arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.25788

Can LLM User-Proxies Stand In for Humans in Reliance Measurement? Replicating Rel-A.I. with Simulated Users

Shuai Wang·Rui Hu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Can language-model user proxies reproduce human reliance on an AI answer across contexts? Published simulated-user studies do not establish validity for this partial-answer decision, and Rel-A.I.'s released human record omits trial-level choices. We audit its 90 printed questions and 15 domain-by-marker reliance rates using sampled decisions and counterbalanced A/B probabilities from open models through 72B parameters. A matched crossover varies the printed agent specialty within each question, separating question content, label averages, and their interaction. Mistral Small's strong-marker math-minus-law label marginal is -0.4 percentage points, yet matching the agent label to the question domain raises reliance by 13.3 points on average across the five domains. The best A/B proxy has 22.5-point absolute-rate error and 8.3-point domain-effect error against the human table. A two-sample independent-binomial human replication has 3.5-point expected domain-effect error under the stated working model. The interaction is model dependent, and inference layout changes identical-prompt probabilities. This single-study audit does not establish proxy validity for human effect sizes or general directional screening.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shuai Wang, Rui Hu. 2026-10-19. Can LLM User-Proxies Stand In for Humans in Reliance Measurement? Replicating Rel-A.I. with Simulated Users. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25788

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Agent-OM: Leveraging LLM Agents for Ontology Matching

Ontology matching (OM) enables semantic interoperability between different ontologies and resolves their conceptual heterogeneity by aligning related entities. OM systems currently have two prevailing design paradigms: conventional knowledge-based expert systems and newer machine learning-based predictive systems. While large language models (LLMs) and LLM agents have revolutionised data engineering and have been applied creatively in many domains, their potential for OM remains underexplored. This study introduces a novel agent-powered LLM-based design paradigm for OM systems. With consideration of several specific challenges in leveraging LLM agents for OM, we propose a generic framework, namely Agent-OM (Agent for Ontology Matching), consisting of two Siamese agents for retrieval and matching, with a set of OM tools. Our framework is implemented in a proof-of-concept system. Evaluations of three Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) tracks over state-of-the-art OM systems show that our system can achieve results very close to the long-standing best performance on simple OM tasks and can significantly improve the performance on complex and few-shot OM tasks.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

OM4OV: Leveraging Ontology Matching for Ontology Versioning

Due to the dynamics of the Semantic Web, version control is necessary to manage changes in widely used ontologies. Despite the long-standing recognition of ontology versioning (OV) as a crucial component of efficient ontology management, many approaches treat OV as similar to ontology matching (OM) and directly reuse OM systems for OV tasks. In this study, we systematically analyse similarities and differences between OM and OV and formalise an OM4OV framework to offer more advanced OV support. The framework is implemented and evaluated in the state-of-the-art OM system Agent-OM. The experimental results indicate that OM systems can be effectively reused for OV tasks, but without the necessary extensions, can produce skewed measurements, poor performance in detecting update entities, and limited explanations of false mappings. To tackle these issues, we propose an optimisation method called the cross-reference (CR) mechanism, which builds on existing OM alignments to reduce the number of matching candidates and to improve overall OV performance.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

SELECT: Semantic Erasure Boundary Construction with Sibling Exclusive Counterfactuals

Concept erasure aims to suppress undesirable concepts in text-to-image diffusion models while preserving their generative capabilities. Existing methods often redirect target concepts toward predefined semantic anchors, but the influence of anchor selection on the scope of concept erasure remains insufficiently understood. Through causal tracing, we reveal that concepts with more dispersed causal effects tend to exhibit higher anchor sensitivity and lower erasure robustness. Controlled anchor interventions demonstrate that anchor selection affects target suppression and collateral damage to surrounding semantic concepts. These findings motivate us to formulate anchor selection as semantic erasure boundary construction. We propose SELECT (Selective Erasure via Local Exclusive Counterfactual Targets), a plug-and-play framework based on Sibling Exclusive Concepts (SECs), which are semantically close to the target but mutually exclusive in its defining attributes. SELECT jointly constructs a counterfactual redirection endpoint and a local retention set to balance target suppression and semantic preservation. SELECT filters candidates using contextual activation, and uses semantic coherence to identify context compatible redirection endpoints, while the remaining SECs serve as local preservation constraints. Experiments on object, celebrity, artist-style, and NSFW erasure show that SELECT strengthens target suppression over fixed general anchors and achieves suppression-preservation trade-offs, while reducing concept re-emergence and erosion.

cs.AI↗