions on the outcome equation. We propose a two-step estimation strategy for the potential outcome distributions and the parameters of the selection function and establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of the resulting estimators. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that our approach performs well in finite samples. The method is applicable to a wide range of empirical settings, including consumer demand models with only transaction prices, auctions with stochastic winning rules and incomplete bid data, and Roy-type models with data on accepted wages.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Good Controls Gone Bad: Difference-in-Differences with Covariates

This paper introduces the common causality of covariates (CCC) assumption in difference-in-differences with covariates. This assumption stipulates that covariates must have common effects on untreated potential outcomes across regions and periods. We also introduce Integrated Parallel Trends, a weaker alternative to conditional parallel trends that does not require point-wise equality of trends across covariate values, and can accommodate CCC violations. Pre-trend diagnostics for integrated parallel trends may reveal plausibly parallel trends that are obscured under conventional conditional parallel trends diagnostics, thereby broadening the set of empirical settings in which credible DID identification may be possible. Furthermore, we propose a new estimator called the Integrated Difference-in-Differences (DID-INT) estimator, which can identify the ATT when integrated parallel trends holds and the CCC assumption is violated. The DID-INT estimator can also accommodate treatment-effect heterogeneity with respect to covariates and compositional changes, while avoiding forbidden comparisons in staggered adoption settings.

econ.EM↗