arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.21441

Resolving the Assembly of Disk Galaxies from the Epoch of Reionisation to Cosmic Noon

Abstract

Most of the mass and angular momentum of today's disk galaxies assembled at $z>1$. Yet, it remains unclear how these galaxies acquired their gas, how their baryons and dark matter coevolved, and how feedback and radial gas transport shaped their disks. Addressing these gaps requires resolved observations of cold gas, which carries most of the mass and angular momentum involved in galaxy assembly. By resolving CO and [C II] at kpc scales, ALMA revealed a surprising population of rotation-dominated disks, even at $z>2$, exhibiting kinematic signatures consistent with spiral arms, bars, and tidal tails. Yet, these studies are limited to massive ($M_\star>10^{10.5}$ M$_\odot$) and highly star-forming (SFRs$\gtrsim 100$ M$_\odot$yr$^{-1}$) galaxies, the progenitors of today's most massive elliptical and disk galaxies. To understand how most present-day spirals (like the Milky Way) assembled, it is crucial to resolve their low-mass progenitors, which dominate the star-forming galaxy population by number at $z>1$. Achieving this goal demands a tenfold increase in line sensitivity and hence a next-generation sub-/millimetre facility: ALMA2040. This leap in sensitivity will enable routine resolved studies of hundreds of $M_\star>10^9$ M$_\odot$ galaxies, including those on and below the main sequence of star-forming galaxies, providing representative, statistical galaxy samples with sub-kpc constraints on the cold gas kinematics and morphology. By uniquely providing resolved CO, [C I], and [C II] observations across $z=1-6$, ALMA2040 will trace a much larger fraction of the cold-gas reservoir than is accessible today, extending resolved studies from rare massive and/or lensed systems to representative galaxy populations. In this way, ALMA2040 will transform our understanding of how galaxy disks formed and evolved.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Melanie Kaasinen, Mahsa Kohandel, Francesca Rizzo, Cecilia Bacchini, Anita Zanella, Lucie Rowland, Miguel Querejeta, Hannah R. Stacey, Andrea Lapi, Umberto Maio, Kirsty M. Butler, Gareth Jones, Emily Wisnioski, Justin Spilker, Livia Vallini, Andrea Pallottini, Belén Alcade Pampliega, Juan Molina, Pavel Mancera Piña, Corentin Cadiou, Giulia Despali, Francesco Salvestrini, Federico Lelli, Daizhong Liu, Maruša Bradač, Karina Caputi, Michele Ginolfi, Matteo Messa, Isabella Lamperti, Marcel Neeleman, Alba Vidal-García, Jeremy Fensch, Seiji Fujimoto, Jacqueline A. Hodge, Gergö Popping, Sabine Thater, Elisabete da Cunha, Leindert A. Boogaard, Manuel Aravena, Takafumi Tsukui, Deanne Fisher, James McGregor, Pierre Cox, Jonathan Freundlich, Mamta Pandey-Pommier, Miguel Pereira-Santaella, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Vanshika Kansal. 2026-10-15. Resolving the Assembly of Disk Galaxies from the Epoch of Reionisation to Cosmic Noon. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21441

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Using 23 Years of ACS/SBC Data to Understand Backgrounds: Significant Reductions in Expected Background Levels

We have used 23 years of Hubble Space Telescope ACS/SBC data to study what background levels are encountered in practice and how much they vary. The backgrounds vary considerably, with F115LP, F122M, F125LP, PR110L, and PR130L all showing over an order of magnitude of variation in background between observations, apparently due to changes in airglow. The F150LP and F165LP filters, which are dominated by dark rate, not airglow, exhibit a far smaller variation in backgrounds. For the filters where the background is generally dominated by airglow, the backgrounds measured from the data are significantly lower than what the ETC predicts (as of ETC v33.2). The ETC predictions for `average' airglow are greater than the median of our measured background values by factors of 2.51, 2.64, 105, and 3.64, for F115LP, F122M, F125LP, and F140LP, respectively. A preliminary analysis suggests this could be due to certain OI airglow lines usually being fainter than expected by the ETC. With reduced reduced background levels, the shorter-wavelength SBC filters can conduct background-limited observations much more rapidly than had previously been expected. As of ETC v34.1, a new option will be included for SBC calculations, allowing users to employ empirical background percentiles to estimate required exposure times.

astro-ph.IM↗

Using 23 Years of ACS/SBC Data to Understand Backgrounds: Explaining & Predicting Background Variations

Recent analysis of 23 years of Hubble Space Telescope ACS/SBC data has shown that background levels can vary considerably between observations, with most filters showing over an order of magnitude variation. For the shorter-wavelength filters, the background is understood to be dominated by airglow; however, what precisely drives background variations is not well constrained for any filter. Here, we explore the causes of the background variation. Using over 8,000 archival SBC observations, we developed a machine learning model that can accurately predict the background for an observation, based upon a set of 23 observational parameters. This model indicates that, depending on filter, the SBC background is generally dominated by Solar elevation, Solar separation angle, Earth limb angle of observation, SBC temperature, and target Galactic latitude.

astro-ph.IM↗

Beyond the BLUE I: the advantage ceiling - how much can any estimator beat the matched filter in mm/submm survey data?

Papers claiming that convolutional neural networks outperform the matched filter are now common in astronomy. Since that filter is the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) for any noise of given covariance, and the minimum-variance unbiased estimator under Gaussian noise, such a claim requires that the noise covariance varies from image to image or the noise is non-Gaussian. We introduce the advantage ceiling eta >= 1, which quantifies both cases: the Fisher information for the amplitude in units of the matched filter's, computable from noise-only simulations before any network is trained, and a bound on the variance of any estimator unbiased at each true amplitude. We compute eta for a suite of millimeter/submillimeter survey noise models and for compact and extended source templates, using a variational score-matching ladder whose rungs are estimator classes of increasing statistical order, from linear to convolutional. With an instrumental white-noise floor, Gaussian noise returns eta = 0.94-1.06 (+-0.04); covariance mixtures give exact ceilings of 10.2 (spectral tilt, extended source), 2.1 (leaked components) and 1.1-1.8 otherwise; residual artifacts give eta <= 1.09. Source confusion gives the largest advantage, eta >= 3.8 (extended) and >= 2.4 (compact). Three unmodelled channels - a zeroed DC mode, a missing white floor and floating-point rounding - can manufacture spurious advantages of up to two orders of magnitude. A ResNet regressor is 6-15% less efficient than the matched filter on Gaussian noise once prior shrinkage is divided out, and realizes a factor 1.8 of the 10.2 available on the spectral-tilt mixture; a companion paper tests such regressors against these ceilings.

astro-ph.IM↗