arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.24055

ToolRosetta: Surface-Form Invariance of Tool-Call Guards

Hasan Demirkiran·Jens Ernstberger
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Step-level guards for tool-using agents are evaluated on tidy JSON tool calls, but deployed coding agents act through execute_bash and execute_code tools whose payloads are strings. We introduce ToolRosetta, which re-renders every candidate action in the AgentDojo and AgentHarm splits of TS-Bench as a Python call, as a shell command, and without the agent's rationale. The renderings are produced by code and verified by round-trip parsing, so the user request, the history, the label and the action's effect stay fixed while only the surface form changes. Across eleven guards with two placebo controls, frontier and strong open-weight guards are stable: no frontier error rate moves by more than 3.4 points. Four of five specialized agent guards are not: under the shell form their false-positive rates rise by 21 to 47 points on AgentDojo, and TS-Guard's by 38 points on its own home benchmark, blocking between a third and nine in ten benign actions; the fifth, StepGuard, does not move. A small open guard drifts five points more permissive. Removing the agent's rationale moves most guards whose input carries it, in guard-specific directions. A request-blind control on one guard shows that the rationale is where intent is read from. A parser that restores the canonical call in front of the guard removes the effect for these renderings, by construction. Benchmark accuracy on JSON calls does not predict a guard's operating point behind a code-acting agent.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hasan Demirkiran, Jens Ernstberger. 2026-10-16. ToolRosetta: Surface-Form Invariance of Tool-Call Guards. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24055

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Mitigating Data Reconstruction Attacks in Federated Learning: Conditions, Bounds, and Theoretical Guarantees

Privacy attacks, particularly data reconstruction attacks, pose significant challenges to federated learning despite its promise in privacy-preserving collaborative training. This paper presents a comprehensive theoretical analysis of privacy leakage in federated learning through dual perspectives: linear algebra and optimization theory. By analyzing the client-update Jacobian, we identify conditions under which distinct data batches produce the same model update and derive a sufficient batch-size criterion for non-unique reconstruction. Through optimization theory, we establish a novel upper bound for privacy leakage that incorporates batch size, distortion extent, and other critical parameters. These theoretical insights elucidate the fundamental relationships between system parameters and privacy vulnerability, laying the groundwork for developing more robust privacy-preserving federated learning frameworks.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

A Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Method for Heterogeneous Clients

Federated Learning (FL) with Differential Privacy (DP) can ensure the protection of healthcare data privacy against malicious user attacks. However, FL with the DP method faces an inherent trade-off: stronger privacy protection degrades predictive accuracy due to injected noise. On the other hand, Homomorphic Encryption (HE) enables computations on encrypted data and the aggregation of encrypted gradients without introducing DP-induced noise, thereby potentially increasing the predictive accuracy. However, it may increase the computation cost. To improve the predictive accuracy while considering the computational ability of heterogeneous clients, we propose a Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning (PPML)-Hybrid method. In the proposed PPML-Hybrid method, clients distributedly select either HE or DP based on their computational resources, so that HE clients contribute noise-free updates while DP clients reduce computational overhead. Meanwhile, clients with high computational resources can flexibly adopt HE or DP according to their privacy needs. Performance evaluation on omics datasets shows that our proposed method achieves comparable predictive accuracy while significantly reducing computation time relative to HE-only. Additionally, it outperforms DP-only methods under equivalent or stricter privacy budgets.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Memory-Induced Tool-Drift in LLM Agents

LLM agents increasingly combine long-term memory for personalization with tool calling for taking actions. We study a failure of this combination: personality-driven preferences stored in memory (e.g., cost-consciousness, impatience, risk tolerance) silently shifting tool-call parameters in contexts where they do not apply. We call this memory-induced tool-drift and stress-test it with MEMDRIFT, an iteratively refined benchmark of 105 scenarios spanning five bias dimensions and seven professional domains. Measured as excess parameter degradation over a neutral-memory baseline, biased memories in MEMDRIFT induce drift in all eight models we evaluate, raising degradation rates to 0.38--0.83 versus 0.05--0.12 for neutral memories. The drift persists under three widely used memory frameworks. A vulnerability audit of 6,062 tools across 288 MCP servers demonstrates that real-world tools are also susceptible to this failure mode. Mechanistically, we find that biased memories act as implicit steering vectors along the same direction as explicit behavioral instructions and draw attention away from task-relevant context. Neither prompt-based defenses nor relevance filters offer a complete solution, motivating defenses at the intersection of memory management and tool calling.

cs.CR↗