Revealing Structured Heterogeneity

Christopher Turansick

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.20441

Revealing Structured Heterogeneity

Christopher Turansick

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we study models of restricted heterogeneity. While the random utility model allows for arbitrary heterogeneity among rational types, we consider the case when an analyst ex-ante restricts the set of rational types to some smaller set of allowable types. We study the behavioral content, the model fit, and the identification properties of restrictions of this form. We find that all three of these can be connected through a common value function that is constructed from observable data. Consistency with a model of restricted heterogeneity is characterized by this value function achieving a value of one, while model fit is given by a value that is potentially less than one. The partially identified set for a given model of restricted heterogeneity is characterized by way of the subdifferential of this value function.

Explore related subjects

econ.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Christopher Turansick. 2026-10-14. Revealing Structured Heterogeneity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20441

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Multiple-Player War of Attrition with Asymmetric Private Values

This paper studies a war of attrition over public good provision among multiple ex-ante asymmetric privately informed players. In equilibrium, asymmetry leads to a stratified behavior pattern in which at most one player provides the public good at time zero with a positive probability, while the other players can become active one after another, each at a player-specific activation time, before which even his highest type does not provide the good. The equilibrium is essentially unique: the types who never provide make the players' costs of providing a saddle point of the equilibrium dynamics. Comparing two players in the same war, I show that the one with lower cost, more impatience, or a value distribution tilted toward high values in the sense of a higher revelation rate provides earlier at every value, other things equal. In large societies, the cost of delay is determined by the highest value across players.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

Equitable Auctions

We study how auction design shapes surplus division among bidders. We introduce a parsimonious ex post equity notion and examine standard multi-unit auctions. The equity-optimal pricing depends sharply on the private-common value composition. Among mixed-price auctions, at one extreme, uniform pricing is always optimal for pure common values and, at the other, pay-as-bid pricing is preferred for pure private values under standard regularity assumptions. For any fixed monotone allocation rule, we characterize a BNIC interim-IR implementation that equalizes surplus ex post across all bidders and is revenue-maximizing among those that equalize surplus ex ante; efficient allocation permits parity among winners.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

Hidden Commitment Power Is Powerless

A principal who offers a contract may renege when her default option is sufficiently attractive. The size of this temptation, which inversely measures her commitment power, is often the principal's private information. This paper asks how contracting outcomes change under this information asymmetry. Disciplining off-path beliefs with the Intuitive Criterion, I find that every type of principal behaves and earns payoffs as if she were commonly known to have the least commitment power. Hidden commitment power is therefore powerless, although commitment power can be valuable under symmetric information. The result delivers an unambiguous policy lesson on how to mitigate this information asymmetry prior to contracting: only measures that improve the worst case have value. In an application to credit rating, when the cost of a rating system grows with its number of grades, a rating system that sorts issuers into ordered bands is optimal, and each issuer contracts on the terms warranted by the floor of her band.

econ.TH↗