Beyond Prediction: A Component-Level Study of Concept Recovery in In-Context Learning

Xufeng Liu; Fang Wan; Yi Liu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.23936

Beyond Prediction: A Component-Level Study of Concept Recovery in In-Context Learning

Xufeng Liu·Fang Wan·Yi Liu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In-context learning (ICL) enables language models to make accurate predictions from demonstrations, but prediction success alone does not reveal the extent to which the underlying concept has been recovered. Existing evaluations typically assess recovery at the level of the whole concept, making it difficult to identify which components are recovered and to separate model limitations from ambiguity in the demonstrations. We introduce a component-level framework for concept recovery that decomposes concepts into their defining components and uses controlled structural interventions to evaluate both component-level and whole-concept recovery under identifiable demonstrations. Across four instruction-tuned LLMs and three composition forms, we find that models often achieve high prediction accuracy despite poor whole-concept recovery, with systematic over-specification of relevant attributes and level constraints. Individual structural components are generally insufficient for whole-concept recovery, whereas jointly specifying complementary components, particularly relevant attributes and their level constraints, substantially improves recovery. However, this improvement is fragile: a single plausible but unnecessary level constraint can substantially disrupt recovery. Finally, joint supervision of recovery and implicit prediction substantially improves recovery while preserving prediction performance, with the learned capability transferring across composition forms. Overall, our component-level analysis provides a more diagnostic view of what models recover from demonstrations than the existing holistic view.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Xufeng Liu, Fang Wan, Yi Liu. 2026-10-07. Beyond Prediction: A Component-Level Study of Concept Recovery in In-Context Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23936

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Heterogeneous Sheaf Neural Networks

Heterogeneous graphs, whose nodes and edges can belong to different types and feature spaces, arise in many real-world domains, including biology, recommendation, social networks, and computer systems. Existing heterogeneous graph neural networks typically handle this heterogeneity at the architectural level through relation-specific modules, meta-path machinery or type-aware attention, which often leads to increasingly specialised parameter-heavy designs. In this work, we propose HetSheaf, a framework for learning heterogeneous graphs through cellular sheaves. Instead of encoding heterogeneity solely in the architecture, HetSheaf represents it directly in the underlying data structure by assigning type-aware local feature spaces and learning restriction maps conditioned on node features, node types, and edge types. To support graph-level prediction, we further introduce SheafPool, a universal stalk-space readout that aggregates node representations while being invariant to local changes of basis, thereby making graph classification with sheaf networks well-defined and achieving an F1 Score up to 42 percentage points higher than mean pooling. Across a diverse suite of benchmarks (node classification, link prediction and graph classification). HetSheaf consistently achieves up to 2 percentage points higher performance (up to 94.97% Macro F1 Score on node classification and up to 99.62% on link prediction) on the Heterogeneous Graph Benchmark (HGB) framework against homogeneous (GCN, GAT, GIN, GraphSAGE), heterogeneous (R-GCN, HAT, HGT) and type-agnostic sheaf baselines, while reducing the number of parameters by up to 10$\times$.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Risk-averse learning with delayed feedback

In real-world scenarios, risk-averse learning is valuable for mitigating potential adverse outcomes. However, the delayed feedback makes it challenging to assess and manage risk effectively. In this paper, we investigate risk-averse learning using Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) as risk measure, while incorporating feedback with random but bounded delays. We develop two risk-averse learning algorithms that rely on one-point and two-point zeroth-order optimization approaches, respectively. The dynamic regrets of the algorithms are analyzed in terms of the cumulative delay and the number of total samplings. In the absence of delay, the regret bounds match the established bounds of zeroth-order stochastic gradient methods for risk-averse learning. Furthermore, the two-point risk-averse learning outperforms the one-point algorithm by achieving a smaller regret bound. We provide numerical experiments on a dynamic pricing problem to demonstrate the performance of the algorithms.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

On the Value of Cross-Modal Misalignment in Multimodal Representation Learning

Multimodal representation learning, exemplified by multimodal contrastive learning (MMCL) using image-text pairs, aims to learn powerful representations by aligning cues across modalities. This approach relies on the core assumption that the exemplar image-text pairs constitute two representations of an identical concept. However, recent research has revealed that real-world datasets often exhibit \emph{cross-modal misalignment}. There are two distinct viewpoints on how to address this issue: one suggests mitigating the misalignment, and the other leveraging it. We seek here to reconcile these seemingly opposing perspectives and to provide a practical guide for practitioners. Using latent variable models, we thus formalize cross-modal misalignment by introducing two specific mechanisms: \emph{selection bias}, where some semantic variables are absent in the text, and \emph{perturbation bias}, where semantic variables are altered---both leading to misalignment in data pairs. Our theoretical analysis shows that, under suitable assumptions, population global minimizers of an alignment--entropy surrogate yield representations that depend only on the semantic variables unaffected by selection and perturbation biases and locally identify this subset almost surely. Extensive empirical studies on synthetic data and real image-text datasets further examine how cross-modal misalignment shapes semantic predictability and downstream performance, shedding light on its nuanced impact on multimodal representation learning.

cs.LG↗