arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.22864

The Source of Data Value: Consumer Disclosure, Access Design, and Platform Monetization

Hexiao Liu·Lijian Lu·Mingzheng Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Digital marketplaces increasingly earn revenue from transaction commissions and seller-facing data services. Sellers may purchase data to increase revenue or avoid competing with an informed rival. We examine how consumer disclosure rights shape these motives and the platform's incentive to provide data. We develop a game-theoretic model of a commissioned platform, two differentiated sellers, and privacy-sensitive consumers. Data generates value through bilateral sales-revenue gains and competition threats arising from asymmetric access. Under mandatory collection, the platform can monetize defensive adoption, even when bilateral personalization reduces seller revenue. Under voluntary disclosure, anonymous purchasing and strictly positive privacy costs make unilateral disclosure unattractive in the baseline. Exclusive access thus yields no usable information, restores sellers' no-data rejection payoffs, and eliminates defensive fees. Profitable provision therefore requires nonnegative bilateral revenue gains. Under full fee extraction, sellers retain their no-data net profits. This revenue alignment does not guarantee welfare gains: additional transactions may benefit consumers, whereas segmentation in an already covered market can raise anonymous prices and reduce welfare. Capping anonymous offers at their no-data benchmark protects individual consumers and limits positive-mass provision to the transaction-creation region. Extensions consider access choice, heterogeneous privacy costs, imperfect identification, and limited contractual credibility. Platforms should evaluate data services based on both bilateral-use and seller-rejection outcomes, and sellers should distinguish revenue-enhancing from defensive investments. Regulators should distinguish equal-access rules from effective consumer control and monitor pricing in anonymous channels.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTecon.GNmath.OCq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hexiao Liu, Lijian Lu, Mingzheng Wang. 2026-10-16. The Source of Data Value: Consumer Disclosure, Access Design, and Platform Monetization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22864

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Multi-agent Assortment Optimization in Sequential Matching Markets

Motivated by the challenges faced by choice-based matching platforms, in this work, we study a generalization of the foundational model introduced by Ashlagi et al. (2022). Specifically, this model consists of two sides (e.g., customers and suppliers) who have preferences over the opposite side in the form of discrete choice models. A matching is realized through a two-step process where the platform's decision is to initially present to each agent on one side an assortment of users of the opposite side. The ultimate goal of the platform is to maximize the total expected revenue collected from the matching. Due to the computational complexity of this problem, we focus on the design of approximation algorithms with constant-factor guarantees for the constrained version of the problem under general choice preferences. First, to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to draw connections with the literature of submodular optimization and show that one-sided choice-oblivious approaches perform arbitrarily bad. Second, we show that, for the general setting, there exists a two-sided choice-aware randomized algorithm that achieves a (1-1/e)-approximation factor, which is the best possible. Third, we design an algorithm that is asymptotically optimal when one side follows the well-known multinomial-logit (MNL) choice model under the small probability regime. Fourth, we provide a simple and effective algorithm with a 1/4-approximation guarantee for the unconstrained setting with both sides following MNL models. Finally, we assess the performance of our proposed methods with a detailed computational study and discuss several extensions.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

How a Cooperative-Override Circuit Suppresses Nash Play in Large Language Models

On the named Prisoner's Dilemma under direct prompting, three larger instruction-tuned models, Llama-3-70B, Qwen2.5-32B, and Qwen2.5-72B, lock at full cooperation, the metric's maximum distance from Nash with zero variance across replicates, while Llama-3-8B plays near-Nash. Opening the models, a logit-lens analysis finds a distributed cooperative override. Intermediate readouts lean toward the Nash action through roughly three quarters of network depth before a late surge toward cooperation, and the final layer settles the contest. The size of that final correction, not the surge, rank-matches chain-of-thought behavior across scale and two architectures. In the 8B the override is a single causally controllable direction in the residual stream; steering it dials the decision, and clamping its component at one position of one layer moves the choice strictly monotonically, Spearman rho = 1.000, with generation fluent. The circuit is lexical. It survives name removal and payoff rescaling but disengages when Cooperate and Defect are replaced with neutral labels, and on 48 payoff-random games with neutral surfaces no model locks cooperative on any dilemma or shows general equilibrium competence. In mixed-model populations a single Nash-playing agent collapses cooperation contagiously. What suppresses Nash play in large language models is a word-triggered circuit rather than missing competence, and it can be measured, bounded, and controlled.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Optimizing Social Utility in Sequential Experiments

Regulatory approval of products in high-stakes domains such as drug development requires statistical evidence of safety and efficacy through large-scale randomized controlled trials. However, the high financial cost of these trials may deter developers who lack absolute certainty in their product's efficacy, ultimately stifling the development of `moonshot' products that could offer high social utility. To address this inefficiency, in this paper, we introduce a statistical protocol for experimentation where the product developer (the agent) conducts a randomized controlled trial sequentially and the regulator (the principal) partially subsidizes its cost. By modeling the protocol using a belief Markov decision process, we show that the agent's optimal strategy can be found efficiently using dynamic programming. Further, we show that the social utility is a piecewise linear and convex function over the subsidy level the principal selects, and thus the socially optimal subsidy can also be found efficiently using divide-and-conquer. Simulation experiments using publicly available data on antibiotic development and approval demonstrate that our statistical protocol can be used to increase social utility by more than $35$$\%$ relative to standard, non-sequential protocols.

cs.GT↗