arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.22303

Chemical Demographics of Star-forming Regions

Abstract

Our understanding of complex organic chemistry during the formation of stars and planets is shaped by a handful of cherry-picked sources with bright molecular emission lines. This observational bias impedes our assessment of how universal chemical complexity is during star formation. The lack of systematic wideband spectral surveys for statistically significant samples of protostars and cores is a major roadblock to properly probing how COM inventories and abundances depend on the vast range of physical conditions, local cloud and global galactic environments, and evolutionary timescales of low- and high-mass star formation. In turn, this limits our ability to constrain and test physicochemical models, which depend critically on these parameters. The next-generation ALMA2040, with a 10x improvement in line sensitivity, is required to observe COMs, that we perceive as common today, in a fraction of the observing time that is needed today with ALMA. Such capabilities will propel us into the era of chemical demographics, whereby wideband (>100 GHz) spectral surveys at high sensitivity (routinely probing COM abundances down to 0.01% relative to CH3OH) will be executed towards >1000-10000 prestellar and protostellar sources. With robust chemical inventories towards large source sample sizes, we will be able to probe for dependencies of chemical complexity on mass regime, feedback processes in a cluster, Galactic position, metallicity, and time-variable accretion. Only with statistically significant samples at high sensitivity will we be able to assess the ubiquity and homogeneity of COM chemistry across the protostellar mass spectrum and natal cores. Constraining the diversity and availability of such species is critical for our understanding of the chemical reservoir available for planet formation, which eventually shapes (exo)planetary atmosphere compositions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maria N. Drozdovskaya, Timea Csengeri, Maria Teresa Beltrán, Jes Jørgensen, Alain Baudry, Henrik Beuther, Laure Bouscasse, Laura Colzi, Audrey Coutens, Marta De Simone, Pamela Klaassen, Maryvonne Gerin, Adam Ginsburg, Daniel Harsono, Katharine Johnston, Xing Lu, Sébastien Maret, Sergio Martín, Aina Palau, Giovanni Sabatini, Miguel Sanz-Novo, Maxime Tanious, Claudia Toci, Yao-Lun Yang, Shaoshan Zeng, Korash Assani, Aurore Bacmann, Eleonora Bianchi, Gary Fuller, Izaskun Jiménez-Serra, Ágnes Kóspál, Michael Küffmeier, Álvaro Sánchez-Monge, Frédérique Motte, Mamta Pandey-Pommier, Dries Van De Putte, Víctor Rivilla, Łukasz Tychoniec. 2026-10-15. Chemical Demographics of Star-forming Regions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22303

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Using 23 Years of ACS/SBC Data to Understand Backgrounds: Significant Reductions in Expected Background Levels

We have used 23 years of Hubble Space Telescope ACS/SBC data to study what background levels are encountered in practice and how much they vary. The backgrounds vary considerably, with F115LP, F122M, F125LP, PR110L, and PR130L all showing over an order of magnitude of variation in background between observations, apparently due to changes in airglow. The F150LP and F165LP filters, which are dominated by dark rate, not airglow, exhibit a far smaller variation in backgrounds. For the filters where the background is generally dominated by airglow, the backgrounds measured from the data are significantly lower than what the ETC predicts (as of ETC v33.2). The ETC predictions for `average' airglow are greater than the median of our measured background values by factors of 2.51, 2.64, 105, and 3.64, for F115LP, F122M, F125LP, and F140LP, respectively. A preliminary analysis suggests this could be due to certain OI airglow lines usually being fainter than expected by the ETC. With reduced reduced background levels, the shorter-wavelength SBC filters can conduct background-limited observations much more rapidly than had previously been expected. As of ETC v34.1, a new option will be included for SBC calculations, allowing users to employ empirical background percentiles to estimate required exposure times.

astro-ph.IM↗

Using 23 Years of ACS/SBC Data to Understand Backgrounds: Explaining & Predicting Background Variations

Recent analysis of 23 years of Hubble Space Telescope ACS/SBC data has shown that background levels can vary considerably between observations, with most filters showing over an order of magnitude variation. For the shorter-wavelength filters, the background is understood to be dominated by airglow; however, what precisely drives background variations is not well constrained for any filter. Here, we explore the causes of the background variation. Using over 8,000 archival SBC observations, we developed a machine learning model that can accurately predict the background for an observation, based upon a set of 23 observational parameters. This model indicates that, depending on filter, the SBC background is generally dominated by Solar elevation, Solar separation angle, Earth limb angle of observation, SBC temperature, and target Galactic latitude.

astro-ph.IM↗

Beyond the BLUE I: the advantage ceiling - how much can any estimator beat the matched filter in mm/submm survey data?

Papers claiming that convolutional neural networks outperform the matched filter are now common in astronomy. Since that filter is the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) for any noise of given covariance, and the minimum-variance unbiased estimator under Gaussian noise, such a claim requires that the noise covariance varies from image to image or the noise is non-Gaussian. We introduce the advantage ceiling eta >= 1, which quantifies both cases: the Fisher information for the amplitude in units of the matched filter's, computable from noise-only simulations before any network is trained, and a bound on the variance of any estimator unbiased at each true amplitude. We compute eta for a suite of millimeter/submillimeter survey noise models and for compact and extended source templates, using a variational score-matching ladder whose rungs are estimator classes of increasing statistical order, from linear to convolutional. With an instrumental white-noise floor, Gaussian noise returns eta = 0.94-1.06 (+-0.04); covariance mixtures give exact ceilings of 10.2 (spectral tilt, extended source), 2.1 (leaked components) and 1.1-1.8 otherwise; residual artifacts give eta <= 1.09. Source confusion gives the largest advantage, eta >= 3.8 (extended) and >= 2.4 (compact). Three unmodelled channels - a zeroed DC mode, a missing white floor and floating-point rounding - can manufacture spurious advantages of up to two orders of magnitude. A ResNet regressor is 6-15% less efficient than the matched filter on Gaussian noise once prior shrinkage is divided out, and realizes a factor 1.8 of the 10.2 available on the spectral-tilt mixture; a companion paper tests such regressors against these ceilings.

astro-ph.IM↗