arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.24679

Nesting or resolution? Facility proxies for variance estimation versus confounding adjustment in claims data without facility identifiers

Yuta Nonomiya·Tomoka Matsuura·Ryota Kawai·Andreas Dengel·Koichi Kise·Wakaba Fukushima·Ayumi Shintani
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In claims databases, facility identifiers are often removed during de-identification, leaving only coarse attributes such as bed size. Yet facility information is needed for variance estimation, confounding adjustment and assessment of treatment availability. We examined whether accreditation-gated billing items can build strata standing for hospitals, and how to construct a facility proxy for each use. In 1,730,736 adults undergoing surgery (Medical Data Vision database, Japan, 2019-2023), we built marker-pattern strata from 66 accreditation-gated receipt codes (markers) and evaluated each grouping against a true facility identifier in an insurer-based database (DeSC Healthcare) and in simulation. The variance explained by the marker-pattern strata decreased with the extent to which a variable was patient- rather than hospital-determined ($R^2$ 0.921 for an accreditation item, 0.036 for sex). For variance estimation, the supplied-attribute cells, which can merge but never split hospitals, kept the type I error rate at 4.8% with a wild cluster bootstrap, against 5.4% for the true identifier and 39% when clustering was ignored; every finer marker-based grouping did worse. For adjustment, evaluated with real facility-level confounders and simulated null exposures, the marker pattern removed 51% of the confounding related to accreditation-linked facility characteristics, against 8% for the cells. The proportion of patients in groups mixing hospitals with and without the relevant accreditation was 49% for the marker pattern against 98% for the cells. No single facility proxy serves every purpose: nesting governs variance estimation, and resolution governs adjustment and treatment availability. Without a facility identifier, the supplied-attribute cells can carry the standard errors, and marker-pattern strata are worth considering for the other two uses.

Explore related subjects

stat.MEstat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuta Nonomiya, Tomoka Matsuura, Ryota Kawai, Andreas Dengel, Koichi Kise, Wakaba Fukushima, Ayumi Shintani. 2026-10-17. Nesting or resolution? Facility proxies for variance estimation versus confounding adjustment in claims data without facility identifiers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24679

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Estimating treatment effects with a unified semi-parametric difference-in-differences approach

Difference-in-differences (DID) approaches estimate causal effects with observational data before and after an intervention. DID traditionally estimates the average treatment effect among the treated and assumes parallel trends in outcome means. With skewed outcomes, a transformation is often needed to compare means; however, transformations may be difficult to choose and results may be sensitive to the choice and must be interpreted on the transformed scale. Recent DID methods estimate alternative treatment effects that offer additional insights. However, each estimator requires a different parallel trends assumption. We introduce a new DID method that estimates average, quantile, probability, and novel Mann-Whitney treatment effects among the treated with a single unifying parallel trends assumption. The method uses a semi-parametric cumulative probability model (CPM): a linear model for a latent variable on covariates, where the latent variable results from an unspecified transformation of the outcome. Our approach makes a single parallel trends assumption on the expectation of the latent variable conditional on covariates. Hence, we avoid specifying outcome transformations and separate estimand-specific assumptions. We introduce the method; describe identification, estimation, and inference; conduct simulations evaluating its performance; and apply it to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion on CD4 count among people with HIV.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

A Stable Lasso

The Lasso has been widely used as a method for variable selection, valued for its simplicity and empirical performance. However, Lasso's selection stability deteriorates in the presence of correlated predictors. Several approaches have been developed to mitigate this limitation. In this paper, we provide a brief review of existing approaches, highlighting their limitations. We then propose a technique to improve the selection stability of Lasso by integrating a weighting scheme into the Lasso penalty function, where the weights are defined as an increasing function of a correlation-adjusted ranking that reflects the predictive power of predictors. Empirical evaluations on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method. Additional numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in stabilizing other regularization-based selection methods, indicating its potential as a general-purpose solution.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Copula-Based Time Series for Non-Gaussian and Non-Markovian Stationary Processes

In the copula-based approach to univariate time series modeling, the finite-dimensional temporal dependence of a stationary time series is captured by a copula. Recent studies investigate how copula-based time series models can be generalized to have long-term autoregressive effects. We study a generalization that comes from a Markov sequence of order p and a q-dependent sequence. We derive the relation of the model to Gaussian-ARMA models and to the Gaussian-GARCH(1,1) model. We investigate distributional properties of the process and discuss the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Additionally we analyze the copula moving aggregate process of order one, or MAG(1), as it is a basic building block. Last, we assess the model in a probabilistic forecasting study on a data series for German wind power production.

stat.ME↗