arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.21330

VoteGEO-Bench: Measuring the Impact of Generative Engine Optimization on Electoral Visibility

Shiqi Zhang·Xiaokui Xiao
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for election information, yet little is known about how external web content shapes the political information they present. Generative engine optimization (GEO) rewrites web content to improve its visibility in generated responses. To investigate its potential risks in voting scenarios (VoteGEO), we introduce VoteGEO-Bench, a benchmark covering the 2024 U.S. presidential election and the 2026 Japanese House of Representatives election, combining election-related queries, historical webpages, and voter personas. We first analyze sources cited by generative engines and find that many citations come from lower-cost owned and open-platform sources, while some webpages remain visible across days. We then evaluate 11 rewriting strategies in 4 categories, examining target specification, effectiveness across engines and elections, and the role of voter personas. Rewriting without specifying a target rarely increases target exposure, whereas target-specified rewriting more often does. Strategies that improve page organization or strengthen a position through argumentation yield greater gains than adding supporting evidence or changing wording. For the two strongest strategies, gains remain broadly positive across evaluated U.S. personas, but persona conditioning shows no consistent effect on these gains. Explicit partisan identities can create baseline exposure gaps larger than the gain from rewriting one webpage. When partisanship is implicit in the voter profile, baseline shifts depend on how strongly the engine responds to that signal.

Explore related subjects

cs.IRcs.CLcs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shiqi Zhang, Xiaokui Xiao. 2026-10-15. VoteGEO-Bench: Measuring the Impact of Generative Engine Optimization on Electoral Visibility. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21330

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How Do LLM-Generated Texts Impact Term-Based Retrieval Models?

As more content generated by large language models (LLMs) floods into the Internet, information retrieval (IR) systems now face the challenge of distinguishing and handling a blend of human-authored and machine-generated texts. Recent studies suggest that neural retrievers may exhibit a preferential inclination toward LLM-generated content, while classic term-based retrievers like BM25 tend to favor human-written documents. This paper investigates the influence of LLM-generated content on term-based retrieval models, which are valued for their efficiency and robust generalization across domains. Our linguistic analysis reveals that LLM-generated texts exhibit smoother high-frequency and steeper low-frequency Zipf slopes, higher term specificity, and greater document-level diversity. These traits are aligned with LLMs being trained to optimize reader experience through diverse and precise expressions. Our study further explores whether term-based retrieval models demonstrate source bias, concluding that these models prioritize documents whose term distributions closely correspond to those of the queries, rather than displaying an inherent source bias. This work provides a foundation for understanding and addressing potential biases in term-based IR systems managing mixed-source content.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

GRASP: Plan-Guided Graph Retrieval with Adaptive Fusion and Reranking on Semi-Structured Knowledge Bases

Retrieval over semi-structured knowledge bases (SKBs) must handle both textual descriptions and relational constraints. Text-based retrievers capture the overall semantics of a query but struggle with multi-hop relations, whereas graph-based retrievers follow relational paths precisely but miss the broader meaning. We propose GRASP, a hybrid retriever that learns to fuse the two. A small LLM planner translates the query into an executable graph plan in a single call, its graph ranking is fused with a text ranking, and a fine-tuned reranker reorders the fused candidates. Instead of training the planner to be accurate on its own, we optimize it with reinforcement learning to maximize the gain its graph ranking brings to the fused ranking. On three STaRK benchmarks, GRASP achieves the best results on all metrics, improving the average Hit@1 by 18.6 points over the strongest baseline, while taking only 2.47 seconds per query.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory

Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators. However, memory is not always beneficial: retrieved memories often induce a critical issue of sycophancy, causing agents to over-align with the user at the cost of factual accuracy or objective reasoning. Despite this emerging risk, existing memory benchmarks primarily evaluate whether memories are correctly stored, retrieved, or updated, while overlooking how retrieved memories influence downstream reasoning and decision-making. To bridge this gap, we propose MemSyco-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating memory-induced sycophancy in agent systems. MemSyco-Bench measures when memory should influence a decision and how valid memory should be used. Specifically, it covers five tasks that assess whether agents can reject memory as factual evidence, respect its applicable scope, resolve conflicts between memory and objective evidence, track memory updates, and use valid memory for personalization. All related resources are collected for the community at https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/MemSyco-Bench.

cs.IR↗