arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.20037

Data-Driven Dynamic Portfolio Selection with Vine Copula Simulation and Reinforcement Learning

Abstract

We develop a data-driven approach to dynamic portfolio selection that combines vine-copula simulation with reinforcement learning. The investor has constant relative risk aversion and maximises expected terminal utility with a running penalty on the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) of one-period losses. We estimate a conditional vine model from historical returns and use it to generate joint scenarios for CVaR evaluation and conditional paths for training a recurrent portfolio policy. Under uniform local derivative bounds, we propagate edgewise pair-copula parameter errors through the conditional transforms to obtain power-law stability bounds in Hellinger distance and total variation. In a finite-horizon investment model, we combine these estimates with a marginal and structural approximation budget to bound policy values, optimal values and the true-market loss of policies selected under a fitted model, with separate simulation and numerical optimisation terms. On a seven-asset panel comprising US and Chinese equities and gold, the selected ensemble of ten trained policies achieves a compound annual growth rate of 34.13% and a Sharpe ratio of 2.31 over 22 complete monthly holding periods, exceeding the corresponding values of six classical and vine-based benchmarks. Combining simulated and historical training data reduces monthly target-to-target turnover by 41.5% relative to training on historical data alone, while maintaining comparable growth.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gabriël M. J. Gelissen, Fengyi Yuan. 2026-10-14. Data-Driven Dynamic Portfolio Selection with Vine Copula Simulation and Reinforcement Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20037

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Active Portfolio Management in Concentrated Equity Markets

The equal-weighted portfolio is a passive, rule-based strategy that has historically been difficult to outperform, delivering higher returns than the capitalization-weighted "market" benchmark across many markets and periods. Stochastic portfolio theory (SPT) reveals that this relative performance is regime dependent, with the equal-weighted portfolio underperforming during periods of increasing market concentration and high correlations, particularly market bubbles. These observations have motivated us to formulate and solve a stochastic control problem in which an investor actively allocates between the equal-weighted and market portfolios. The investor bases their allocation decisions on forecasts made under a flexible stochastic diversity--dispersion (SDD) model. Using a quadratic surrogate for implementation frictions, we characterize the optimal allocation through a linear forward--backward SDE and obtain an explicit "aiming in front of a moving target" representation of the optimal trading rate, in the spirit of Gârleanu and Pedersen. The penalty parameters are calibrated in sample to match the cumulative wealth effect of proportional transaction costs, while out-of-sample performance is evaluated with those costs deducted directly from portfolio wealth. Using historical S&P 500 data, we show that a mean-reverting SDD specification reproduces several empirical features of market diversity and dispersion. In out-of-sample backtests from 1995 to 2024, the resulting strategies deliver higher cumulative net returns than both the equal-weighted and market portfolios, and higher information ratios than the equal-weighted portfolio after 15-basis-point proportional transaction costs.

q-fin.PM↗

The Missile and the Toll: Two-Way Flow Through the Strait of Hormuz

Tolls for safe passage and attacks on shipping are usually treated as mutually exclusive: either ships pay or attacks happen. We argue they are complementary. In a Stackelberg escalation game for the Strait of Hormuz, the enforcer chooses an attack intensity and a toll schedule; the response is to pay, cross exposed, wait, reroute, or exit. Attacks create the willingness to pay; tolls harvest it. The model predicts asymmetry across trade forms: a toll where the cargo owner can pay and the vessel owner will consent, and none where either fails. Any such payment is clandestine, but the model's implications are testable against freight rates, insurance premia, and incident reports.

q-fin.PM↗

A Mean Field Model of Consumption Inertia and Keeping Up with the Joneses

Households compare their living standard with others' and dislike changing it. We study consumption and investment when felicity depends on consumption relative to a benchmark, the population's geometric average consumption, and cuts in felicity weigh more than increases. Asset returns are exogenous. For finitely many types and arbitrary initial wealth and inherited standards, a mean field equilibrium exists under a weak interaction condition, and for fixed budget multipliers the benchmark is the fixed point of a contraction. In a complete market with common risk, a mean field equilibrium at empirical type frequencies is an exact Nash equilibrium of the finite game, for any preferences over relative consumption. We bound the gain from deviating when plans computed at another composition are used. We compute equilibria in which groups with different wealth, inherited standards, and loss aversion revise spending at different dates. With identical households and common risk, the unique symmetric equilibrium is the policy of a single loss averse household with modified curvature. In a baseline example, ignoring the inherited standard costs up to 17% of wealth, while small errors about the composition of the reference group cost less than 0.5%.

q-fin.PM↗