arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.22513

Sharp Instrumental Variable Bounds under The Marginal Sensitivity Model

Antonio Olivas-Martinez·Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Marginal sensitivity models bound the degree of unmeasured confounding but do not incorporate instrumental-variable restrictions, even when an instrument is available. We develop a framework combining these models with instrumental-variable assumptions to sharpen inference on population treatment effects without requiring treatment monotonicity or treatment-effect homogeneity. For continuous and finite ordered outcomes, we characterize sharp identified sets for potential-outcome means and the average treatment effect, together with observable restrictions implied jointly by the instrumental-variable and sensitivity assumptions. The bounds admit explicit formulas for finite ordered outcomes, while optimization over prespecified threshold classes provides tractable outer bounds for continuous outcomes. We develop cross-fitted one-step estimators that accommodate flexible nuisance estimation. Under suitable conditions, the resulting outward confidence sets asymptotically cover the sharp identified interval without requiring optimal threshold estimation. Stronger conditions yield semiparametric efficient estimation and inference for restricted-class bounds. Numerical experiments show narrower confidence sets when incorporating an instrument and compare the performance of outward inference and inference for individual bounds. We apply the framework to the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment to illustrate how combining instrumental-variable assumptions with restrictions on the degree of unmeasured confounding can strengthen conclusions about the effect of Medicaid coverage on emergency-department use.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Antonio Olivas-Martinez, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen. 2026-10-15. Sharp Instrumental Variable Bounds under The Marginal Sensitivity Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22513

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Logistic Regression Equivalent Weights for Survey Inference: Construction and Asymptotic Properties

Equivalent weights from regression models provide a bridge between design-based and model- based survey inference. We develop a frequentist survey-weighting framework for logistic regres- sion equivalent weights under categorical poststratification. Because the logistic model-based population estimator is nonlinear in the observed outcomes, we define equivalent weights through a local first-order representation, with each weight given by the scaled derivative of the popula- tion estimator with respect to the corresponding observed outcome. This construction yields an explicit closed-form expression in terms of the fitted logistic model and population cell structure. We establish convergence of the effective sample size ratio, asymptotic linearity of the resulting weighted estimator, and a consistent plug-in variance estimator under a finite-cell superpop- ulation framework. Simulation results examine population recovery, regression performance, effective sample size, and the finite-sample behavior of the asymptotic variance approximation. The results show that logistic equivalent weighting provides competitive finite-sample point esti- mation and approximately valid plug-in variance estimation, effective sample size is competitive with alternative model-based weighting in the settings considered. An application to the Fu- ture of Families and Child Wellbeing Study illustrates the construction and use of the proposed weights and variance estimator in an empirical survey setting. We emphasize the relationship between logistic equivalent weighting and recent work on locally equivalent weights for non- linear multilevel regression and poststratification, while focusing specifically on the frequentist interpretation of the weights, their survey-weight properties, and their use for inference.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Small-study effects on the hierarchical summary ROC curve: latent accuracy and threshold trends in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Diagnostic meta-analyses commonly assess small-study effects using the Deeks test, which tests for a study-size trend in the log diagnostic odds ratio. Under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model, this quantity reflects both latent accuracy and threshold unless the curve is symmetric. A threshold trend can therefore generate a log diagnostic odds ratio trend without a latent accuracy trend, or conceal an existing one. We develop a likelihood-ratio test of the latent accuracy trend under a common-shape binomial HSROC model. Its null hypothesis states that the summary curve is unchanged across study sizes. A log diagnostic odds ratio test using the same binomial fit provides a comparison with a different null hypothesis. In simulations, the proposed test remained near its nominal level under its null and had higher power than Deeks with a latent accuracy trend alone. In a colorectal cancer review of faecal immunochemical tests, it detected a negative latent accuracy trend obscured on the log diagnostic odds ratio scale by an opposing threshold contribution. All three tests detected size trends for impedance plethysmography in deep-vein thrombosis, where the fitted curve was nearly symmetric. The proposed test distinguishes changes in the summary curve from changes in operating position.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Hierarchical Gaussian Processes for Survey Weighting: Local Equivalent Weights in Structured Populations

Regression-based survey weighting connects model-based population estimation with design-based inference through equivalent weights. For nonlinear models, equivalent weights can be defined locally through the sensitivity of a poststratified population estimator. However, conventional regression models may inadequately capture nonlinear relationships and complex interactions across sparse poststratification cells. We develop a survey-weighting framework based on hierarchical Gaussian process (HGP) regression, combining structured group-level effects with kernel-based smoothing to share information across related cells. We derive Gaussian posterior prediction formulas that exploit the structured covariance representation to reduce computational costs. We also establish a uniform convergence result for the posterior predictive mean under stated regularity conditions and construct local equivalent weights by matching the first-order sensitivity of a plug-in poststratified estimand to that of a weighted average of fitted response means, with both derivatives taken with respect to the latent mean-scale vector. Simulations show that HGP achieves lower population-weighted prediction error under nonparametric structure, whereas logistic regression performs well under correct parametric specification. Additional analyses examine sample size, frame coverage, subgroup prediction, and population-mean agreement. An application to the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study illustrates the method. Overall, this work extends local equivalent-weight construction to nonparametric modeling and provides a computational framework and conditional theoretical results for survey weighting in structured, sparse populations.

stat.ME↗