How Much Does Auger Spectroscopy Add to XAS? A Fisher-information Analysis of Core-Hole Dynamics in $Ar^+$

Abstract

X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and resonant-Auger spectroscopy probe different stages of core-hole excitation and decay, but distinct spectra need not provide independent information about decay parameters. We quantify their complementarity for the $Ar^+$ $2p\to3d$ manifold using state-resolved atomic calculations and a two-parameter Fisher-information model. A common scale of primary autoionization rates $s_Γ$ and a selective spectator-$pp$ rescaling $η_{pp}$ both alter XAS linewidths. Their spectral responses are nearly collinear because the spectator-$pp$ fraction varies weakly among populated intermediate states. We compare XAS with an effective, scan-integrated, normalized Auger spectrum defined on a final-state-energy coordinate, with fixed excitation weights and final-state widths. Within this reduced observable, the common rate scale cancels from the normalized branching fractions, while $η_{pp}$ redistributes intensity among ionic final states. This cancellation is a property of the adopted model, not of photon-energy-resolved resonant-Auger spectroscopy generally. Under the reference count and resolution assumptions, XAS alone yields a Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) corresponding to a 1.20% local fractional standard uncertainty in the excitation-weighted total natural width; adding Auger reduces this uncertainty by only 0.70%. In contrast, the uncertainty in the spectator-$pp$ branching fraction falls by 99.19%, with similarly large gains for partial-rate scales. A generalized Fisher comparison gives a 123.5-fold improvement on the standard-deviation scale along the most enhanced information mode. Thus, the principal benefit of the complementary Auger observable is to resolve a nearly degenerate decay-channel decomposition rather than substantially refine the total natural width.