arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.25870

Where to weight? Estimating population causal effects with weighted double score matching in complex surveys

Yukang Zeng·Guangyu Tong·Jiaqi Tong·Haidong Lu·Bhramar Mukherjee·Fan Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Double score matching is an emerging method for causal inference that combines propensity and prognostic scores to achieve dimension reduction and model robustness. However, when the observational data are drawn from a complex survey, the existing literature does not provide sufficient guidance on the proper use of survey weights in matching strategies for population-level causal inference. We develop weighted double score matching (WDSM) that provides a unified framework for incorporating survey weights throughout the score estimation, matching, and outcome analysis under both retrospective (informative) and prospective (non-informative) sampling designs. We establish asymptotic normality of the resultant effect estimates under both known and estimated scores and develop a linearization-based bootstrap procedure for variance estimation that preserves the survey-weighted matching structure. Simulation studies show that WDSM substantially reduces bias relative to unweighted matching when either the propensity score model or the prognostic score models are correctly specified. Under correct specification, WDSM also improves efficiency and confidence interval coverage relative to survey-weighted propensity score matching, with particularly pronounced gains under poor overlap. Applications to early marijuana use and mental health in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and to sleep duration and glycemic control in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey illustrate the practical value of WDSM for population-level inference. We conclude with a discussion of our findings and provide practical guidance on incorporating survey weights into matching-based analyses of observational data.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yukang Zeng, Guangyu Tong, Jiaqi Tong, Haidong Lu, Bhramar Mukherjee, Fan Li. 2026-10-19. Where to weight? Estimating population causal effects with weighted double score matching in complex surveys. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25870

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Estimating treatment effects with a unified semi-parametric difference-in-differences approach

Difference-in-differences (DID) approaches estimate causal effects with observational data before and after an intervention. DID traditionally estimates the average treatment effect among the treated and assumes parallel trends in outcome means. With skewed outcomes, a transformation is often needed to compare means; however, transformations may be difficult to choose and results may be sensitive to the choice and must be interpreted on the transformed scale. Recent DID methods estimate alternative treatment effects that offer additional insights. However, each estimator requires a different parallel trends assumption. We introduce a new DID method that estimates average, quantile, probability, and novel Mann-Whitney treatment effects among the treated with a single unifying parallel trends assumption. The method uses a semi-parametric cumulative probability model (CPM): a linear model for a latent variable on covariates, where the latent variable results from an unspecified transformation of the outcome. Our approach makes a single parallel trends assumption on the expectation of the latent variable conditional on covariates. Hence, we avoid specifying outcome transformations and separate estimand-specific assumptions. We introduce the method; describe identification, estimation, and inference; conduct simulations evaluating its performance; and apply it to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion on CD4 count among people with HIV.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

A Stable Lasso

The Lasso has been widely used as a method for variable selection, valued for its simplicity and empirical performance. However, Lasso's selection stability deteriorates in the presence of correlated predictors. Several approaches have been developed to mitigate this limitation. In this paper, we provide a brief review of existing approaches, highlighting their limitations. We then propose a technique to improve the selection stability of Lasso by integrating a weighting scheme into the Lasso penalty function, where the weights are defined as an increasing function of a correlation-adjusted ranking that reflects the predictive power of predictors. Empirical evaluations on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method. Additional numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in stabilizing other regularization-based selection methods, indicating its potential as a general-purpose solution.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Copula-Based Time Series for Non-Gaussian and Non-Markovian Stationary Processes

In the copula-based approach to univariate time series modeling, the finite-dimensional temporal dependence of a stationary time series is captured by a copula. Recent studies investigate how copula-based time series models can be generalized to have long-term autoregressive effects. We study a generalization that comes from a Markov sequence of order p and a q-dependent sequence. We derive the relation of the model to Gaussian-ARMA models and to the Gaussian-GARCH(1,1) model. We investigate distributional properties of the process and discuss the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Additionally we analyze the copula moving aggregate process of order one, or MAG(1), as it is a basic building block. Last, we assess the model in a probabilistic forecasting study on a data series for German wind power production.

stat.ME↗