arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.26115

Dunnett's and Tukey's procedures under mixed model covariance structures: dimensional reduction of multivariate-t integrals

Abstract

Dunnett's test compares several treatments with one control, and Tukey's test compares every pair for independent samples with a common variance. We investigate which designs and covariances for a linear mixed model remain on the ordinary Dunnett and Tukey integrals, and in which direction the constants move when the correlation changes. It is shown that for Dunnett's procedure AR(1), the Toeplitz band, alternating ante-dependence, and the random slope have roots below the ordinary analysis-of-variance value, while heterogeneous compound symmetry and heteroscedastic groups have roots above that value. For Tukey's procedure every computed non-spherical covariance lowers the root. The second goal is the dimensional reduction of these multivariate-t integrals: a normal probability mixed over one chi-square scale. Conditioning on the latent variables shared by the contrasts replaces that probability by a product of univariate normals, and the integral has the dimension of the conditioning vector plus one. Balanced compound symmetry leaves a double integral. The studentized range reduces to the Pearson-Hartley integral. The reduction stops for asymmetric overlap of four or more treatments, for four or more autoregressive or unstructured follow-up times, for pair-dependent variances or correlated disjoint pairs, and for a separate variance estimate in each group.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dmytro Ivanchenko, Rostyslav Yamnenko. 2026-10-19. Dunnett's and Tukey's procedures under mixed model covariance structures: dimensional reduction of multivariate-t integrals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26115

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Axioms for validity: e-values, p-values and data-dependent levels

The emerging literature on hypothesis testing with data-dependent significance levels relies on a particular extension of the Type-I error. Existing arguments for this extension are heuristic. We show it is uniquely characterized by three axioms: law-invariance, agreement with classical testing on constant levels, and the preservation of (in)validity under independent selection of the level. We find that three analogous axioms characterize the e-value as a multi-decision generalization of a test in a decision-theoretic framework. We recover the p-value by dropping the invalidity half of the independent selection axiom, showing that e-values correspond to those p-values for which a data-independent choice between two invalid p-values cannot produce a valid p-value. Our main technical contribution is to show how e-values emerge in every decision problem with a notion of validity that satisfies law invariance, the independent selection axiom, and an axiom stating that a procedure that selects an invalid procedure with arbitrarily high probability must itself be invalid. In an application to post-hoc decision-making, we justify expectation-based error rates in multiple testing and recover the 'e-closure principle' as a special case.

math.ST↗

Optimal Community Recovery by Spectrally Initialized Variational EM in General Stochastic Block Models

We prove a Chernoff-exponent guarantee for the output of spectrally initialized batch variational EM after a prescribed iteration budget, without assuming global maximization of its variational objective. The iteration repeatedly estimates the entire block probability matrix and community proportions from the same sparse graph. We consider a fixed number of communities with proportions bounded away from zero and fixed, positive, distinct connectivity profiles; neither assortativity nor full rank is required. The algorithm uses simultaneous softmax updates without sample splitting or posterior thresholding. Its analysis must control the feedback between estimated parameters, soft labels and reused edges at an exponentially small risk scale. We establish a uniform one-step bound over data-dependent soft assignments whose random remainder has exponentially small expectation. Combined with an exponentially reliable regularized spectral initializer, this yields an unconditional expected misclassification rate bounded by $\exp\{-(1-o(1))J_n\}$ throughout the sparse, diverging-degree regime, where $J_n$ is the minimum nodewise Chernoff information. Matching lower bounds establish first-order logarithmic minimax optimality on local parameter spaces allowing unknown connectivity and varying community counts. The algorithm also attains the sharp first-order exact-recovery threshold. Numerical experiments illustrate refinement gains and sensitivity to initialization and imbalance.

math.ST↗

Optimal Priors for Betting Tests with Bounded Payoffs: An Exact Efficiency Characterization

Testing by betting is a powerful framework that recasts hypothesis testing as a betting game. A popular approach uses an $F$-weighted portfolio with a predefined prior $F$. For suitable priors, this approach has recently been shown to achieve the optimal expected rejection time as the error probability goes to zero at a fixed alternative. Yet, the prior $F$ changes how the portfolio test behaves near the null. This motivates the question: Which prior should we use in testing-by-betting algorithms? We study bounded scalar payoffs and introduce an efficiency measure that allows the error probability and alternative to vary jointly. Under mild assumptions, we prove that efficiency equals a logarithmic decay index of the prior near zero. This gives a necessary and sufficient condition for optimality: Beta priors have infinite efficiency, whereas suitable Robbins-type priors attain efficiency 1. As an application, we consider testing a specified mean of a bounded random variable and describe an implementation of the portfolio algorithm with almost-linear computational complexity.

math.ST↗