arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.25371

Whistle and Wrong Lyrics: Synthetic Queries Are Not Enough for Real-World Query-by-Melody

Abstract

People look up a song by humming it, but also by whistling it or singing it with the wrong words. Published query-by-humming systems and benchmarks focus on hums and sung queries, and no public dataset pairs whistles or wrong-lyrics singing with song recordings. We study both query types with a melody-only retrieval system: a key-normalized pitch track embedded by a 5.2M-parameter contour encoder, with a spectral-peak tracker for whistles. First, a physics-grounded generator renders synthetic whistles and nonsense-syllable singing from the vocal melodies of 11,083 songs. Training on them raises top-1 retrieval of held-out synthetic queries against an 11,050-song gallery from 0.180 to 0.251 for whistles and from 0.193 to 0.264 for wrong-lyrics singing, but the gain does not transfer: on the MLEnd test performers the best synthetic-only model gets 210 of 339 real whistles right at top-1, against 214 for the baseline. Second, a closed-set fine-tune on real MLEnd whistles with performer-disjoint splits raises whistle-to-hum top-1 from 0.631 (95% CI 0.581-0.681) to 0.673 (0.622-0.723), on known songs only. Third, two further generations of synthetic queries also fail to transfer: melody-conditioned whistles and la-la singing from a commercial neural music model leave real-whistle top-1 at 0.631, and an open-source pipeline (YingMusic-Singer-Plus singing with partly wrong, mumbled or nonsense lyrics, a DDSP whistle synthesizer, and a melody-error model fitted on real performers) gives at best 0.619 (paired difference -0.012, 95% CI -0.038 to +0.015). Across physics-based, commercial neural and open-source neural synthetic data, nothing transferred to real whistles, which points to collecting real queries as the missing step. Code is public; models and data will be released.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luigi Rivolta. 2026-10-18. Whistle and Wrong Lyrics: Synthetic Queries Are Not Enough for Real-World Query-by-Melody. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25371

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Manifold-Constrained Residual Adaptation with Frame-Adaptive Layer Aggregation for Speaker Verification

Large self-supervised speech models provide powerful representations for speaker verification, but full fine-tuning is expensive. Most conventional adapters insert small trainable modules to modify the output of each layer, while keeping the original residual connections unchanged. Building on our preliminary study of manifold-constrained Hyper-Connections in speaker encoders, we explore parameter-efficient adaptation of both residual paths and feature selection across layers. We first propose a Manifold-Constrained Residual Adapter (MCRA), which splits the hidden dimensions of each Transformer residual state into N groups and uses a small Sinkhorn-normalized matrix to exchange information among them. A learnable gate controls the balance between the original and mixed residual paths. The gate adds only one scalar parameter at each residual connection and initially favors the original path, allowing gradual adaptation. We further propose Frame-Adaptive Layer Aggregation (FALA), an attention-based aggregation method that uses a single learned query shared across all utterances to compute layer weights separately for each speech frame. Because the layer representations depend on the input, the resulting weights vary across both utterances and frames, unlike the fixed weights of a conventional layer-weighted sum. Compared with a frozen WavLM baseline using a fixed layer-weighted sum, our method achieves relative EER reductions of 22.4% on VoxCeleb1-O and 2.9% on CN-Celeb, with trainable adaptation parameters equivalent to only 0.0009% and 0.0016% of the WavLM-Large parameters, respectively.

cs.SD↗

Structural Context from Audio and Lyric Evidence for Music Structure Analysis Using the New SheetSage-MSA Dataset

Music structure analysis (MSA) aims to identify functional labels and their boundaries in music. Despite recent progress, three challenges remain. First, fine-grained annotations for MSA are scarce. Second, existing systems often share one encoder between boundary detection and functional labeling despite their different information requirements. Third, most end-to-end systems are audio-only and ignore structural cues from lyrics. To address these issues, we construct SheetSage-MSA, an MSA dataset derived from SheetSage, containing 13,880 cleaned excerpt annotations from 9,010 songs and approximately 82.5 hours of annotated audio. We further propose SCALE (Structural Context from Audio and Lyric Evidence), which uses separate task-specific audio pathways to model local transitions and long-range structural context, and incorporates timestamped lyrics and lyrical recurrence to refine chorus predictions. On the HarmonixSet benchmark, SCALE outperforms the existing state-of-the-art SongFormer by 3.5 and 4.2 percentage points in HR.5F and HR3F, respectively, while improving ACC by 0.9 points. An interactive demo page containing the source code is also available at https://multimodal-music-research-lab.github.io/SCALE/.

cs.SD↗

AudioScorer: Learning Question-Aware Token Relevance for Large Audio Language Models

Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) reason over speech, environmental sounds, music, and other acoustic information. However, their audio encoders produce dense token sequences that make long-form audio costly to process. Existing audio pruning methods reduce this cost using heuristics such as attention, representation similarity, or temporal sampling, but do not explicitly learn which tokens are most useful for a given question. We propose AudioScorer, a lightweight model that scores audio tokens according to the user question. It is trained by distilling the ranking of audio tokens under the frozen LALM's answer-gradient saliency, together with downstream answer supervision. Compared with other pruning methods, AudioScorer achieves the best or tied-best result at 10% token retention on 7 of 10 semantic and acoustic tasks, including speech recognition, emotion recognition, and audio-scene classification.

cs.SD↗