arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.27739

Make the Adversary Spend More Energy: Generative Deception against Language-Model Attackers in Critical Infrastructure

Vlad Mihal·Hosam Alamleh·Alessandro Cantelli-Forti
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Language-model attackers consume computational resources as they explore and interact with a target, creating an opportunity for cyber deception to impose costs. Whether such engagements favor the defender requires measuring both sides. We evaluate an autonomous language-model attacker against a decoy that uses a defending language model to analyze attacker commands and select defensive responses. Across 330 sessions, eight model pairs, two attacker profiles and three counter-injection levels, both sides run on identical GPUs and their energy is measured above idle. With runtime thinking disabled, the attacker-to-defender energy ratio has a 95% interval above one in 41 of 48 configurations under an allocation excluding attacker diagnostic calls, and in all 48 when those calls are included. Token ratios remain within approximately a factor of two in configurations without generation-cap truncation, showing that token counts can obscure substantial energy asymmetry. Counter-injection increases attacker tokens by approximately 9% per level without a detectable pooled change in energy consumption. Enabling thinking on both sides increases defender energy by 8--17 times and reverses the exchange for one model pair in the original campaign. We use these findings to motivate a proposed SCADA deception architecture with private physical state per identified adversary and deterministic protocol and process emulation.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.SYeess.SY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vlad Mihal, Hosam Alamleh, Alessandro Cantelli-Forti. 2026-10-20. Make the Adversary Spend More Energy: Generative Deception against Language-Model Attackers in Critical Infrastructure. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27739

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Can You Trust the Vectors in Your Vector Database? Black-Hole Attack from Embedding Space Defects

Vector databases serve as the retrieval backbone of modern AI applications, yet their security remains largely unexplored. We propose the Black-Hole Attack, a poisoning attack that injects a small number of malicious vectors near the geometric center of the stored vectors. These injected vectors attract queries like a black hole and frequently appear in the top-k retrieval results for most queries. This attack is enabled by a phenomenon we term centrality-driven hubness: in high-dimensional embedding spaces, vectors near the centroid become nearest neighbors of a disproportionately large number of other vectors, while this centroid region is nearly empty in practice. The attack shows that vectors in a vector database cannot be blindly trusted: geometric defects in high-dimensional embeddings make retrieval inherently vulnerable. Based on this insight, we propose four attack paths tailored to different attacker capabilities. Our experiments show that up to 94.4% of queries are successfully attacked. Additionally, we study two directions of defense: hubness mitigation and detection-based filtering. Hubness mitigation either significantly reduces retrieval accuracy or provides only limited protection, while the detection-based defense is effective against some attack paths but fails against others. A robust and adaptive defense thus remains an open problem, and our findings indicate that vector databases require more careful treatment of security.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Anywhere, Any-Stymie: Remote Activation of Trojan Malware on LiDAR with Modulated Signals

LiDAR sensors are widely deployed in autonomous systems for safety-critical 3D perception. We identify a previously unexplored attack surface in which dormant malware, embedded in the LiDAR sensing pipeline, remains inactive during normal operation and is triggered externally after deployment, without access to sensor hardware or networking at attack time. This malware was developed in a closed research test environment with vendor technical support, rather than by exploiting an inherent production supply-chain vulnerability. To trigger the malware, we repurpose the sensor's own native dual-return signal processing as a covert channel for a modulated optical signal delivered into the environment. Once triggered, the malware performs false data injection and suppression on static and mobile platforms. Unlike optical spoofing, where the transmitted signal is itself the attack, here it carries only a small key that the sensor decodes with existing signal processing. We establish feasibility with static triggering at 300~ft and drive-by runs reaching 35 mph, and verify that injected artifacts are taken up as detections by a fine-tuned 3D object detector. On a deployed tactical autonomous vehicle running an unmodified production autonomy stack, we demonstrate both fail-safe and fail-dangerous impact: emergency stop, mission abort, and collision. These results motivate stronger integrity guarantees across LiDAR development and deployment pipelines.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

VeriRouter: Towards Verifiable LLM Routing

Large language model (LLM) routers are increasingly deployed to optimize quality, latency, and cost through dynamic model selection and request rewriting. However, a compromised router can cause ineligible selection on the control plane, unendorsed rewriting or unfaithful relay on the data plane, undermining LLM routing integrity. We present VeriRouter, a verifiable LLM routing framework. Under an endorsed public context binding a private semantic index and rewrite banks, VeriRouter combines ZK proofs with a provider-issued serving certificate to establish integrity across both planes while keeping the router's private routing assets hidden from clients. For model selection, we design an efficient ZK proof for semantic search. For rewriting, local checks enforce message preservation and additions from committed banks. On real-world workloads, VeriRouter's model-selection and rewrite proofs average 21.92~s and 4.24~s, yielding 1,307$\times$ and 101$\times$ speedups over the fastest completing baselines. Relative to serving without verification, VeriRouter adds only 4.08 s under per-turn selection and 0.11 s under session-pinned selection.

cs.CR↗