arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.26598

TapID: Rapid touch interaction in virtual reality using wearable sensing

Abstract

Current Virtual Reality systems typically use cameras to capture user input from controllers or free-hand mid-air interaction. In this paper, we argue that this is a key impediment to productivity scenarios in VR, which require continued interaction over prolonged periods of time---a requirement that controller or free-hand input in mid-air does not satisfy. To address this challenge, we bring rapid touch interaction on surfaces to Virtual Reality---the input modality that users have grown used to on phones and tablets for continued use. We present TapID, a wrist-based inertial sensing system that complements headset-tracked hand poses to trigger input in VR. TapID embeds a pair of inertial sensors in a flexible strap, one at either side of the wrist; from the combination of registered signals, TapID reliably detects surface touch events and, more importantly, identifies the finger used for touch. We evaluated TapID in a series of userstudies on event-detection accuracy (F1 = 0.997) and hand-agnostic finger-identification accuracy (within-user: F1 = 0.93; across users: F1 = 0.91 after 10 refinement taps and F1 = 0.87 without refinement) in a seated table scenario. We conclude with a series of applications that complement hand tracking with touch input and that are uniquely enabled by TapID, including UI control, rapid keyboard typing and piano playing, as well as surface gestures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Manuel Meier, Paul Streli, Andreas Fender, Christian Holz. 2026-10-19. TapID: Rapid touch interaction in virtual reality using wearable sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/vr50410.2021.00076

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

FlexMind: Supporting Deeper Creative Thinking with LLMs

Expert ideation requires more than generating ideas. People must articulate trade-offs, develop mitigations, and compare parallel directions, yet this reasoning process is cognitively demanding. Existing ideation tools fall short by either focusing only on expanding or organizing the idea space, or by offering evaluations without supporting mitigation generation and continued reasoning over newly introduced trade-offs. We present FlexMind, an AI-augmented system that proactively scaffolds multi-threaded trade-off-mitigation chains within a structured workspace. FlexMind helps users surface concrete trade-offs, generate actionable mitigations, and navigate and expand multiple idea branches. In a controlled study (n=20), FlexMind supported deeper exploration without sacrificing breadth and produced higher-quality ideas, as judged by domain experts, compared to a baseline. A case study with six experts (n=6) further reveals how FlexMind supports idea analysis while helping uncover new solutions. These results inform implications for enhancing human-AI co-creation.

cs.HC↗

ZORO: Active Controls to Support Rule Following in Vibe Coding

Rules files (e.g., AGENTS$.$md, CLAUDE$.$md) are the primary mechanism for human-agent alignment when developers vibe code. However, they remain passive: it is not immediately apparent when rules are being used or followed, or how to improve them. To transform rules from passive text into active controls, we introduce ZORO, an interactive interface that integrates directly with a coding agent and anchors rules to every step of the coding process. After an agent generates an initial plan, ZORO enriches the plan with rules, enforces the rules during implementation by requiring the agent prove that each rule was followed, and allows users to provide in-situ feedback when they are unsatisfied with a rule application to evolve the ruleset. A technical evaluation shows that coding agents follow rules more with ZORO than without. A user study demonstrates a change in people's behavior and cognitive strategies when rules are at the forefront of vibe coding. We discuss how making rules active in agentic systems unlocks broader opportunities for human-agent alignment in coding settings and beyond.

cs.HC↗

Calibrating LLM Judges for Human and AI Conversations

Measuring how successful a conversation is remains difficult, even for humans judging spoken dialogue. We evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs as pointwise and pairwise judges of conversational success on CANDOR, finding pointwise scoring correlates moderately with human ratings, while pairwise comparison suffers from long transcripts and positional bias. Since this leaves judge scores incomparable across models, we propose a small anchor set and a calibration function that calibrates any judge onto a shared, interpretable scale. We further release the Voice Arena Goal Dataset (VA), 200 task-oriented human-AI and human-agent conversations with pairwise annotations, revealing a substantial gap between current judges and human-level discrimination. Using VA, we test whether CANDOR-fitted calibration transfers to human-AI conversations, finding it brings judges onto a shared scale despite never observing VA during fitting.

cs.HC↗