arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.23027

ASE: Attribution-Guided Semantic Evolution for Time Series Forecasting

Abstract

External text can supply predictive information absent from numerical histories, but its value depends on how it is represented, combined and deployed. We present Attribution-guided Semantic Evolution (ASE), a modular framework for constructing textual factors, evaluating their conditional contribution, and deploying validation-selected numerical--textual predictors. ASE supports task-specific implementations with lexical measurements, semantic primitives or evolved event/state factors, coupled to suitable numerical experts. Its feedback-based implementation uses conditional refitting diagnostics to guide factor revision and combination search. We evaluate ASE on the four text-associated TESS datasets and dynamic CSI 300 stock ranking. The four forecasting implementations obtain test MSEs of 0.001041, 0.022439, 0.333115 and 1.8150, each below the corresponding published TESS score. On CSI 300, the frozen text-fusion implementation improves mean RankIC by 0.000642 over its numerical expert and by 0.000701 over matched shuffled text, with positive differences in all five seeds. Controlled text perturbations support functional reliance on text correspondence, while incumbent retention prevents regressions in the measured development criterion. Together, the experiments characterize ASE at two levels: forecasting performance of task-specific implementations and the conditional contributions of individual modules.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuxuan Zheng, Zhaoyang Li, Purui Liu, Hengbo Xiao, Guannan He. 2026-10-16. ASE: Attribution-Guided Semantic Evolution for Time Series Forecasting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23027

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

GVPO: Group Variance Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Post-Training

Post-training plays a crucial role in refining and aligning large language models to meet specific tasks and human preferences. While recent advancements in post-training techniques, such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), leverage increased sampling with relative reward scoring to achieve superior performance, these methods often suffer from training instability that limits their practical adoption. As a next step, we present Group Variance Policy Optimization (GVPO). GVPO incorporates the analytical solution to KL-constrained reward maximization directly into its gradient weights, ensuring alignment with the optimal policy. The method provides intuitive physical interpretations: its gradient mirrors the mean squared error between the central distance of implicit rewards and that of actual rewards. GVPO offers two key advantages: (1) it guarantees a unique optimal solution, exactly the KL-constrained reward maximization objective, (2) it supports flexible sampling distributions that avoids on-policy and importance sampling limitations. By unifying theoretical guarantees with practical adaptability, GVPO establishes a new paradigm for reliable and versatile LLM post-training.

cs.AI↗

NEXUS: Learning Safety Constraints and Action Models for Safe and Robust Embodied Planning

Large language models (LLMs) enable embodied agents to plan from naturallanguage instructions, yet their actions may be physically infeasible or hazardous. Existing neuro-symbolic learners primarily refine execution models, while formal safety methods acquire or enforce safety constraints. This separation limits the reuse of both execution corrections and safety knowledge across tasks. We present NEXUS, a modular neuro-symbolic framework that jointly maintains a PDDL domain model and an LTL safety specification. Execution failures are used to repair action schemas, whereas detected hazards are converted into reusable LTL constraints through hierarchical semantic and translation sampling with equivalence consensus. Accumulated constraints are enforced through LTL progression during symbolic search; comparing constrained and unconstrained search outcomes distinguishes physical unreachability from safety-induced refusal. Experiments on SafeAgentBench evaluation set show that NEXUS achieves the best overall trade-off between safetask completion and unsafe-task refusal, while maintaining low violation rates under jailbreak attacks. Ablations confirm the complementary benefits of PDDLdomain refinement and LTL-constraint accumulation.

cs.AI↗

APeB: Benchmarking Personalization Ability of Large Language Model Agents

LLM-powered agents struggle with personalization when users issue raw, underspecified queries. In this setting, agents must infer latent intent, extract preferences from noisy interaction histories, and select among competing alternatives. Existing benchmarks rarely test this capability, as they often rely on user-refined queries or simplified histories. We introduce personalized product search (PPS), a testbed for agentic personalization under raw queries and diverse histories. We construct Agent Personalized Benchmark (APeB) from action logs, pairing underspecified intents with rich histories and user-viewed candidate items. Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs with multi-step agent workflows, we find that models handle explicit queries well but struggle with early-stage queries requiring intent and preference discovery. Rubric analysis attributes this gap mainly to ineffective history use. A simple history-aware query-refinement pipeline, VQRA, yields consistent gains, highlighting the need for dedicated history-utilization modules in personalized agents.

cs.AI↗