arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.25405

DR-Learners for Generalizing CATEs from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials are essential for evaluating interventions, yet average treatment effects can obscure treatment effect heterogeneity, making conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) a natural target. However, restrictive eligibility criteria and differential trial participation can limit the generalizability of these effects to broader target populations. Building on existing DR-Learners, we develop the gDR-Learner for generalizing RCT CATEs to a target population, using cross-fitted machine-learning nuisance estimation. We derive excess-risk bounds in which nuisance errors enter only as products, showing that the estimator achieves oracle-rate convergence despite slower individual nuisance estimation. The variables needed to generalize are rarely measured across the entire target population. We therefore extend the methods to two settings with incomplete covariate information: when certain covariates are measured only in the trial (e.g., biomarkers), and covariates driving trial participation measured only in a subsample of the target population, such as a representative cohort or registry. We construct weighted conformal prediction intervals for individual treatment effects, accounting for covariate shift between the trial and target population. In simulations, the gDR-Learner achieved the lowest estimation error when all covariates were observed relative to standard T- and DR-Learners and an inverse-probability-weighted T-Learner, and also outperformed the latter under incomplete covariate observation. We illustrate the methods by reanalyzing the Coronary Artery Surgery Study, examining treatment effect heterogeneity by prior myocardial infarction and baseline ejection fraction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vanessa Rodriguez, Brieuc Lehmann, Karla Diaz-Ordaz. 2026-10-18. DR-Learners for Generalizing CATEs from a Randomized Controlled Trial. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25405

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Estimating treatment effects with a unified semi-parametric difference-in-differences approach

Difference-in-differences (DID) approaches estimate causal effects with observational data before and after an intervention. DID traditionally estimates the average treatment effect among the treated and assumes parallel trends in outcome means. With skewed outcomes, a transformation is often needed to compare means; however, transformations may be difficult to choose and results may be sensitive to the choice and must be interpreted on the transformed scale. Recent DID methods estimate alternative treatment effects that offer additional insights. However, each estimator requires a different parallel trends assumption. We introduce a new DID method that estimates average, quantile, probability, and novel Mann-Whitney treatment effects among the treated with a single unifying parallel trends assumption. The method uses a semi-parametric cumulative probability model (CPM): a linear model for a latent variable on covariates, where the latent variable results from an unspecified transformation of the outcome. Our approach makes a single parallel trends assumption on the expectation of the latent variable conditional on covariates. Hence, we avoid specifying outcome transformations and separate estimand-specific assumptions. We introduce the method; describe identification, estimation, and inference; conduct simulations evaluating its performance; and apply it to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion on CD4 count among people with HIV.

stat.ME↗

A Stable Lasso

The Lasso has been widely used as a method for variable selection, valued for its simplicity and empirical performance. However, Lasso's selection stability deteriorates in the presence of correlated predictors. Several approaches have been developed to mitigate this limitation. In this paper, we provide a brief review of existing approaches, highlighting their limitations. We then propose a technique to improve the selection stability of Lasso by integrating a weighting scheme into the Lasso penalty function, where the weights are defined as an increasing function of a correlation-adjusted ranking that reflects the predictive power of predictors. Empirical evaluations on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method. Additional numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in stabilizing other regularization-based selection methods, indicating its potential as a general-purpose solution.

stat.ME↗

Copula-Based Time Series for Non-Gaussian and Non-Markovian Stationary Processes

In the copula-based approach to univariate time series modeling, the finite-dimensional temporal dependence of a stationary time series is captured by a copula. Recent studies investigate how copula-based time series models can be generalized to have long-term autoregressive effects. We study a generalization that comes from a Markov sequence of order p and a q-dependent sequence. We derive the relation of the model to Gaussian-ARMA models and to the Gaussian-GARCH(1,1) model. We investigate distributional properties of the process and discuss the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Additionally we analyze the copula moving aggregate process of order one, or MAG(1), as it is a basic building block. Last, we assess the model in a probabilistic forecasting study on a data series for German wind power production.

stat.ME↗