arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.25739

How Much Does One Wrong Answer Cost? Error Propagation in Constraint Pruning with Noisy LLM Oracles

Abstract

Constraint pruning saves queries to a large language model (LLM) or another noisy oracle by skipping each yes/no question implied by answers accepted earlier, for example through transitivity. Entity-resolution systems and LLM-based rankers use this idea. However, their analyses typically assume a correct oracle. We argue that pruning should be judged by its risk when the oracle errs, since an accepted wrong answer spreads to every question it implies. When each answer is wrong independently with small probability $\varepsilon$, the first-order risk is set by how many facts one wrong answer corrupts on average. We consider two kinds of constraints. For implication rules, as in taxonomies, pruning in a random order adds no first-order risk: a wrong answer that would change $k$ facts is accepted with probability $1/k$, so it costs one fact on average. Rules with $s$ premises break this balance: a wrong answer at a premise shared by $r$ rules can cost order $r^{1-1/s}$ facts. For entity resolution with $m$ records of one entity, the first-order risk equals $\varepsilon$ times the Wiener index (the total pairwise distance) of the spanning tree built by the query order. Pivot orders, which first compare one record with all others, amplify errors by less than 2 and are optimal; random orders by order $m^{1/3}$; the common most-similar-first order is the worst in one dimension and, for large $m$, worse than random in two. With several entities, the cost of wrongly merging two does not depend on how many others exist. Simulations agree with every predicted constant within sampling error.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhengtao Gui, Weining Shen. 2026-10-19. How Much Does One Wrong Answer Cost? Error Propagation in Constraint Pruning with Noisy LLM Oracles. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25739

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Heterogeneous Sheaf Neural Networks

Heterogeneous graphs, whose nodes and edges can belong to different types and feature spaces, arise in many real-world domains, including biology, recommendation, social networks, and computer systems. Existing heterogeneous graph neural networks typically handle this heterogeneity at the architectural level through relation-specific modules, meta-path machinery or type-aware attention, which often leads to increasingly specialised parameter-heavy designs. In this work, we propose HetSheaf, a framework for learning heterogeneous graphs through cellular sheaves. Instead of encoding heterogeneity solely in the architecture, HetSheaf represents it directly in the underlying data structure by assigning type-aware local feature spaces and learning restriction maps conditioned on node features, node types, and edge types. To support graph-level prediction, we further introduce SheafPool, a universal stalk-space readout that aggregates node representations while being invariant to local changes of basis, thereby making graph classification with sheaf networks well-defined and achieving an F1 Score up to 42 percentage points higher than mean pooling. Across a diverse suite of benchmarks (node classification, link prediction and graph classification). HetSheaf consistently achieves up to 2 percentage points higher performance (up to 94.97% Macro F1 Score on node classification and up to 99.62% on link prediction) on the Heterogeneous Graph Benchmark (HGB) framework against homogeneous (GCN, GAT, GIN, GraphSAGE), heterogeneous (R-GCN, HAT, HGT) and type-agnostic sheaf baselines, while reducing the number of parameters by up to 10$\times$.

cs.LG↗

Risk-averse learning with delayed feedback

In real-world scenarios, risk-averse learning is valuable for mitigating potential adverse outcomes. However, the delayed feedback makes it challenging to assess and manage risk effectively. In this paper, we investigate risk-averse learning using Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) as risk measure, while incorporating feedback with random but bounded delays. We develop two risk-averse learning algorithms that rely on one-point and two-point zeroth-order optimization approaches, respectively. The dynamic regrets of the algorithms are analyzed in terms of the cumulative delay and the number of total samplings. In the absence of delay, the regret bounds match the established bounds of zeroth-order stochastic gradient methods for risk-averse learning. Furthermore, the two-point risk-averse learning outperforms the one-point algorithm by achieving a smaller regret bound. We provide numerical experiments on a dynamic pricing problem to demonstrate the performance of the algorithms.

cs.LG↗

On the Value of Cross-Modal Misalignment in Multimodal Representation Learning

Multimodal representation learning, exemplified by multimodal contrastive learning (MMCL) using image-text pairs, aims to learn powerful representations by aligning cues across modalities. This approach relies on the core assumption that the exemplar image-text pairs constitute two representations of an identical concept. However, recent research has revealed that real-world datasets often exhibit \emph{cross-modal misalignment}. There are two distinct viewpoints on how to address this issue: one suggests mitigating the misalignment, and the other leveraging it. We seek here to reconcile these seemingly opposing perspectives and to provide a practical guide for practitioners. Using latent variable models, we thus formalize cross-modal misalignment by introducing two specific mechanisms: \emph{selection bias}, where some semantic variables are absent in the text, and \emph{perturbation bias}, where semantic variables are altered---both leading to misalignment in data pairs. Our theoretical analysis shows that, under suitable assumptions, population global minimizers of an alignment--entropy surrogate yield representations that depend only on the semantic variables unaffected by selection and perturbation biases and locally identify this subset almost surely. Extensive empirical studies on synthetic data and real image-text datasets further examine how cross-modal misalignment shapes semantic predictability and downstream performance, shedding light on its nuanced impact on multimodal representation learning.

cs.LG↗