arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.24032

Visual Causal-chain Bookmarking: Retrieval-Weighted Credit Assignment for Reinforcement Learning from Delayed Reward

Prathap Selvakumar
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

RL agents trained on a single trajectory-level return face a credit-assignment problem: when a reward arrives many steps after the decision that caused it, every action gets the same signal regardless of causal responsibility. This paper studies Visual Causal-chain Bookmarking (VCBM), which concentrates credit on the decision points that determine an episode's return, via two instantiations. The first targets a fully observed, low-dimensional MDP (a delayed-reward watch-repair task), where VCBM statistically discovers which state components the agent causally controls and estimates per-decision-point action values directly, evaluated against ground truth and RUDDER, an LSTM-based baseline. VCBM converges to 95.07% correct decisions in a mean of 1,532.3 episodes across 20 seeds, versus RUDDER's slower, more variable convergence (mean 3,327.1 episodes; p<0.001); VCBM's discovered causal structure exactly matches ground truth in all seeds. The second targets a partially observed, language-based setting: an LLM agent trained with Leave-One-Out PPO (LOOP) in AppWorld, where causal discovery is intractable and a structural heuristic (state-mutating tool calls) substitutes for it, with credit distributed via retrieval over episodic memory and blended with LOOP's advantage. Over 200 iterations on identical Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct/LoRA/FSDP2 configurations, VCBM-blended LOOP improves task success over plain LOOP (0.354 vs. 0.458), reduces final-step max importance weight, and improves token efficiency, with a small KL exception favouring LOOP. The watch-repair result supports the claim that weighting causally relevant steps is more sample-efficient than an undifferentiated baseline or a learned return-redistribution network; the AppWorld result, limited to one seed per arm by a 2-GPU budget, is a compute-limited demonstration at a harder, natural-language scale, not a statistical confirmation.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Prathap Selvakumar. 2026-10-16. Visual Causal-chain Bookmarking: Retrieval-Weighted Credit Assignment for Reinforcement Learning from Delayed Reward. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24032

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Heterogeneous Sheaf Neural Networks

Heterogeneous graphs, whose nodes and edges can belong to different types and feature spaces, arise in many real-world domains, including biology, recommendation, social networks, and computer systems. Existing heterogeneous graph neural networks typically handle this heterogeneity at the architectural level through relation-specific modules, meta-path machinery or type-aware attention, which often leads to increasingly specialised parameter-heavy designs. In this work, we propose HetSheaf, a framework for learning heterogeneous graphs through cellular sheaves. Instead of encoding heterogeneity solely in the architecture, HetSheaf represents it directly in the underlying data structure by assigning type-aware local feature spaces and learning restriction maps conditioned on node features, node types, and edge types. To support graph-level prediction, we further introduce SheafPool, a universal stalk-space readout that aggregates node representations while being invariant to local changes of basis, thereby making graph classification with sheaf networks well-defined and achieving an F1 Score up to 42 percentage points higher than mean pooling. Across a diverse suite of benchmarks (node classification, link prediction and graph classification). HetSheaf consistently achieves up to 2 percentage points higher performance (up to 94.97% Macro F1 Score on node classification and up to 99.62% on link prediction) on the Heterogeneous Graph Benchmark (HGB) framework against homogeneous (GCN, GAT, GIN, GraphSAGE), heterogeneous (R-GCN, HAT, HGT) and type-agnostic sheaf baselines, while reducing the number of parameters by up to 10$\times$.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Risk-averse learning with delayed feedback

In real-world scenarios, risk-averse learning is valuable for mitigating potential adverse outcomes. However, the delayed feedback makes it challenging to assess and manage risk effectively. In this paper, we investigate risk-averse learning using Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) as risk measure, while incorporating feedback with random but bounded delays. We develop two risk-averse learning algorithms that rely on one-point and two-point zeroth-order optimization approaches, respectively. The dynamic regrets of the algorithms are analyzed in terms of the cumulative delay and the number of total samplings. In the absence of delay, the regret bounds match the established bounds of zeroth-order stochastic gradient methods for risk-averse learning. Furthermore, the two-point risk-averse learning outperforms the one-point algorithm by achieving a smaller regret bound. We provide numerical experiments on a dynamic pricing problem to demonstrate the performance of the algorithms.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

On the Value of Cross-Modal Misalignment in Multimodal Representation Learning

Multimodal representation learning, exemplified by multimodal contrastive learning (MMCL) using image-text pairs, aims to learn powerful representations by aligning cues across modalities. This approach relies on the core assumption that the exemplar image-text pairs constitute two representations of an identical concept. However, recent research has revealed that real-world datasets often exhibit \emph{cross-modal misalignment}. There are two distinct viewpoints on how to address this issue: one suggests mitigating the misalignment, and the other leveraging it. We seek here to reconcile these seemingly opposing perspectives and to provide a practical guide for practitioners. Using latent variable models, we thus formalize cross-modal misalignment by introducing two specific mechanisms: \emph{selection bias}, where some semantic variables are absent in the text, and \emph{perturbation bias}, where semantic variables are altered---both leading to misalignment in data pairs. Our theoretical analysis shows that, under suitable assumptions, population global minimizers of an alignment--entropy surrogate yield representations that depend only on the semantic variables unaffected by selection and perturbation biases and locally identify this subset almost surely. Extensive empirical studies on synthetic data and real image-text datasets further examine how cross-modal misalignment shapes semantic predictability and downstream performance, shedding light on its nuanced impact on multimodal representation learning.

cs.LG↗