arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.24289

Unbounded Losses, Unchecked Inputs: Measuring the Safeguards of LLM Options-Trading Agents

Mengxiao Wang·Nitesh Saxena
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) agents now place options orders at retail brokers, and developers publish open-source options agents faster than anyone has examined them. Prior security work on trading agents scored academic equities designs by whether an attacker can flip a buy-or-sell decision. We present the first measurement of the options agents that brokers and developers ship, scored by the safeguards they enforce and by the worst loss their documented order paths can reach. We screened 765 GitHub repositories, broker documentation, and the research literature and found 215 eligible repositories and 8 broker-native agent interfaces. We then scored 26 systems, including every broker interface and every open-source project with at least 20 stars, on seven robustness and eleven security safeguards with cell-level evidence. The ecosystem is new: 198 of the 215 repositories were created in 2026, and 129 (60.0%) appeared in the two weeks around one options-trading hackathon. Of the 22 systems that can place orders, 10 enforce a pre-trade limit outside the model, yet none of the 26 authenticate their text sources or cross-check market data. Of the 26, 17 can execute with no mandatory human step and 13 can reach unbounded loss, including 6 of the 8 broker interfaces. Because an attacker who writes the agent's inputs can move an order's strike, expiry, volatility, and legs while its direction stays correct, options agents need loss limits enforced at the order boundary.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mengxiao Wang, Nitesh Saxena. 2026-10-16. Unbounded Losses, Unchecked Inputs: Measuring the Safeguards of LLM Options-Trading Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24289

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Mitigating Data Reconstruction Attacks in Federated Learning: Conditions, Bounds, and Theoretical Guarantees

Privacy attacks, particularly data reconstruction attacks, pose significant challenges to federated learning despite its promise in privacy-preserving collaborative training. This paper presents a comprehensive theoretical analysis of privacy leakage in federated learning through dual perspectives: linear algebra and optimization theory. By analyzing the client-update Jacobian, we identify conditions under which distinct data batches produce the same model update and derive a sufficient batch-size criterion for non-unique reconstruction. Through optimization theory, we establish a novel upper bound for privacy leakage that incorporates batch size, distortion extent, and other critical parameters. These theoretical insights elucidate the fundamental relationships between system parameters and privacy vulnerability, laying the groundwork for developing more robust privacy-preserving federated learning frameworks.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

A Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Method for Heterogeneous Clients

Federated Learning (FL) with Differential Privacy (DP) can ensure the protection of healthcare data privacy against malicious user attacks. However, FL with the DP method faces an inherent trade-off: stronger privacy protection degrades predictive accuracy due to injected noise. On the other hand, Homomorphic Encryption (HE) enables computations on encrypted data and the aggregation of encrypted gradients without introducing DP-induced noise, thereby potentially increasing the predictive accuracy. However, it may increase the computation cost. To improve the predictive accuracy while considering the computational ability of heterogeneous clients, we propose a Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning (PPML)-Hybrid method. In the proposed PPML-Hybrid method, clients distributedly select either HE or DP based on their computational resources, so that HE clients contribute noise-free updates while DP clients reduce computational overhead. Meanwhile, clients with high computational resources can flexibly adopt HE or DP according to their privacy needs. Performance evaluation on omics datasets shows that our proposed method achieves comparable predictive accuracy while significantly reducing computation time relative to HE-only. Additionally, it outperforms DP-only methods under equivalent or stricter privacy budgets.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Memory-Induced Tool-Drift in LLM Agents

LLM agents increasingly combine long-term memory for personalization with tool calling for taking actions. We study a failure of this combination: personality-driven preferences stored in memory (e.g., cost-consciousness, impatience, risk tolerance) silently shifting tool-call parameters in contexts where they do not apply. We call this memory-induced tool-drift and stress-test it with MEMDRIFT, an iteratively refined benchmark of 105 scenarios spanning five bias dimensions and seven professional domains. Measured as excess parameter degradation over a neutral-memory baseline, biased memories in MEMDRIFT induce drift in all eight models we evaluate, raising degradation rates to 0.38--0.83 versus 0.05--0.12 for neutral memories. The drift persists under three widely used memory frameworks. A vulnerability audit of 6,062 tools across 288 MCP servers demonstrates that real-world tools are also susceptible to this failure mode. Mechanistically, we find that biased memories act as implicit steering vectors along the same direction as explicit behavioral instructions and draw attention away from task-relevant context. Neither prompt-based defenses nor relevance filters offer a complete solution, motivating defenses at the intersection of memory management and tool calling.

cs.CR↗