arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.24192

The wealth-to-salary ratio: a simple indicator of inequality

Jhordan Silveira de Borba·Sebastian Gonçalves·Celia Anteneodo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In previous studies, using agent-based simulations of a model of a capitalist economy proposed by Ian Wright, we showed that inequality in both wealth and income distributions is largely governed by a single key parameter: the ratio between average wealth per capita and the mean salary, denoted by $R$. This parameter captures the relative importance of accumulated assets compared with labor income. In the model, larger values of $R$ are systematically associated with higher levels of inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient. In the present work, we investigate whether this relationship is also observed in real-world economies. Using empirical data from the World Inequality Database (WID) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), we construct empirical estimates of $R$ and compare them with standard measures of income and wealth inequality. We find a positive relation between $R$ and inequality across several empirical settings, with the strongest relationships observed for mature and advanced economies. These results provide empirical support for the role of the wealth-to-salary ratio as a simple macroscopic indicator associated with economic inequality, while also highlighting the limitations imposed by differences in data definitions and measurement across countries and periods.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNphysics.soc-phq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jhordan Silveira de Borba, Sebastian Gonçalves, Celia Anteneodo. 2026-10-16. The wealth-to-salary ratio: a simple indicator of inequality. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24192

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Time is Knowledge: Response Times in Binary Response Models

Response times contain information about economically relevant but unobserved variables like willingness to pay, preference intensity, quality, or happiness. We provide a general characterization of the properties of latent variables that can be detected using response time data. Our theoretical framework unifies and generalizes existing results in the literature and gives rise to many new applications. We illustrate the novel insights that the method can deliver through three empirical applications: identifying an optimal nudge, testing decreasing marginal happiness of income, and predicting treatment heterogeneity.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

The economics of global personality diversity

Understanding why national economic performance differs remains a central question in economics. Although institutions and demographic diversity are established correlates of economic development, the contribution of within-population personality diversity has received limited attention. We introduce the Global Personality Diversity Index ($Ψ$-GPDI), a measure of psychological heterogeneity derived from assessments of 760,242 individuals across 135 countries using 30 facets of the Big Five personality traits. We show that most variation in these facets occurs within rather than between countries. Across countries with available economic data, personality diversity is positively associated with GDP per person employed, accounting for 19.9% of the variance in an adjusted single-predictor model. Including $Ψ$-GPDI alongside institutional quality and immigrant diversity increases the model's explanatory power by approximately 5.7%. Personality diversity is also weakly correlated with immigrant diversity, suggesting that the two measures capture distinct characteristics of national populations. These findings identify psychological heterogeneity as a potentially important and previously underexamined dimension of national human capital. Although the observational design does not establish causality, the results motivate further investigation of how personality diversity interacts with institutions, occupational specialization, and economic development.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

When Better Opportunities Backfire: Service Worker Responses to Parallel AI Deployment in Customer Acquisition

As AI voice agents get deployed in high-volume contact centers, firms can route low-intent leads to AI and allocate high-intent leads to human workers. Drawing on sequential search theory, we posit that AI-induced task allocation reshapes work, enriching opportunities facing human workers but also raising their reservation value for continuing with the lead in hand, making them less willing to persist. We study the effects of an AI voice-agent deployment at a Chinese online health-insurance brokerage using more than a half million customer outreach records surrounding the rollout. Adopting a regression-discontinuity-in-time design, we trace how worker behavior changes across the workday. Results show that the enrichment of human-facing opportunities concentrates early in the workday, raising the probability that a call is a high-intent lead by about 23 percentage points on the first three calls and fading to zero later. However, customer acquisition by human workers declines precisely where the enrichment is greatest, falling about 5 percentage points on the first three calls and flattening over the day. Consistent with the theorized reservation value mechanism, workers reallocate their earliest leads about 8 percentage points more often and persist less with them, shortening those calls by about 13%. A calibrated decomposition analysis further shows that the modest gain from improved lead ordering is outweighed by a much larger negative behavioral response. By reshaping the quality and within-workday distribution of opportunities, parallel AI deployment alters how workers pursue tasks, highlighting opportunity distribution as an important service operations state variable beyond workload and congestion.

econ.GN↗