arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.24253

Sharp Gromov Hyperbolicity Constants for Cartesian Products of Finitely Many Trees

Abstract

Let $X=T_1\times\cdots\times T_k$, $k\ge2$, be a Cartesian product of finite nontrivial trees with unit edges, and write $d_i=\diam T_i$, $S=\sum_id_i$ and $M=\max_id_i$. We prove that the thin-triangle hyperbolicity constant of the geodesic realization of $X$ is \[ \Rips(X)=\min\Bigl\{\frac S2,\ S-M+\frac12\Bigr\}, \] and that the four-point hyperbolicity constant of its vertex metric is the value \[ \mathcal{P}(d_1,\dots,d_k) = \max_{E\subseteq\{1,\dots,k\}} \min\left\{ \sum_{i\in E} d_i,\, \sum_{i\notin E} d_i \right\}. \] of the best two-way partition of the diameters. Both constants therefore depend only on the diameter vector, and their difference is governed by the partition imbalance $η$ of that vector: it equals $η/2$ when $M\le S-M$ and $1/2$ otherwise. In particular the two constants coincide if and only if the diameters admit a perfect partition, and their difference is unbounded. For $k\ge3$ the first formula exhibits a many-factor balancing phenomenon: several short factors can collectively balance the longest one and force the universal bound $\frac12\diam X$ to be attained. The proofs are self-contained and rest on an exact distance formula for the geodesic realization of $X$. For the $\ell_1$-product of the factors, i.e.\ the $\ell_1$-metric on the associated cube complex, we obtain $\Rips=\min\{S/2,S-M\}$, which identifies the half-unit above as a pure $1$-skeleton effect, and we show that the four-point formula holds for $\ell_1$-products of arbitrary $0$-hyperbolic metric spaces, in particular for weighted trees and $\R$-trees. We also treat products with unbounded factors and record algorithmic consequences.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Junior Michel, Anier Soria Lorente, Jean Marie-Vilaire. 2026-10-16. Sharp Gromov Hyperbolicity Constants for Cartesian Products of Finitely Many Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24253

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotics of Constrained Quantization for Compactly Supported Measures

We study constrained quantization of a compactly supported probability $P$ on $\mathbb{R}^D$ by codebooks in a nonempty closed set $S$. For $0 0$ on a fixed source set $F$ bounds $Δ_{n,r}$ below by the classical $β$-power quantization cost of $ν_F=T_*(wP|_F)$. If $dν_F=\widehat w\,dη$ for a compactly supported reference probability $η$ and $\widehat w\in A_p(η)$, $1<p<\infty$, then $Δ_{n,r}\geν_F(\mathbb{R}^D)[\widehat w]_{A_p(η)}^{-1}q_{n,β/p}(η)^β$. These comparisons yield bounds for the quantization dimensions defined by $e_{n,r}-L_r$ and $Δ_{n,r}^{1/r}$, with distinct behavior at positive and zero baselines. Convex and uniformly prox-regular constraints supply the growth weights through their projection inequalities. Circle and lifted Cantor distributions give matching quadratic-excess rates, while rectifiable weighted projections give lower Zador estimates.

math.MG↗

Notes on uniform contractions of congruent balls

In this note, we obtain stronger results on uniform contractions of intersections and unions of congruent balls, thereby extending previous partial confirmations of the Kneser-Poulsen conjecture in these settings. In addition, we establish Blaschke-Santaló-type inequalities for r-ball bodies.

math.MG↗

Exponential improvements in Rado's covering problem

Let $B^d$ denote the $d$-dimensional Euclidean ball of unit radius. What is the largest constant $f(B^d) \in [0,1]$ with the property that every finite collection $\mathcal{C}$ of unit balls in $\mathbb{R}^d$ admits a disjoint sub-collection $\mathcal{S}$ occupying at least a fraction $f(B^d)$ of the volume of $\mathcal{C}$? This problem was first raised by T. Radó in 1928, for axis-parallel squares in the plane; the author was motivated by a classical covering lemma in real analysis due to Vitali. The case of Euclidean balls was first considered by R. Rado in 1949. Until last year the best known estimates on $f(B^d)$ for unit balls where very far apart: \[ (1+ε_d) 3^{-d} \leq f(B^d) \leq 2^{-d}, \] where $0<ε_d=o_{d\rightarrow \infty}(1)$. Recently, the authors of this note observed that an exponential improvement on the upper bound follows from the Kabatiansky--Levenshtein spherical code bound, while the lower bound was improved by a linear factor by C.~Xie and G.~Ge (see arxiv:2608.09744). The current best estimates for large $d$ are \[ c \cdot d \cdot 3^{-d} \leq f(B^d) \leq 2.447^{-d}, \] where $c>0$ is an absolute constant. Here we offer the first exponential improvement of the lower bound in almost 80 years, which narrows the gap to: \[ 2.910^{-d} \leq f(B^d) \leq 2.447^{-d}. \] Our method is constructive and yields a polynomial time algorithm for finding a disjoint sub-collection realizing the estimate. Moreover the same technique gives similar exponentially improved lower bounds for all symmetric convex bodies satisfying a uniform convexity assumption, e.g., $\ell^p$-balls for all $p\in (1,\infty)$.

math.MG↗