arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.20125

Auction-based allocation of routes in capacity-constrained networks

Abstract

We study the route-set allocation problem between end nodes in capacity-constrained flow networks with transfer costs. We introduce an origin--destination (OD) bidding language, in which a participant bids for bounded conic combinations of inlet--outlet--quantity licences and the mechanism performs the routing through a network-flow optimising winner-determination problem. We then study payment rules for the OD mechanism. Under a restricted model with openly and uniformly priced sources and bidders who are indifferent to the source of the gas, the Vickrey--Clarke--Groves (VCG) payment is core-stable; the key structural fact is that in this regime some optimal aggregate flows never use a physical pipe in both directions, so the winner-determination problem reduces to a single-commodity network flow whose value is submodular in the set of active bidders. If source access is allowed to depend on the individual consumer -- a realistic feature, e.g. when gas deals are embedded in bilateral political bargaining -- the reduction fails and VCG payments may lie strictly outside the core. For this general model we propose a dual (nodal) pricing rule derived from the shadow prices of the flow-conservation constraints, and prove it is always core-stable, at the cost of dominant-strategy incentive compatibility. Illustrative examples accompany each result.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gergely Csáji, Dávid Csercsik. 2026-10-14. Auction-based allocation of routes in capacity-constrained networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20125

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Contracting under Misspecification

This paper studies agency problems when both parties worry that the model linking action to output is misspecified. With observable actions, an optimal contract is linear in output, so performance pay arises solely to share misspecification exposure, the slope reflects the parties' relative robustness concerns, and its allocation is Pareto efficient. With hidden actions, this sharing rule survives and incentives add a nonlinear correction. Misspecification concerns can polarize effort by making intermediate actions impossible to implement. Moreover, ambiguity across competing models has asymmetric effects: uncertainty about desired actions raises the principal's payoff, whereas uncertainty about deviations can lower it.

econ.TH↗

Allocative Efficiency and the Returns to Innovation

Innovation changes welfare through the technology it adds and the reallocation it causes between producers with different markups. When producers set markups, an innovator's own output and price adjustments have no private value at the margin, so reallocation reaches its profit only through others' responses. For an innovator small in its markets, none of the change in allocative efficiency, which is of the same order as its cost saving, reaches its profit under quantity or price competition. A process innovator is paid its cost saving, forgoing its own and downstream markups on added output. For U.S. public firms in 2015, these average 14 to 26 percent of that saving, and allocative efficiency rises or falls by more than a tenth of the private return for innovators holding 56 percent of sales. With estimated spillovers, patenting firms' R&D has a social return 6.24 times its private return.

econ.TH↗

A unified decision model for Bayesian ambiguity and non-affine statistics

This paper studies decision functionals under ambiguity when pure-risk evaluation is determined by a general, possibly non-affine statistic. We represent ambiguity perception by a Bayesian second-order model over first-order models and encode ambiguity attitude with a separate parameter. We formulate four consistency and monotonicity properties for decision functionals combining these objects. We show that second-order averaging does not generally preserve these properties for non-affine statistics, including expected shortfall, the industry-standard risk measure. To address this limitation, we introduce an ambiguity iron, a mapping from a second-order model and an ambiguity attitude to an ambiguity set of first-order models. Worst-case evaluation over this set preserves the chosen statistic as the pure-risk criterion. We construct an ambiguity iron by distorting the second-order model and show that it produces convex and compact sets of predictive models. We derive formulas for several classes of statistics and, in parametric settings, a sample-based approximation for the distorted expectation. Portfolio examples illustrate how ambiguity perception and attitude affect evaluations and allocations. Under posterior concentration and continuity of the parametrization, the ambiguity sets contract, and the associated decision functionals converge to their pure-risk values. We also describe a KL-based robustification for possible model misspecification.

econ.TH↗