arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.24237

Usability, User Experience, and Acceptability of the Trail Making Test in Virtual Reality in Younger and Older Adults

Panagiotis Kourtesis·Dante O'Connor·Sarah E. MacPherson
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Immersive virtual reality (VR) adaptations of neuropsychological tests change how a test operates. Before their scores are interpreted, the individuals they are intended to assess should find them usable, acceptable and tolerable, and for older adults this evidence is usually missing. This study evaluated the experience of the Trail Making Test in Virtual Reality (TMT-VR), a head-gaze adaptation of the Trail Making Test that requires no hand-held controller, in 47 younger (20-38 years) and 44 older adults (64-81 years). After the task, participants rated usability, pragmatic and hedonic user experience, acceptability, and cybersickness. The study had three aims: to compare the two age groups on these ratings; to examine whether the ratings were associated with age group, gaming and technology experience, and whether cybersickness was associated with motion sickness susceptibility; and to examine whether the ratings were related to TMT-VR completion and error-adjusted times. Both groups rated the TMT-VR as highly usable, acceptable and pleasant to use. Older adults gave slightly lower usability and pragmatic ratings, but neither the age-group differences nor the associations with age group or previous experience were statistically significant after correction. Cybersickness was low, with 38 of the 91 participants reporting no symptoms; it did not differ between the age groups and was not associated with motion sickness susceptibility. No correlation between the ratings and TMT-VR performance survived correction. The TMT-VR with head-gaze selection is therefore usable, acceptable and well tolerated by older as well as younger adults. Because the ratings were favourable across the whole range of TMT-VR scores, slower or less accurate performance is unlikely to reflect difficulty with the interface.

Explore related subjects

cs.HCcs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Panagiotis Kourtesis, Dante O'Connor, Sarah E. MacPherson. 2026-10-16. Usability, User Experience, and Acceptability of the Trail Making Test in Virtual Reality in Younger and Older Adults. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24237

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

FlexMind: Supporting Deeper Creative Thinking with LLMs

Expert ideation requires more than generating ideas. People must articulate trade-offs, develop mitigations, and compare parallel directions, yet this reasoning process is cognitively demanding. Existing ideation tools fall short by either focusing only on expanding or organizing the idea space, or by offering evaluations without supporting mitigation generation and continued reasoning over newly introduced trade-offs. We present FlexMind, an AI-augmented system that proactively scaffolds multi-threaded trade-off-mitigation chains within a structured workspace. FlexMind helps users surface concrete trade-offs, generate actionable mitigations, and navigate and expand multiple idea branches. In a controlled study (n=20), FlexMind supported deeper exploration without sacrificing breadth and produced higher-quality ideas, as judged by domain experts, compared to a baseline. A case study with six experts (n=6) further reveals how FlexMind supports idea analysis while helping uncover new solutions. These results inform implications for enhancing human-AI co-creation.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

ZORO: Active Controls to Support Rule Following in Vibe Coding

Rules files (e.g., AGENTS$.$md, CLAUDE$.$md) are the primary mechanism for human-agent alignment when developers vibe code. However, they remain passive: it is not immediately apparent when rules are being used or followed, or how to improve them. To transform rules from passive text into active controls, we introduce ZORO, an interactive interface that integrates directly with a coding agent and anchors rules to every step of the coding process. After an agent generates an initial plan, ZORO enriches the plan with rules, enforces the rules during implementation by requiring the agent prove that each rule was followed, and allows users to provide in-situ feedback when they are unsatisfied with a rule application to evolve the ruleset. A technical evaluation shows that coding agents follow rules more with ZORO than without. A user study demonstrates a change in people's behavior and cognitive strategies when rules are at the forefront of vibe coding. We discuss how making rules active in agentic systems unlocks broader opportunities for human-agent alignment in coding settings and beyond.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Calibrating LLM Judges for Human and AI Conversations

Measuring how successful a conversation is remains difficult, even for humans judging spoken dialogue. We evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs as pointwise and pairwise judges of conversational success on CANDOR, finding pointwise scoring correlates moderately with human ratings, while pairwise comparison suffers from long transcripts and positional bias. Since this leaves judge scores incomparable across models, we propose a small anchor set and a calibration function that calibrates any judge onto a shared, interpretable scale. We further release the Voice Arena Goal Dataset (VA), 200 task-oriented human-AI and human-agent conversations with pairwise annotations, revealing a substantial gap between current judges and human-level discrimination. Using VA, we test whether CANDOR-fitted calibration transfers to human-AI conversations, finding it brings judges onto a shared scale despite never observing VA during fitting.

cs.HC↗