arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.26456

Regime-Aware Interpretable Ranking for Sector Rotation

Abstract

Sector rotation is a common decision in benchmark-relative portfolio management, where portfolio managers rank sectors for overweight and underweight positions. We formulate this task as ranking sector actions by expected future risk-adjusted active performance, measured with forward sector-benchmark Sharpe ratios. Such rankings should preserve temporal information, express model outputs through economically familiar signal characteristics, account for changes in signal relevance across macroeconomic environments, and capture dependencies among sectors. We propose RegimeRank, an interpretable sector-ranking model that represents fundamental and technical signals through expert-defined temporal characteristics, conditions them on learned macro factors via cross-attention, and models cross-sector dependencies through self-attention. Expected-gradient attributions identify the contributions of individual signal-transformation pairs, while macroeconomic and cross-sector attention maps provide diagnostics of the learned conditioning and relational structure. We evaluate RegimeRank on weekly S&P 500 data from 2002 to 2024 under combinatorial purged cross-validation, where it outperforms representative ranking and machine-learning baselines across multiple ranking metrics. Ablation studies support the contributions of latent macro states, regime conditioning, and cross-sector modelling, while attribution and attention analyses illustrate the temporal characteristics, macro states, and sector relationships underlying its rankings.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kelvin J. L. Koa, Ziling Liu, Xinyang Li, Shuowei Feng, Ruoyu Liang, Mathieu Giroux, Eugene Y. Wen, Xuan Yao, Ke-Wei Huang, Hugo Lamarre. 2026-10-19. Regime-Aware Interpretable Ranking for Sector Rotation. https://doi.org/10.1145/3858063.3858823

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

When Values-Based Screens Disagree: Continuous Shariah Compliance and Classification Dynamics

Does the design of a values-based screening rule generate eligibility changes when reported accounting inputs remain unchanged but market valuations move? We apply seven Shariah financial-screening rulebooks to 1.34 million U.S. security-months from 1999 to 2024 on a common, threshold-anchored scale. Applied retrospectively, the full emulations disagree on 35.9% of complete permissible-sector observations (38.8% from 2015, when all were in force), and the financial-ratio screens alone on 47.3%. Under AAOIFI's spot market-capitalisation denominator, market-capitalisation movement alone is sufficient for 65.6% of breaches, and half of denominator-driven breaches reverse within three months; numerator movement dominates under asset-based rules. Holding the threshold and sample fixed, a 24-month average denominator cuts debt-screen transitions from 2.51% to 1.03% a month, whereas raising the threshold barely matters. Among breaches of similar severity the reversal gap narrows but persists. Portfolio and fund-holdings evidence qualifies these findings: benefits are modest under a binding single-rule mandate.

q-fin.PM↗

On the utility problem in a market where price impact is transient

We consider a discrete-time model of a financial market where a risky asset is bought and sold with transactions having a transient price impact. It is shown that the corresponding utility maximization problem admits a solution. We manage to remove some unnatural restrictions on the market depth and resilience processes that were present in earlier work. A non-standard feature of the problem is that the set of attainable portfolio values may fail the convexity property.

q-fin.PM↗

Conformal Kelly: When Marginal Coverage Transfers and the Economics Do Not

We size portfolio positions from conformal prediction intervals, reading the interval half-width as the scale in a capped fractional-Kelly rule (Conformal Kelly), and evaluate the rule under a pre-registered protocol. The development record is an autonomous LLM-agent search over roughly 200 configurations on a single six-year window (2016-2021) of eight US-listed ETFs. All later data was sealed before the search, and two final configurations, nine comparison books and the mapping from outcomes to conclusions were registered before unsealing. On the sealed 2022-2024 window, realized coverage was 0.745 against a 0.750 target, but the two configurations' annualised net log growth was 8.5% and 7.0% (28.5% and 25.8% in development), below an unlevered equal-weight book (9.5%), the leveraged passive books (15.6-16.8%) and a registered hindsight four-equity book (10.8%, at a 46% drawdown); both ranked last of eleven entries on Sharpe and Calmar. A post-hoc split, outside the registered protocol, shows the passing coverage averaging 0.592 in 2022 and 0.842 afterwards, with the entire loss in the under-covered year. The split does not show that under-coverage caused the loss: the leverage cap bound on every 2022 trading day, so narrow intervals could not enlarge the book, and a long-equity book in an equity bear market is the simpler account. But the registered acceptance test passed a sixteen-point conditional failure, which motivates, without establishing, conditional coverage as an endpoint for rules that read interval width as a scale. On the development window, a slow per-asset conformal quantile out-grew every locally adaptive alternative tested, but only under a binding leverage cap, and block-bootstrap intervals include zero for 11 of the 13 contrasts we could re-derive.

q-fin.PM↗