arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.26095

How Robust Are Prognostic Radiomic Features? Comparing Selection Techniques on Pooled Glioblastoma Cohorts

Yannick Sodonougbo·Marlene Schnieders·Alexia Rizoudis·Santiago Cepeda·Frank Kramer·Dominik Müller
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Radiomic survival studies in glioblastoma report heterogeneous prognostic features, but how much of this stems from the methodology itself is rarely examined. We analysed the association of 463 radiomic, anatomical and clinical features from pre-treatment MRI with overall survival in 705 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients from three public cohorts, using three techniques: a log-rank test after median split, univariate Cox regression (both Benjamini-Hochberg corrected) and an XGBoost regressor interpreted with SHAP. The log-rank test selected 99 features, Cox regression 72 and SHAP its top 20; five were selected by all three: age, a peritumoural T2 texture feature, the number of connected peritumoural mask components and two image-level intensity maxima. The two survival tests shared 51 features, about half of the SHAP top 20 were also selected by either test, and where selections overlapped, effect directions agreed. Many selections were PyRadiomics diagnostic descriptors that are not restricted to tumour voxels. Analytical pipeline choices, including ranking method, pre-filtering and descriptor handling, can substantially influence which features appear prognostic.

Explore related subjects

cs.CVcs.AIq-bio.QM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yannick Sodonougbo, Marlene Schnieders, Alexia Rizoudis, Santiago Cepeda, Frank Kramer, Dominik Müller. 2026-10-19. How Robust Are Prognostic Radiomic Features? Comparing Selection Techniques on Pooled Glioblastoma Cohorts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26095

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

CMFDFormer: Transformer-based Copy-Move Forgery Detection with Continual Learning

Copy-move forgery detection aims at detecting duplicated regions in a suspected forged image, and deep learning based copy-move forgery detection methods are in the ascendant. These deep learning based methods heavily rely on synthetic training data, and the performance will degrade when facing new tasks. In this paper, we propose a Transformer-style copy-move forgery detection network named as CMFDFormer, and provide a novel PCSD (Pooled Cube and Strip Distillation) continual learning framework to help CMFDFormer handle new tasks. CMFDFormer consists of a MiT (Mix Transformer) backbone network and a PHD (Pluggable Hybrid Decoder) mask prediction network. The MiT backbone network is a Transformer-style network which is adopted on the basis of comprehensive analyses with CNN-style and MLP-style backbones. The PHD network is constructed based on self-correlation computation, hierarchical feature integration, a multi-scale cycle fully-connected block and a mask reconstruction block. The PHD network is applicable to feature extractors of different styles for hierarchical multi-scale information extraction, achieving comparable performance. Last but not least, we propose a PCSD continual learning framework to improve the forgery detectability and avoid catastrophic forgetting when handling new tasks. Our continual learning framework restricts intermediate features from the PHD network, and takes advantage of both cube pooling and strip pooling. Extensive experiments on publicly available datasets demonstrate the good performance of CMFDFormer and the effectiveness of the PCSD continual learning framework.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

PDB: Not All Drivers Are the Same -- A Personalized Dataset for Understanding Driving Behavior

Driving behavior varies across individuals, yet most existing driving datasets do not preserve driver identity or control for factors that may affect driving style. We introduce the Personalized Driving Behavior (PDB) dataset, a multimodal dataset collected from 9 drivers using the same vehicle and route under comparable conditions. PDB includes data from a 128-line LiDAR, external and driver-facing cameras, GNSS, IMU, CAN-bus signals, and heart-rate measurements, with 111,060 frames of LiDAR point cloud data and more than 1.33 million images. Based on these recordings, we construct PDB-Traj, a personalized trajectory prediction benchmark with 1,309 10-second trajectory segments sampled at 10 Hz. Each segment includes the ego trajectory, surrounding-agent trajectories, and driver identity. We further introduce Gated Selective Personalization (Gate-SP), a driver-aware baseline that selectively incorporates driver identity into trajectory prediction. Experiments on PDB-Traj provide reference results for personalized motion forecasting and show that driver information can improve prediction when applied selectively. PDB and PDB-Traj provide a benchmark for studying driver-specific behavior and personalized trajectory prediction.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

TestDG: Test-time Domain Generalization for Continual Test-time Adaptation

This paper studies continual test-time adaptation (CTTA), the task of adapting a model to constantly changing unseen domains in testing while preserving previously learned knowledge. Existing CTTA methods mostly focus on adaptation to the current test domain only, overlooking generalization to arbitrary test domains a model may face in the future. To tackle this limitation, we present a novel online test-time domain generalization framework for CTTA, dubbed TestDG. TestDG aims to learn features invariant to both current and previous test domains on the fly during testing, improving the potential for effective generalization to future domains. To this end, we propose a new model architecture and a test-time adaptation strategy dedicated to learning domain-invariant features, along with prototype selection and update mechanisms for effectively managing information from previous test domains. TestDG achieved state of the art on three of four public CTTA benchmarks and performed on par with the best prior method on ImageNet-C. Moreover, it showed superior generalization to unseen test domains.

cs.CV↗