arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.25803

Image CL-SEC: Cross-Layer Semantic Error Correction for Image Communication

Feifan Zhang·Xuelin Bai·Yirun Wang·Yuyang Du·Soung Chang Liew
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Semantic error correction (SEC) uses the semantic knowledge of pretrained models to complement conventional channel decoding. By combining physical-layer decoding information with application-layer semantic predictions, cross-layer SEC (CL-SEC) has demonstrated substantial performance gains in text transmission; however, its applicability to image transmission remains largely unexplored. This paper proposes Image CL-SEC, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first extension of the CL-SEC framework to image transmission. Image CL-SEC uses channel-decoding information together with contextual predictions from a pretrained visual model to resolve residual uncertainty after forward error correction (FEC) decoding. In our implementation, images are represented as discrete visual tokens. For each token position selected for re-evaluation, the probability distribution produced by the channel decoder is combined with the distribution predicted by the visual model to identify the most likely transmitted token. The resulting decision therefore reflects both channel evidence and visual context. Experiments across multiple channel conditions show that, at low and moderate signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), Image CL-SEC improves pixel-level fidelity, perceptual similarity, and token-recovery accuracy relative to either channel decoding or visual-model inference alone. Supplementary experiments using different pretrained visual models further demonstrate that these gains are not specific to a single model.

Explore related subjects

eess.IV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Feifan Zhang, Xuelin Bai, Yirun Wang, Yuyang Du, Soung Chang Liew. 2026-10-19. Image CL-SEC: Cross-Layer Semantic Error Correction for Image Communication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25803

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

ForcingDAS: Unified and Robust Data Assimilation via Diffusion Forcing

Data assimilation (DA) estimates the state of an evolving dynamical system from noisy, partial observations, and is widely used in scientific simulation as well as weather and climate science. In practice, filtering methods rely on frame-to-frame transition models. However, these models are fragile when observations are non-Markovian (when they form only a partial slice of a higher-dimensional latent state as in real-world weather data): they tend to accumulate errors over long horizons. At the same time, learned DA methods typically commit to a single regime, either filtering (nowcasting, real-time forecasting) or smoothing (retrospective reanalysis), which splits what should be a shared prior across application-specific pipelines. To address both issues, we introduce ForcingDAS, a unified and robust DA framework. Built on Diffusion Forcing with an independent noise level assigned to each frame, ForcingDAS learns a joint-trajectory prior instead of frame-to-frame transitions. This allows it to capture long-horizon temporal dependencies and reduce error accumulation. In addition, the same trained model spans the full filtering to smoothing spectrum at inference time. Specifically, nowcasting, fixed-lag smoothing, and batch reanalysis are selected through the inference schedule alone, without retraining. We evaluate ForcingDAS on 2D Navier-Stokes vorticity, precipitation nowcasting, and global atmospheric state estimation. Across all settings, a single model is competitive with or outperforms both learned and classical baselines that are specialized for individual regimes, with the largest gains observed on real-world weather benchmarks.

eess.IV↗
arXiv2026

Uncertainty-Gated SHAP-Dirichlet Refinement for MRI-Based Depression Classification

Structural MRI-based classification of major depressive disorder (MDD) remains challenging due to subtle, heterogeneous anatomical changes. We propose uncertainty-gated SHAP-Dirichlet refinement, a post-hoc reliability layer that improves predictions without retraining the classifier. The method retrieves similar labeled SHAP explanations, constructs Dirichlet class evidence, and selectively refines uncertain predictions through probabilistic fusion, while allowing unreliable cases to be deferred for expert review. We evaluate five classifiers on 504 SRPBS subjects (252 controls and 252 MDD patients) using 159 anatomical features and repeated nested cross-validation. Refinement improved accuracy across all 8 repetitions for TabM and ResNet, yielding mean gains of 1.04 and 0.45 percentage points (sign test p=0.008), while modifying at most 8.3% of predictions. Gains were concentrated among low-confidence cases, with significant improvements in calibration. The method also benefited an RBF support vector machine but not logistic regression or random forests. Ablations confirmed the importance of uncertainty gating and soft fusion. Dirichlet evidence identified baseline errors (AUROC 0.62), while deferring 50% of cases increased retained-case accuracy to approximately 75%. These findings support selective explanation-guided refinement as a practical approach to improving prediction reliability and facilitating expert triage in MDD classification.

eess.IV↗
arXiv2026

Localization Gains from Explanation Regularization Should Not Be Interpreted as Faithfulness Gains.

Training-time explanation regularization is often evaluated by whether saliency maps become more concentrated within annotated regions. We argue that this criterion alone is insufficient: transformation consistency, lesion localization, and faithfulness to the classifier are distinct properties and should be evaluated separately, particularly in medical imaging. We examine this distinction through a case study of Contrastive Grad-CAM Consistency (CGC) in three-class brain tumor MRI classification. Using a single-channel ResNet-50 with five-fold patient-grouped cross-validation, we compare a cross-entropy baseline with CGC. CGC changes overall Pointing Game (PG) from $27.24\%$ to $36.02\%$ and Relevance Mass Accuracy (RMA) from $11.17\%$ to $18.01\%$, while classification accuracy changes from $93.63\%$ to $94.87\%$. Perturbation-based faithfulness metrics show inconsistent changes: Insertion Area Under the Curve (IAUC) changes from $0.73$ to $0.78$, whereas Deletion Area Under the Curve (DAUC) favors the baseline ($0.36$ versus $0.41$; lower is better), and overall Iterative Removal Of Features (IROF) is $0.57$ for both models. These results support our position that improved spatial agreement with pathology should not be interpreted as a general improvement in explanation faithfulness. We therefore recommend property-specific evaluation in which the property targeted by the explanation objective, spatial agreement with reference regions, and model reliance are measured and reported separately.

eess.IV↗