arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.21243

A Responsibility-Centered Coordination Mechanism for Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems

Thi-Nhung Nguyen·Viet-Thanh Pham·Linhao Luo·Thuy-Trang Vu·Dinh Phung
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Centralized orchestration provides comprehensive multi-agent coordination but creates bottlenecks in scalability, adaptability, and collective performance. Decentralized approaches alleviate these bottlenecks by distributing coordination across agents, yet often leave responsibility for delegated dependencies and failure recovery unclear. To address this gap, we propose RCM, a responsibility-centered coordination mechanism that leverages commitments to couple task delegation with explicit responsibilities of the involved parties. Through recursive delegation, agents retain their upstream responsibilities while locally orchestrating downstream commitments, thereby preserving accountability across delegation chains, creating a network of local orchestration. We operationalize this mechanism locally through responsibility-constrained decision-making and a responsibility-oriented communication protocol (RCP), enabling agents to autonomously establish, manage, and terminate commitments. As agents act in parallel, their local actions continuously evolve the commitment graph, allowing global coordination to emerge and adapt toward a shared mission without centralized control. Experiments across reasoning, coding, and executable agent environments demonstrate that RCM outperforms strong centralized and decentralized coordination baselines by up to 18.7 points in task performance and 10.2 points in Responsibility, while improving failure and harm detection without task-specific training.

Explore related subjects

cs.MAcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thi-Nhung Nguyen, Viet-Thanh Pham, Linhao Luo, Thuy-Trang Vu, Dinh Phung. 2026-10-15. A Responsibility-Centered Coordination Mechanism for Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21243

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Distributed scalable coupled policy algorithm for networked multi-agent reinforcement learning

This paper studies networked multi-agent reinforcement learning (NMARL) with interdependent rewards and coupled policies. In this setting, each agent's reward depends on its own state-action pair as well as those of its direct neighbors, and each agent's policy is parameterized by its local parameters together with those of its $κ_{p}$-hop neighbors, with $κ_{p}\geq 1$ denoting the coupled radius. The objective of the agents is to collaboratively optimize their policies to maximize the discounted average cumulative reward. To address the challenge of interdependent policies in collaborative optimization, we introduce a novel concept termed the ``neighbors' averaged $Q$-function'' and derive a new expression for the coupled-policy gradient. Based on these theoretical foundations, we develop a distributed scalable coupled policy (DSCP) algorithm, where each agent relies only on the state-action pairs of its $κ_{p}$-hop neighbors and the rewards of its $(κ_{p}+1)$-hop neighbors. Specifically, in the DSCP algorithm, we employ a geometric 2-horizon sampling method that does not require storing a full $Q$-table to obtain an unbiased estimate of the coupled policy gradient. Moreover, each agent interacts exclusively with its direct neighbors to obtain accurate policy parameters, while maintaining local estimates of other agents' parameters to execute its local policy and collect samples for optimization. These estimates and policy parameters are updated via a push-sum protocol, enabling distributed coordination of policy updates across the network. We prove that the joint policy produced by the proposed algorithm converges to a first-order stationary point of the objective function. Finally, the effectiveness of DSCP algorithm is demonstrated through simulations in a robot path planning environment, showing clear improvement over state-of-the-art methods.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

ORACLE-SWE: Quantifying the Contribution of Critical Information Signals on SWE Agents

Recent advances in Language Model (LM) agents have increasingly focused on repository-level software engineering (SWE) tasks, leading to various agentic workflows, training methods and failure analysis. Interestingly, rather than directly generating or evaluating edit patches, these approaches first examine and improve intermediate information signals collected during agent exploration, including Reproduction Test, Regression Test, Edit Location, Execution Context, and API Usage. Although different studies examine different subsets of these signals, no work has systematically compared their relative effectiveness in improving final task success or measured the remaining space for improvement in each signal. To address this gap, this work quantifies the contributions of both oracle and agent-extracted signals to final task success and measures the gap between current agent-found signals and their oracle counterparts. We hope our findings could suggest future research emphasis in SWE agents. We release our source code and oracle-signal dataset as a reusable methodology to benefit future signal analysis of SWE agents.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

MasDrift: Benchmarking Authorization Preservation Across Multi-Agent Architectures

Multi-agent systems (MAS) decompose long-horizon tasks across supervisors and subagents, but delegated goals do not necessarily carry their original authorization boundaries. Existing safety benchmarks mainly study adversarial compromise, while work on constraint drift lacks controlled architecture-level evaluation. We introduce MasDrift, a benchmark of 600 benign productivity tasks across eight domains. Each task pairs required work with reserved actions. MasDrift compares single-agent, centralized, and decentralized coordination while varying hierarchy depth and peer width, measuring task completion and authorization preservation. Across generic multi-agent conditions, centralized hierarchies achieve 93.9--98.6% task completion versus 85.7--87.0% for peer networks, while unauthorized actions occur in 2.7--19.8% of tasks versus 0.6--0.8%, a gap that widens with hierarchy depth. We further compare two defenses that differ in where authorization evidence resides. One re-anchors every pending call to the original user request. The other carries an attenuated policy along the delegation chain. Re-anchoring reduces unauthorized actions in every model configuration we evaluate, at a cost of 1.6 points of pooled completion. Chain propagation blocks required work instead, forfeiting up to 36.3 points. A heterogeneous case study confirms that the failure follows from coordination rather than model strength. MasDrift exposes a centralization tradeoff and makes authorization preservation a measurable property of MAS design.

cs.MA↗