arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.24477

Private Evaluation of High-Dimensional Functions

Abstract

We study differentially private black-box evaluation of arbitrary high-dimensional functions. Given a dataset $S$ and query access to a function $f$---whose sensitivity may be unknown or unbounded---the goal is to privately output an approximation to $f(S)$. The black-box evaluator can only query the value of $f$ over a down neighborhood of $S$ (i.e., those subsets of $S$ that are obtained by removing a bounded number of elements from $S$). We design generic black-box evaluators for both pure and approximate differential privacy through a reduction to high-dimensional private quasi-concave optimization (QCO). Our black-box evaluator enjoys a geometric notion of utility. Consider the vectors obtained by applying $f$ on sets in a down neighborhood of $S$. With high probability, the evaluator's output is guaranteed to be in the convex hull of these vectors. Our work generalizes the result of Linder et al. [LRSS25] for real-valued function evaluation to high dimensions. It also recovers the private center-point guarantees of Beimel et al. [BMNS19], with an explicit additive approximation to maximum Tukey depth. We also apply our evaluators to user-level quasi-concave and convex optimization, showing how they can improve upon the sample-and-aggregate baseline of Nissim et al. [NRS07] by replacing the multiplicative data overhead with an additive overhead. Finally, we show that our formulation of high dimensional black-box evaluation and high dimensional private QCO are equivalent up to a factor of the dimension: the hardest private evaluation instances already arise from the cases that $f$ is a (non-private) quasi-concave optimizer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mohammad Afzali, Hassan Ashtiani, Adam Smith. 2026-10-17. Private Evaluation of High-Dimensional Functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24477

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Smooth Flow Matching for Synthesizing Functional Data

Functional data, i.e., random functions observed over a continuous domain, are increasingly available in areas such as biomedical research, health informatics, and epidemiology. However, effective statistical analysis for functional data is often hindered by challenges such as privacy constraints, sparse and irregular sampling, infinite-dimensionality, and non-Gaussian structures. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel framework named Smooth Flow Matching (SFM), tailored for generative modeling of functional data that enables statistical analysis without exposing sensitive real data. Under a copula framework, SFM constructs a semiparametric smooth flow to generate infinite-dimensional functional data, free of Gaussianity and low-rank assumptions. It is computationally efficient, handles irregular observations, and guarantees the smoothness of the generated functions, offering a practical and flexible solution in scenarios where existing deep generative methods are not applicable. Through extensive simulation studies, we demonstrate the advantages of SFM in terms of both synthetic data quality and computational efficiency. We then apply SFM to generate clinical trajectory data from the MIMIC-IV patient electronic health records (EHR) longitudinal database. Our analysis showcases the ability of SFM to produce high-quality surrogate data for downstream tasks, highlighting its potential to boost the utility of EHR data for clinical applications.

stat.ML↗

Post-Selection Distributional Model Evaluation

Formal model evaluation methods typically certify that a model satisfies a prescribed target key performance indicator (KPI) level. However, in many applications, the relevant target KPI level may not be known a priori, and the user may instead wish to compare candidate models by analyzing the full trade-offs between performance and reliability achievable at test time by the models. This task, requiring the reliable estimate of the test-time KPI distributions, is made more complicated by the fact that the same data must often be used both to pre-select a subset of candidate models and to estimate their KPI distributions, causing a potential post-selection bias. In this work, we introduce post-selection distributional model evaluation (PS-DME), a general framework for statistically valid distributional model assessment after arbitrary data-dependent model pre-selection. Building on e-values, PS-DME controls post-selection false coverage rate (FCR) for the distributional KPI estimates and we establish explicit conditions under which it is provably more sample efficient than a baseline method based on sample splitting. Experiments on synthetic data, text-to-SQL decoding with large language models, and telecom network performance evaluation demonstrate that PS-DME enables reliable comparison of candidate configurations across a range of reliability levels, supporting the statistically reliable exploration of performance--reliability trade-offs.

stat.ML↗

Best of both worlds: Stochastic & adversarial best-arm identification

We study bandit best-arm identification with arbitrary and potentially adversarial rewards. A simple random uniform learner obtains the optimal rate of error in the adversarial scenario. However, this type of strategy is suboptimal when the rewards are sampled stochastically. Therefore, we ask: Can we design a learner that performs optimally in both the stochastic and adversarial problems while not being aware of the nature of the rewards? First, we show that designing such a learner is impossible in general. In particular, to be robust to adversarial rewards, we can only guarantee optimal rates of error on a subset of the stochastic problems. We give a lower bound that characterizes the optimal rate in stochastic problems if the strategy is constrained to be robust to adversarial rewards. Finally, we design a simple parameter-free algorithm and show that its probability of error matches (up to log factors) the lower bound in stochastic problems, and it is also robust to adversarial ones.

stat.ML↗