arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.27879

Space Complexity of Reachability in Simple Path Graphs

Krishnamoorthy Dinesh·Chandana Sasidharan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

One of the central questions in space complexity is whether nondeterministic logspace computations ($\textsf{NL}$) can be simulated in unambiguous logspace ($\textsf{UL}$). A stronger notion, \emph{reach unambiguity} ($\textsf{RUL} \subseteq \textsf{UL} \cap \textsf{co}\textsf{UL}$), requires every configuration reachable from the start to have exactly one computation path (Buntrock et.al. 91). While directed graph reachability is $\textsf{NL}$-complete, planar graph reachability is in $\textsf{UL}$ and undirected graph reachability is in deterministic logspace ($\textsf{L}$). In this work, we study the space complexity of reachability problem for restricted directed graph families and show the following. - For reach unambiguous graphs (graphs with at most one path from start vertex to every vertex), Lange (Lange 97) showed that reachability is in $\textsf{RUL}$. As our main result, we show that for simple path graphs (introduced in Kannan et.al. 08), which contains reach unambiguous graphs), where each vertex has at most one simple path from the start, we show that the reachability problem lies in $\textsf{UL} \cap \textsf{co}\textsf{UL}$. - Our first result can also be equivalently stated as: the recognition problem for simple path is in $\textsf{UL} \cap \textsf{co}\textsf{UL}$ if and only if the reachability problem restricted to simple path graphs is also in $\textsf{UL} \cap \textsf{co}\textsf{UL}$. Inspired by this, we investigate the complexity of graph recognition versus graph reachability for graph classes. Observe that for any graph class, solving reachability (for the class) also solves the recognition problem for that class. We show that for reach unambiguous graphs, solving recognition is as hard as solving reachability (making both of them $\textsf{RUL}$-complete). (Abstract shortened to meet arXiv limits)

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Krishnamoorthy Dinesh, Chandana Sasidharan. 2026-10-20. Space Complexity of Reachability in Simple Path Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27879

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Separating Circuits: Switching Lemmas and Random Restrictions

Non-uniform circuit complexity classifies Boolean functions by the size and depth of the gate networks required to compute them. Because $\mathsf{P} \subseteq \mathsf{P/poly}$, proving super-polynomial circuit lower bounds for $\mathsf{NP}$ problems offers a combinatorial route toward separating $\mathsf{P}$ from $\mathsf{NP}$, formalized by the Karp-Lipton theorem ($\mathsf{NP} \subseteq \mathsf{P/poly} \implies \mathsf{PH} = Σ_2^p$). While general circuit lower bounds for explicit functions in $\mathsf{NP}$ remain linear, exponential lower bounds hold for bounded-depth circuits via random restrictions and polynomial approximations. We give a self-contained treatment of both paradigms and their consequences. First, we establish Shannon's counting lower bound, Lupanov's $(1+o(1))2^n/n$ synthesis upper bound, and the Karp-Lipton theorem via SAT self-reducibility. Second, we prove Håstad's Switching Lemma via Razborov's canonical decision-tree encoding, showing that a $k$-CNF or $k$-DNF under a $p$-random restriction collapses to decision-tree depth less than $s$ except with probability at most $(5pk)^s$, and derive the optimal $2^{Ω(n^{1/(d-1)})}$ lower bound (and matching $O(n 2^{n^{1/(d-1)}})$ upper bound) for Parity in depth-$d$ $\mathsf{AC}^0$. Third, we present the Razborov-Smolensky method over $\mathbb{F}_p$, proving that $\mathrm{MOD}_q \notin \mathsf{AC}^0[p]$ for distinct primes $p \neq q$ and establishing a $2^{Ω(n^{1/(2d)})}$ lower bound for Parity against $\mathsf{AC}^0[3]$. Finally, we examine structured restrictions for $k$-Clique and average-case depth hierarchies, four consequences of the Switching Lemma -- oracle separations of $\mathsf{PH}$ from $\mathsf{PSPACE}$, Linial-Mansour-Nisan Fourier concentration, Nisan-Wigderson pseudorandom generators, and $\mathsf{AC}^0$-SAT algorithms -- and the Razborov-Rudich Natural Proofs barrier.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Classifying Approximation Algorithms: Understanding the APX Complexity Class

Many NP-hard optimization problems that are equivalent under Karp reductions behave very differently when we ask for polynomial-time approximations. This paper studies the complexity class APX, a subclass of NPO consisting of optimization problems that admit polynomial-time algorithms with constant-factor approximation guarantees. We first review the formal structure of NPO, define L-reductions and PTAS-reductions, and prove that L-reductions preserve polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTAS). Using the Probabilistically Checkable Proofs (PCP) theorem as a starting point, we present self-contained L-reductions establishing the APX-completeness of Max-3SAT, Max-2SAT, Max-NAE-3SAT, and Max-Cut, and we situate APX within the broader hierarchy FPTAS, PTAS, APX, logAPX, and polyAPX. We then examine structural consequences of the polynomial hierarchy for self-improvability and APX-intermediate problems such as Min-Bin-Packing, and review how APX-hardness arises in Bayesian optimal mechanism design for three-bidder single-item auctions. Turning to algorithm design, we analyze three core techniques across the APX and logAPX boundary: linear programming relaxation with Raghavan-Thompson randomized rounding for multicommodity congestion minimization, Goemans-Williamson semidefinite programming rounding for Max-Cut, and greedy, dual-fitting, and randomized rounding methods for Min-Set-Cover. We close by discussing bounded-query approximation oracles and recent constant-factor and sub-3/2 advances on the asymmetric and metric traveling salesman problems.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Fine-Grained $\mathsf{AC}^0$ Lower Bounds for $k$-OV, $k$-XOR, and $k$-SUM via Colored Subgraph Isomorphism

We study the circuit cost of selecting $k$ objects satisfying orthogonality, zero XOR, or modular zero SUM. Our main lower bounds in nonuniform $\mathsf{AC}^0$ use a common framework of depth-zero projections from colored subgraph isomorphism. The projections use dimension, row count, or bit width $O(k\log n)$ and preserve circuit size, depth, and gate orientation. OV inputs satisfy pairwise distinctness within each array. Our direct XOR bounds require odd $k$, while SUM admits both parities. Stronger lower bounds for suitable source patterns transfer through the same framework to all three targets. For every fixed depth $d$ and sufficiently large fixed $k$, we prove unconditional lower bounds $n^{Ω(k)}$ for OV and $(n/k)^{Ω(k)}$ for XOR and SUM, with an absolute constant in the exponent independent of $d$ and $k$; only the threshold on $n$ may depend on $(d,k)$. For $k\to\infty$ with $k=n^{o(1)}$, combining our projections with Beame's small-clique lower bound yields $n^{Ω_d(\min\{\sqrt{k},\log n\})}$ at every fixed depth $d$. We strengthen the exponent to $Ω(k)$ at depth two in both orientations and at depth three with a top disjunction. The depth-three result allows unrestricted bottom fan-in and literal polarity; its proof bounds the probability that a planted copy forms a minterm of an arbitrary fixed CNF over a random background.

cs.CC↗