DAGLoop: Aligning Method Design with Experimental Feedback in Automated AI Research

Abstract

Automated AI research agents aim to improve machine learning methods by iteratively proposing, implementing, and evaluating candidate methods. Existing work uses the outcome of each evaluation to determine how the next candidate should be revised for performance improvement. However, a candidate often combines multiple design decisions, and its overall outcome alone does not reveal which decisions produced their expected effects, whether their required conditions were satisfied, or which decisions should be retained or revised. Inspired by ablation studies in the machine learning community, we propose DAGLoop to test the expected effect of a design decision by comparing implementations with and without that decision while preserving the other decisions it requires. Specifically, DAGLoop translates each design decision's rationale into a testable expectation and pairs it with a targeted experiment, forming an experimental specification for assessing the expected effect under its required conditions. Using these specifications, we formulate ablation planning as the construction of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) from the candidate method's design: nodes associate decisions with tests, and edges encode dependencies. The DAG specifies which decisions each experiment must retain and supports joint tests when an expected effect requires several decisions to act together. Outcomes are recorded with the tested decisions, expectations, and conditions to form structured research memory. This memory guides the agent in retaining experimentally supported decisions, revising unsupported ones, and planning further experiments when the evidence is unresolved. Experiments on dozens of research tasks demonstrate substantial performance improvements achieved by DAGLoop across diverse executable research settings. Code and evaluation scripts are available at https://github.com/deng34567/DAGLoop.