arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.22422

Case-Specific Priors-Guided Multimodal Fusion for Prognosis Prediction in Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract

Accurate prognosis prediction for head and neck cancer typically necessitates integrating highly heterogeneous clinical and pathological evidence by sophisticated multimodal fusion. However, existing fusion techniques are usually grounded in case-generic clinical rationales about complementary synergies across modalities, underestimating case-specific variance. In this study, we propose a prognosis prediction framework that explicitly incorporates Case-specific Priors to guide Multimodal fusion (named CPM). It leverages broad medical knowledge of LLMs to characterize each case's (case-specific) intra-modal contexts and inter-modal relations, as well as case-generic multimodal rationale, as priors, enabling three-stage priors-guided multimodal fusion: (i) Intra-modal Context-guided Calibration (IntraCC) that leverages case-specific intra-modal priors to guide feature calibration within each modality; (ii) Inter-modal Relation-guided Interaction (InterRI) that leverages case-specific inter-modal priors to guide pair-wise feature interaction in modality pairs; and (iii) Multimodal Rationale-guided Aggregation (MultiRA) that leverages case-generic multimodal priors to guide final feature aggregation over all modalities. On the well-established HANCOCK challenge dataset involving four distinct medical modalities, our CPM achieved a mean AUC of 83.98% for predicting 5-year overall survival and 2-year recurrence-free survival, improving upon the baseline by 7.58%, pioneeringly demonstrating the effectiveness of LLM-derived medical priors in guiding multimodal fusion for prognosis prediction. The code is available at https://github.com/yuelin421/CPM.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yue Lin, Shuchang Ye, Shenghai Wu, Dashun Zheng, Mingyuan Meng. 2026-10-15. Case-Specific Priors-Guided Multimodal Fusion for Prognosis Prediction in Head and Neck Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-38172-9_11

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Latent Representation Learning from 3D Brain MRI for Latent Analysis and Prediction in Multiple Sclerosis

Neurological diseases can cause significant cognitive impairment, yet linking brain structure to cognitive function remains challenging due to the limitations of conventional methods and the black-box nature of deep learning. We propose InfoVAE-Med3D, an adaptation of InfoVAE for three-dimensional brain MRI that learns informative latent representations by relaxing the mutual information regularization penalty between inputs and latent representations. We evaluated the method on a healthy control (HC) dataset (\(n=6{,}503\)) with age and sex information and a multiple sclerosis (MS) dataset (\(n=916\)) with age, sex, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) scores. Two-dimensional visualizations revealed sex-related clustering and smooth transitions in grey and white matter volumes. Removing the mutual information regularization penalty generally improved MRI reconstruction and brain age and SDMT prediction using support vector regression, outperforming other variational autoencoder variants and achieving competitive performance with deep learning predictors, particularly on the MS dataset. InfoVAE-Med3D provides informative latent representations for investigating brain-related characteristics and supports latent-space analysis and imaging biomarker discovery for cognitive impairment, particularly in MS.

eess.IV↗

EvoPS: Evolutionary Patch Selection for Whole Slide Image Analysis in Computational Pathology

In computational pathology, the gigapixel scale of Whole-Slide Images (WSIs) necessitates their division into thousands of smaller patches. Analyzing these high-dimensional patch embeddings is computationally expensive and risks diluting key diagnostic signals with many uninformative patches. Existing patch selection methods often rely on random sampling or simple clustering heuristics and typically fail to explicitly manage the crucial trade-off between the number of selected patches and the accuracy of the resulting slide representation. To address this gap, we propose EvoPS (Evolutionary Patch Selection), a novel framework that formulates patch selection as a multi-objective optimization problem and leverages an evolutionary search to simultaneously minimize the number of selected patch embeddings and maximize the performance of a downstream similarity search task, generating a Pareto front of optimal trade-off solutions. We validated our framework across four major cancer cohorts from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) using five pretrained deep learning models to generate patch embeddings, including both supervised CNNs and large self-supervised foundation models. The results demonstrate that EvoPS can reduce the required number of training patch embeddings by over 90% while consistently maintaining or even improving the final classification F1-score compared to a baseline that uses all available patches' embeddings selected through a standard extraction pipeline. The EvoPS framework provides a robust and principled method for creating efficient, accurate, and interpretable WSI representations, empowering users to select an optimal balance between computational cost and diagnostic performance.

eess.IV↗

Calibrated Selective Prediction Using Deep Ensembles for ROI-Based Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Classification Under Dataset Shift: A Retrospective Evaluation

Background: Deep learning models can classify thyroid nodules on ultrasound, but reliable clinical decision support also requires calibrated probabilities, uncertainty estimation, and selective referral, particularly under dataset shift. Methods: We developed a calibrated deterministic five-member deep ensemble for ROI-based thyroid nodule classification and selective image-based triage. TN5000 was used for model development, five-fold cross-validation, member-wise vector-scaling calibration, and fold-specific threshold selection. TN3K served as an independent external dataset-shift evaluation. The framework used ConvNeXt-Tiny with squeeze-and-excitation attention, ensemble-mean malignancy probability, and mutual information (MI) as an ensemble-disagreement score. A three-tier policy assigned images to No-FNA suggestion, FNA recommendation, or radiologist review. Results: On pooled out-of-fold TN5000 predictions, the ensemble achieved AUC-ROC 0.9395, AP 0.9715, ECE 0.0088, and Brier score 0.0813. At 50% nominal MI retention, 7.2% of cases received a No-FNA suggestion, 39.9% an FNA recommendation, and 52.9% radiologist review, with 98.3% No-FNA NPV and 99.83% malignancy capture. On TN3K, AUC-ROC decreased to 0.7870, AP to 0.7254, ECE increased to 0.1899, and Brier score to 0.2281. The frozen TN5000 policy assigned 83.7% to review, 1.0% to No-FNA, and 15.3% to FNA recommendation. No malignant image entered the No-FNA pathway, but FNA-recommendation PPV fell to 76.6%. Conclusion: The framework showed strong internal discrimination and calibration, but limited external threshold transportability. Selective prediction may help identify images unsuitable for automated triage, but local recalibration, threshold validation, and prospective clinical evaluation are required before deployment.

eess.IV↗