arXiv · 2610.24500
Investigating Length Bias and Robustness in LVLMs for Multiple-Choice Question Answering
Abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate strong performance on multiple-choice question answering (MCQA), yet their reliability under biased conditions remains underexplored. We investigate length bias, the systematic preference for longer answer options, through controlled benchmarks spanning fine-grained visual domains. LVLMs consistently favor longer options even when visually inconsistent, with accuracy dropping 2--38\% when correct answers are shorter and increasing 1--70\% when longer. This bias persists across model scales. Through layer-wise mechanistic analysis, we reveal that length bias emerges from late-layer suppression of visual evidence in favor of language-side length priors. Blurry-image experiments show that bias intensifies when visual evidence weakens, while abstention tests reveal that LVLMs struggle to refuse incorrect predictions. We propose and evaluate multiple inference-time mitigation strategies; while these provide partial improvements, none achieves deployable bias mitigation without relying on oracle information unavailable at inference time. These results underscore that inference-time interventions are insufficient, pointing to the need for architectural solutions and bias-aware training.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Md. Atabuzzaman, Hani Alomari, Chris Thomas. 2026-10-17. Investigating Length Bias and Robustness in LVLMs for Multiple-Choice Question Answering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24500
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.