arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.20885

Unveiling the Baryon Cycle Through Cosmic Time

Abstract

Galaxy evolution is governed by the baryon cycle: gas accreted from the cosmic web and circumgalactic medium condenses into molecular gas, forms stars, and is redistributed by stellar and AGN feedback. Tracing the molecular phase is therefore essential to understanding how galaxies acquire, consume, and eject their baryons. Yet current molecular-gas surveys remain limited by sensitivity, area, cosmic variance, and spectral bandwidth. ALMA2040 would combine a $\sim10\times$ sensitivity improvement with $\gtrsim512$ GHz simultaneous frequency coverage, delivering $\sim100\times$ faster mapping at fixed depth and a further $\gtrsim25\times$ gain in instantaneous bandwidth. Together, these advances would increase spectroscopic survey speed by orders of magnitude, enabling tiered ``wedding-cake'' strategies: an ultra-deep $\sim4$-5 arcmin$^2$ field probing faint and high-redshift reservoirs, a $\sim$0.25 deg$^2$ survey reaching molecular-line sensitivities comparable to current ultra-deep fields over a much larger cosmological volume, and thousands of independent pointings minimizing cosmic variance. Broad spectral coverage would simultaneously detect multiple CO transitions, [CI], H$_2$O, feedback tracers, far-IR fine-structure lines, and dust continuum, constraining molecular gas, ISM conditions, obscured star formation, and gas flows within the same observations. Every targeted observation would also become a molecular deep field, extending these measurements to serendipitous galaxies. Together with future HI, optical, and near-IR surveys, ALMA2040 would enable a population-resolved view of the baryon cycle across cosmic time and stringent tests of galaxy formation models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Manuel Aravena, Leindert A. Boogaard, Jorge González-López, Ryan Keenan, Chiara Circosta, Pierre Cox, Roberto Decarli, Tanio Díaz-Santos, Andreas Faisst, Román Fernández-Aranda, Jonathan Freundlich, Carlotta Gruppioni, Mahmoud Hamed, Gareth Jones, Melanie Kaasinen, Adarsh Kumar, Ivanna Langan, Andrea Lapi, Daizhong Liu, Umberto Maio, Chiara Mazzucchelli, Dieu Nguyen, Mamta Pandey-Pommier, Prachi Prajapati, Gergö Popping, Dominik Riechers, Matus Rybak, Irene Shivaei, Lucie Rowland, Livia Vallini, Julie Wardlow. 2026-10-14. Unveiling the Baryon Cycle Through Cosmic Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20885

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Using 23 Years of ACS/SBC Data to Understand Backgrounds: Significant Reductions in Expected Background Levels

We have used 23 years of Hubble Space Telescope ACS/SBC data to study what background levels are encountered in practice and how much they vary. The backgrounds vary considerably, with F115LP, F122M, F125LP, PR110L, and PR130L all showing over an order of magnitude of variation in background between observations, apparently due to changes in airglow. The F150LP and F165LP filters, which are dominated by dark rate, not airglow, exhibit a far smaller variation in backgrounds. For the filters where the background is generally dominated by airglow, the backgrounds measured from the data are significantly lower than what the ETC predicts (as of ETC v33.2). The ETC predictions for `average' airglow are greater than the median of our measured background values by factors of 2.51, 2.64, 105, and 3.64, for F115LP, F122M, F125LP, and F140LP, respectively. A preliminary analysis suggests this could be due to certain OI airglow lines usually being fainter than expected by the ETC. With reduced reduced background levels, the shorter-wavelength SBC filters can conduct background-limited observations much more rapidly than had previously been expected. As of ETC v34.1, a new option will be included for SBC calculations, allowing users to employ empirical background percentiles to estimate required exposure times.

astro-ph.IM↗

Using 23 Years of ACS/SBC Data to Understand Backgrounds: Explaining & Predicting Background Variations

Recent analysis of 23 years of Hubble Space Telescope ACS/SBC data has shown that background levels can vary considerably between observations, with most filters showing over an order of magnitude variation. For the shorter-wavelength filters, the background is understood to be dominated by airglow; however, what precisely drives background variations is not well constrained for any filter. Here, we explore the causes of the background variation. Using over 8,000 archival SBC observations, we developed a machine learning model that can accurately predict the background for an observation, based upon a set of 23 observational parameters. This model indicates that, depending on filter, the SBC background is generally dominated by Solar elevation, Solar separation angle, Earth limb angle of observation, SBC temperature, and target Galactic latitude.

astro-ph.IM↗

Beyond the BLUE I: the advantage ceiling - how much can any estimator beat the matched filter in mm/submm survey data?

Papers claiming that convolutional neural networks outperform the matched filter are now common in astronomy. Since that filter is the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) for any noise of given covariance, and the minimum-variance unbiased estimator under Gaussian noise, such a claim requires that the noise covariance varies from image to image or the noise is non-Gaussian. We introduce the advantage ceiling eta >= 1, which quantifies both cases: the Fisher information for the amplitude in units of the matched filter's, computable from noise-only simulations before any network is trained, and a bound on the variance of any estimator unbiased at each true amplitude. We compute eta for a suite of millimeter/submillimeter survey noise models and for compact and extended source templates, using a variational score-matching ladder whose rungs are estimator classes of increasing statistical order, from linear to convolutional. With an instrumental white-noise floor, Gaussian noise returns eta = 0.94-1.06 (+-0.04); covariance mixtures give exact ceilings of 10.2 (spectral tilt, extended source), 2.1 (leaked components) and 1.1-1.8 otherwise; residual artifacts give eta <= 1.09. Source confusion gives the largest advantage, eta >= 3.8 (extended) and >= 2.4 (compact). Three unmodelled channels - a zeroed DC mode, a missing white floor and floating-point rounding - can manufacture spurious advantages of up to two orders of magnitude. A ResNet regressor is 6-15% less efficient than the matched filter on Gaussian noise once prior shrinkage is divided out, and realizes a factor 1.8 of the 10.2 available on the spectral-tilt mixture; a companion paper tests such regressors against these ceilings.

astro-ph.IM↗