Coarse Revenue Guarantee in First Price Auction and Beyond

Linchen Zhang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.24901

Coarse Revenue Guarantee in First Price Auction and Beyond

Linchen Zhang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

I study the coarse revenue guarantee (CRG) of the single-unit first-price auction with common values. The CRG is the minimum expected revenue over all information structures and all Bayes coarse correlated equilibria (BCCE), the equilibrium notion to which no-regret learning leads. Identical play, in which all bidders submit the same bid, attains the worst-case revenue, and this reduction yields a closed-form characterization. The coarse guarantee is positive and increases with the number of bidders $N$. It lies strictly below the revenue guarantee of Bergemann, Brooks and Morris (2017) at every finite $n$, and the gap between the two closes at rate $\log N / N$. I extend the analysis to reserve prices, symmetric and asymmetric priors, other standard auctions, and an unknown value distribution.

Explore related subjects

econ.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Linchen Zhang. 2026-10-17. Coarse Revenue Guarantee in First Price Auction and Beyond. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24901

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Rationally Inattentive Echo Chambers

Rationally inattentive players allocate limited attention capacities to biased primary sources and to other players as secondary sources to acquire information about an uncertain state. The resulting Poisson attention network stochastically transmits information from primary sources to a recipient either directly or indirectly through other players. We give conditions for the rise of echo-chamber equilibria in which players restrict attention to their own-biased primary source and same-type peers. We characterize the peer attention networks within echo chambers and analyze their comparative statics. Our results explain why modern information environments foster echo-chamber formation, how small differences in attention capacities can magnify into large disparities in allocations, and why regulatory interventions such as altering user visibility on social media or mandating exposure to opposing views may entail unintended consequences.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

Trading Frictions in Dynamic Cap-and-Trade Markets

Using 2.8 million EU ETS transactions and compliance records, 2005-2022, we document three facts about the world's largest carbon market: each year, 37% of regulated operators do not trade, and non-trading is persistent. Purchases concentrate in the April surrender month, when returns are systematically high. Operator order flow predicts returns, concentrated among frequent traders. A model with costly market access, limited intermediation, and heterogeneous information rationalizes all three. Because access is endogenous, the frictions interact non-additively, shaping how efficiently the market corrects the externality. Staggering deadlines across four groups lowers the surrender-month premium by 58% without changing the cap.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

Effort without Evidence

I study how paternalistic concern for descendants' success affects learning about the need for costly effort. Each generation can use a demanding method or experiment with a less demanding alternative whose effectiveness is uncertain. Parents who underweight descendants' effort costs undervalue the savings that discovery would provide. On an explicit region of priors and preferences, paternalism removes a materially valuable experiment even though the relevant private record is truthfully transmitted. Relative to an aligned equilibrium attaining the material full-record optimum, the paternalistic equilibrium has greater long-run effort and observed success, lower discounted material welfare, and a less informative terminal public signal. Each sender obtains its preferred full-record continuation, so the comparison survives communication deviations within the same physical environment. I also study concealment as an incentive to experiment. A continuous-effort extension establishes that concealment and finite evidence production can coexist in an infinite-horizon equilibrium. Its welfare gain over babbling is distinct from the loss relative to alignment in the main result.

econ.TH↗